- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/5/17 at 2:30 pm to joshnorris14
OP should add that in October Farkas gave a speech in Warsaw, Poland about how "If Trump wins, he will be impeached pretty quickly OR someone else will have to take control of the government."
LINK
LINK
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:03 pm to joshnorris14
Oh man this is already almost as full of "bombshells" that turn out to be duds as the last thread.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 2:08 am to montanagator
quote:
Oh man this is already almost as full of "bombshells" that turn out to be duds as the last thread.
See in the real world outside of this right wing safe space, when you throw enough shite at a wall to see what sticks and nothing does, you eventually have a big pile of shite to hold you accountable for your baseless accusations and crazy ideas. Not here. They leap frog from assumption to hopeful assumption trying their best to pin just something on obama with no avail. There will be no apologies or accountability for this stupid thread when it goes away and no one will care because there will be another distraction they'll all cling onto. It's one of the more mind blowing things I've ever seen that they never step back at least one time on this retard carousel and think, "well we've pretty much never gotten a thing right during these crazy idea threads maybe we should actually wait on evidence", but being wrong phase them as long as Obama is alive.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 6:12 am to olddawg26
No, The OP should update with any credible news reports as this story unfolds. Whatever direction it unfolds.
When I RA'd a sticky for this thread, I had also suggested that it be dual topic. Surveillance and Trump campaign cooperation w/ Russians.
So:
X denies she unmasked.
Updated later by X admits she unmasked, denies she leaked.
AND
X met w/ Russians.
Updated later by X indicates this was about energy and denies any wrongdoing.
But to go forward with your observation that there is nothing (not even potential) to the surveillance except deflection, and that the Russian thing is de facto proven is an example of living outside of what you refer to as "real world".
When I RA'd a sticky for this thread, I had also suggested that it be dual topic. Surveillance and Trump campaign cooperation w/ Russians.
So:
X denies she unmasked.
Updated later by X admits she unmasked, denies she leaked.
AND
X met w/ Russians.
Updated later by X indicates this was about energy and denies any wrongdoing.
But to go forward with your observation that there is nothing (not even potential) to the surveillance except deflection, and that the Russian thing is de facto proven is an example of living outside of what you refer to as "real world".
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 6:14 am
Posted on 4/6/17 at 6:50 am to Iowa Golfer
I mean however your intentions of the sticky, it's called obamagate. So I'd say while your RA for a sticky that goes both ways sounds nice and neutral, it's not what's going on here. Also we've had this thread before and part one was a joke.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 7:35 am to olddawg26
Except Obama did spy on trump.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 8:25 am to olddawg26
Part 1 is being continued by Part 2. Large portions of Part 1 are still germane.
Are all portions of part 1 still germane. Obviously not, the story is evolving, just as Trump potential collusion w/ Russians is.
It's not a joke. If either A) Russian Collusion, or B) Illegal Surveillance/Leaking, are true, these are huge threats to democracy as we know it.
FWIW, the only crime we factually know about is leaking. know that has
Are all portions of part 1 still germane. Obviously not, the story is evolving, just as Trump potential collusion w/ Russians is.
It's not a joke. If either A) Russian Collusion, or B) Illegal Surveillance/Leaking, are true, these are huge threats to democracy as we know it.
FWIW, the only crime we factually know about is leaking. know that has
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:38 am to joshnorris14
Last updated two days ago.
And this is stickied because?
And this is stickied because?
Posted on 4/6/17 at 11:24 am to olddawg26
quote:
I mean however your intentions of the sticky, it's called obamagate. So I'd say while your RA for a sticky that goes both ways sounds nice and neutral, it's not what's going on here. Also we've had this thread before and part one was a joke.
You know what I do when I find a board that does things I don't like? I find another board to post on.
Are you really this upset over a thread being stickied? LOL
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:14 pm to Yak
quote:
Last updated two days ago.
And this is stickied because?
Because IT's STILL REAL TO THEM DAMNIT!!
Posted on 4/6/17 at 2:32 pm to Yak
quote:
Last updated two days ago.
And this is stickied because?
Because Obama spied on trump.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 3:14 pm to Spaulding Smails
Vermin
New info is added every single day out there in the world
New info is added every single day out there in the world
Posted on 4/6/17 at 5:12 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Part One has reached its character limit, so we need another installation.
Good deal. Let us know when you reach your fake news limit.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 5:19 pm to joshnorris14
update 4/6/17
Posted on 4/6/17 at 5:22 pm to olddawg26
quote:
See in the real world outside of this right wing safe space, when you throw enough shite at a wall to see what sticks and nothing does, you eventually have a big pile of shite to hold you accountable for your baseless accusations and crazy ideas. Not here. They leap frog from assumption to hopeful assumption trying their best to pin just something on obama with no avail. There will be no apologies or accountability for this stupid thread when it goes away and no one will care because there will be another distraction they'll all cling onto. It's one of the more mind blowing things I've ever seen that they never step back at least one time on this retard carousel and think, "well we've pretty much never gotten a thing right during these crazy idea threads maybe we should actually wait on evidence", but being wrong phase them as long as Obama is alive.
it's kinda like they listen to rush or sean or somethin'!
Posted on 4/7/17 at 8:33 am to Dignan
quote:
Good deal. Let us know when you reach your fake news limit.
What is it that you believe is fake news here?
That the IC was spying on the Trump campaign and the transition team?
That Susan Rice requested (repeatedly) that American names be unmasked for as of right now unknown reasons?
That SOMEONE leaked at least one of those names and the contents of the conversation to the media?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 11:38 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:You realize that she didn't know the names until she unmasked them, right?
That Susan Rice requested (repeatedly) that American names be unmasked for as of right now unknown reasons?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:03 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
You realize that she didn't know the names until she unmasked them, right?
Sorry, that's only relevant if you're employing reason in search of the truth. So it's largely irrelevant to all these 'necks.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:35 pm to emanresu
It really feels like most people either don't understand, or don't care that the person asking for the unmasking is SUPPOSED to have a legitimate need for it, before the request is granted
So "national security" wouldn't be enough, you are supposed to be required to give a detailed explanation of why you need the names and how it would benefit whatever legitimate cause you have.
So far, that hasn't been addressed. Did Rice have a legitimate need for the intel?
So "national security" wouldn't be enough, you are supposed to be required to give a detailed explanation of why you need the names and how it would benefit whatever legitimate cause you have.
So far, that hasn't been addressed. Did Rice have a legitimate need for the intel?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News