Started By
Message

re: The Deficit Has Never Been This High When the Economy Was This Strong

Posted on 8/17/19 at 9:49 am to
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72929 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 9:49 am to
quote:

You can post all the :rofl: emojis you want, but it doesn’t make your argument any stronger.





another left wing jackass who cannot rebutt the facts like pigboy. congrats man! just spin with opinions. avoid and dodge!

nobody said obama did not inherit a recession. so did W. obama was terrible. he had plenty time. I am not re posting the lack of context you obama loving clowns conveniently leave out. scroll up, i put it in a post to ghostwriter.

let us see if trump is at 1.8 over 8 years. Did W use clinton recession as his excuse for 8 years?



Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 9:50 am to
Trump is no fiscal conservative.

The deal he cut with Pelosi and Schumer just before the August break cost us billions---I suspect he gave them everything they wanted in exchange for a vote on USMCA when Congress comes back. He should have told Ross to shut up last fall and got a republican congress to vote on it.
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Barack Obama: Added $8.588 trillion, a 74 percent increase from the $11.657 trillion debt at the end of Bush’s last budget, FY 2009.


2010 - 1.294 trillion impact of Bush's recession
2011 - 1.300 trillion impact of Bush's recession
2012 - 1.087 trillion starting to come out of recession
2013 - 679 billion
2014 - 485 billion
2015 - 438 billion
2016 - 585 billion
2017 - 665 billion

Obama was able to lower the annual deficit during his presidency without the ability to raise taxes on the rich, which he wanted to do but was unable to because of a republican congress. He did institute a small tax on the rich as part of the ACA roll out his second year, an issue that is a big win for democrats in the 2018 blue wave, after 8 years of republicans trying to undermine and kill it.

What has been the trend of Trump's deficit spending so far?

I'm curious.
This post was edited on 8/17/19 at 9:58 am
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 9:56 am to
FY 2017 - $672 billion.
FY 2016 - $1.423 trillion.
FY 2015 - $327 billion.
FY 2014 - $1.086 trillion.
FY 2013 - $672 billion.

one of us has bad numbers
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:00 am to
quote:

one of us has bad numbers


Reuters

There are multiple other sources if you need them.

Our biggest discrepancy was 2016 and 2014. That above is 2016.

This post was edited on 8/17/19 at 10:04 am
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:02 am to
The fact that you two have such differing numbers tells you how easily they can be manipulated.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72929 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Lol so many excuses for the guy



tell me about it. i'd do a monetary bet with him for 1k or more that trump will have higher GDP over 8 years than his savior obama. I am sure he is a pussy though and won't bet me.

if obama was an accomplishment than W was great!

quote:

quote:
Obama was gifted a -2.8% recession caused in large part by the deregulatory actions of his predecessors.



You mean Clinton/Cuomo



he loves job killing regulations. he must have hated reagan, and now trump obviously! also i bet he hated that damn tax cutting JFK!

Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:05 am to
quote:

The fact that you two have such differing numbers tells you how easily they can be manipulated.



No, the poster is just wrong. Don't know where he got his numbers, but we know what our annual budget deficits are.

There is some truing up as data comes in but every credible source will settle in within a few billion. There aren't 600 billion discrepancies in deficit reporting.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:06 am to
Of course, he is wrong.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:07 am to
quote:



No, the poster is just wrong. Don't know where he got his numbers, but we know what our annual budget deficits are.

There is some truing up as data comes in but every credible source will settle in within a few billion. There aren't 600 billion discrepancies in deficit reporting.


LINK

I think my source moved some numbers:

FY 2010 - $1.652 trillion.
FY 2009 - $253 billion. Congress passed the Economic Stimulus Act, which spent $253 billion in FY 2009. This rare occurrence should be added to President Obama's contribution to the debt.
FY 2009 - $1.632 trillion. This was Bush's deficit without the impact of the Economic Stimulus Act.



Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:08 am to
quote:

he loves job killing regulations. he must have hated reagan, and now trump obviously! also i bet he hated that damn tax cutting JFK!


Yeah, well we didn't have 15% unearned income tax rates on the rich now did we when JFK was POTUS?

Perspective.


You should try it, see if it makes you look less clueless.
This post was edited on 8/17/19 at 10:15 am
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Yeah, well we didn't have 15% unearned income tax rates on the rich now did we when JFK as POTUS?


This is the reason the problem won't be solved.

You are blaming the people picking up the tab instead of the people that created it.

They have you eating out of the palm of their hand.
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:

This is the reason the problem won't be solved.



Right. It won't be solved by republicans who have been in power for 11 years.

The lowest paid working poor among us pay 15.3% in federal income tax on penny one that they earn. No exemptions, no bogus made up personal expenses to deduct,

every frickin penny they earn is taxed at 15.3%.


Now compare that to the rich puss that never had to work and just inherited 20 million or whatever and sits on a beach while his inheritance generates 400,000 a year in dividend income.

This rich puss only pays 15% of that unearned money in taxes.


How the F is that fair?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74159 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Right. It won't be solved by republicans who have been in power for 11 years.


You really are a low iq tard arent you?
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69353 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:24 am to
Ummmm, you do realize that 15.3% the poor are paying are going to their ss and Medicare, right?

The rich dude who never works isn’t paying into ss and Medicare because he will not be getting it.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:25 am to
I was kinda confused about that as well.
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:26 am to
Now take that same example and apply it to a hard working middle class person that most posters here fall into at some point in your lives.

Now, in addition to the 15.3% in taxes, you also get to pay 3-4% in State income taxes on your hard earned money and also another 10-20% in effective federal income tax depending on how far up the ladder you are.

The average middle class tax payer pays in a much larger % of their wages in federal taxes than the rich.


Not sure why Trumpsters can't see that? They just applaud their orange god for cutting even more taxes on the rich to the point that many of them now pay little to nothing in taxes, living it up, while putting the burden on the middle class.


You can see how knowledgeable middle class tax payers get frustrated with their fellow middle class voters continuing to reward republicans to office that keep this unfair tax system alive, mainly to ban abortion which will never happen for any length of time.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:30 am to
I can see how you just moved the goalpost.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69353 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:31 am to
quote:


Not sure why Trumpsters can't see that? They just applaud their orange god for cutting even more taxes on the rich to the point that many of them now pay little to nothing in taxes, living it up, while putting the burden on the middle class.


You can see how knowledgeable middle class tax payers get frustrated with their fellow middle class voters continuing to reward republicans to office that keep this unfair tax system alive, mainly to ban abortion which will never happen for any length of time.



You absolute liar.

The TCJA MADE THE INCOME TAX SYSTEM MIRE PROGRESSIVE

IN 2018, the only group that saw a tax increase were those earning a million or more

The middle class saw a tax cut
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Ummmm, you do realize that 15.3% the poor are paying are going to their ss and Medicare, right?


It's something republicans don't understand when they constantly quote on here that we have all these entitlements and 50% of the workers pay no federal income tax.

100% of of W-2 working taxpayers pay federal income tax, even non-citizens who have to pay the tax but aren't eligible for the benefits.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram