Started By
Message

re: Thanks to Trump, BlackRock now owns the ports in Panama

Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:39 pm to
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57898 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

I;ve given you enough information to make better choices.


You've become SDV. "Just look it up" "i already gave you the information".

You have not. You have provided zero links and only quotes without full context to the link. Let me ask you this, did i at any point provide you any links behind a paywall? No, because i'm not trying to hide anything and i can back up my claims easily. You, on the other hand, can not. The only link you provided is behind a paywall, and everything else is a childish retort in hopes i drop it.

Just provide a valid link, dipshit. It can be any other source, but behind a paywall. Or, give me your NYtimes subscription login and i can access it. Until then, you just keep showing your arse on here.

Ignorance and purposeful stupidity is not virtuous, even if you do it anonymously. Stop treating it as a badge of courage.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:39 pm to
quote:


Can you think of a reason going from 5 Chinese ports to 3 might be a game changer.


I;'ve answered this.

There are no other Chinese ports on the canal. You people are fricking retarded.

If you read a little, your answer is posted above.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

"i already gave you the information".



Do you want it again?

70-72% of cargo traffic is going to US ports or from US Ports through the canal.

Less than 40% of all traffic utilize the chinese ports.

Doing a little math, what does this tell you? Hint: One of the ports is owned by an American conglomerate.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

So is "China owns the canal" yet you bitches cant stop saying it. Your boy has posted numerous times in this thread that China is overcharging us for the canal. Aint that retarded?


Ok. Think real hard dummy. How would now having not China own 40 percent of the canal change things.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

How would now having not China own 40 percent of the canal change things


they dont. Its wholly owned by the Panamanian authority.

They run two ports, we dont need to utilize those two ports.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

I;'ve answered this. There are no other Chinese ports on the canal. You people are fricking retarded.


Your lack of very basic business acumen is showing. That fact you can’t answer two simple questions…like usual is telling. If you can’t find it in Wiki…you don’t know about it. fricking idiot.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20103 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

So is "China owns the canal" yet you bitches cant stop saying it. Your boy has posted numerous times in this thread that China is overcharging us for the canal. Aint that retarded?


Ok. Think real hard dummy. How would now having not China own 40 percent of the canal change things.


Are you suggesting a blockade?

not a good idea.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

they dont. Its wholly owned by the Panamanian authority. They run two ports, we dont need to utilize those two ports.


holy shite. No wonder you drive a fricking bus.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:44 pm to
quote:


Your lack of very basic business acumen is showing


So is your inability to do simple math.

I've already proven you wrong that China doesnt own 5 ports on the Canal.

They dont collect fares, they only collect fees if you load/unload or fuel/take on stores.

Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Are you suggesting a blockade?


Not at all. Why would you think that? Think real real hard about some of the options. Blockade not being one of them. Yeesh.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:45 pm to
quote:



holy shite. No wonder you drive a fricking bus.


Who owns the canal?



quote:


The Panama Canal is currently owned and managed by the Panamanian government through the Panama Canal Authority, a government-owned entity
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

I've already proven you wrong that China doesnt own 5 ports on the Canal.


Uh. Yep. Blackrock now owns some. Is it time for your next tour? You aren’t good at business or critical thinking.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 3:46 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

The Panama Canal is currently owned and managed by the Panamanian government through the Panama Canal Authority, a government-owned entity


Are you alleging Hung Kong did not control portions of the canal that are now controlled by Blackrock? It’s a simple yes or no question.



I promise I don’t get a yes or no.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:47 pm to

quote:


Uh. Yep. Blackrock now owns some.


Chinese own zero on the Canal.


quote:

Panama’s five ports, Hutchison’s are the biggest — one at each end of the canal. According to the Panama Maritime Authority, Hutchison’s ports last year served vessels carrying 39 percent of the cargo containers that passed through the canal, one of the world’s most vital waterways. (The other ports are owned by a Taiwanese company, a Singaporean company and an American-Panamanian joint venture.)


We rarely utilized the "Chinese ports."
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
6089 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

And you’d rather the ccp control it


I'd rather the U.S control it. Not some overlord. Chinese or jewish
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:49 pm to
quote:


Are you alleging Hung Kong did not control portions of the canal that are now controlled by Blackrock? It’s a simple yes or no question.



None of the canal is controlled by Blackrock.

Youre an idiot.

Posted by Texas Weazel
Louisiana is a shithole
Member since Oct 2016
8946 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:49 pm to
All of this will be moot in the long run. I'd rather give Nicaragua or Mexico our business than to give it to the Sinos or the Zionists who keep corrupting the moral fabric of western countries.

Blackrock is not the lesser of two evils. They're the ones behind trans lunacy, Islamic migration to the west, and BLM. They're Zionists who are hell bent in forcing social unrest everywhere except Israel (gee, I wonder why!).
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Chinese own zero on the Canal.


quote:

Are you alleging Hung Kong did not control portions of the canal that are now controlled by Blackrock? It’s a simple yes or no question. I promise I don’t get a yes or no.


quote:

We rarely utilized the "Chinese ports."


What do you think this means about this announcement.

Or are you alleging nothing happened and this is all a lie. Blackrock didn’t spend a cent? Is that your allegation? You have zero fricking clue what you’re even arguing. It’s why all you can do is copy and paste Wikipedia. Dummy.

Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

None of the canal is controlled by Blackrock. Youre an idiot.


Perfect. So you’re saying blackrock didn’t spend anything on the Panama Canal, right? That’s your assertion, right? Yes or no?


You idiot.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57898 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

70-72% of cargo traffic is going to US ports or from US Ports through the canal.

Less than 40% of all traffic utilize the chinese ports.


Cool, all i wanted was a link to your source that isn't behind a fricking paywall, genius.

And assuming your stats are correct, how do they negate my statement that you are so pompously stating is wrong?

quote:

So what happens to one of these panamax ships that are too large are have too big of a draft to navigate the canal? What happens to all those shipping containers? They are offloaded. Where are they offloaded, jackass? That's right, the 2 largest ports of entry. They are then shipped by road and by rail (both built, maintained, and operated by China) to the next port to then be loaded back onto the ship after it makes passage, or onto different ships. Which port receives those goods to then be loaded onto those ships? That's right the other port China owned. DO you sincerely believe Chinese companies are given same rates as Chinese owned ships? Do you enjoy getting bludgeoned, or is it a symptom of your TDS?


and further backed up with links that work in this post

LINK
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 3:52 pm
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram