- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:10 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
I too can’t wait to have my data harvested to be used in every GOPE/RINO voting operation from here to infinity.
Did somebody put a gun to your head?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:10 pm to KCT
Made a post in the Q thread on the three year delta of the first drop. Responded to a few follow up posts and next thing you know I was gone.
But I still think Chicken and Company should be able to ban me for breaking a rule, even if I vehemently disagree with the rule and believe it does more harm than good (by letting you guys work yourself into a frenzy with no opposition in that thread).
The alternative is a government agency overseeing social media content regulation or the outright rescission of 230 which would lead to Chicken having to censor literally everything. Your post to me before this one, where you called me a #LOSER, could be actionable and I could sue TD for publishing it. Right now they have immunity due to Section 230, but if it’s pulled then they would have a harder time being dismissed from the suit. That will lead to outright, objective censorship like you’ve never seen.
If I don’t like how Chicken is running his board, I’m free to go find another board to post on.
Conservatives need to build out their own IT infrastructure and platforms. That’s the free market fix to this.
But I still think Chicken and Company should be able to ban me for breaking a rule, even if I vehemently disagree with the rule and believe it does more harm than good (by letting you guys work yourself into a frenzy with no opposition in that thread).
The alternative is a government agency overseeing social media content regulation or the outright rescission of 230 which would lead to Chicken having to censor literally everything. Your post to me before this one, where you called me a #LOSER, could be actionable and I could sue TD for publishing it. Right now they have immunity due to Section 230, but if it’s pulled then they would have a harder time being dismissed from the suit. That will lead to outright, objective censorship like you’ve never seen.
If I don’t like how Chicken is running his board, I’m free to go find another board to post on.
Conservatives need to build out their own IT infrastructure and platforms. That’s the free market fix to this.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:11 pm to KCT
I wouldn’t volunteer to be on anyone’s list
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:12 pm to Floki
quote:
I did it but AT&T will probably block his number.
...and then put you on a list and limit your phone to emergency service only.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:18 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Made a post in the Q thread on the three year delta of the first drop. Responded to a few follow up posts and next thing you know I was gone.
But I still think Chicken and Company should be able to ban me for breaking a rule, even if I vehemently disagree with the rule and believe it does more harm than good (by letting you guys work yourself into a frenzy with no opposition in that thread).
The alternative is a government agency overseeing social media content regulation or the outright rescission of 230 which would lead to Chicken having to censor literally everything. Your post to me before this one, where you called me a #LOSER, could be actionable and I could sue TD for publishing it. Right now they have immunity due to Section 230, but if it’s pulled then they would have a harder time being dismissed from the suit. That will lead to outright, objective censorship like you’ve never seen.
If I don’t like how Chicken is running his board, I’m free to go find another board to post on.
Conservatives need to build out their own IT infrastructure and platforms. That’s the free market fix to this.
All this shite, and I simply asked you what you did to get booted this last time.

You get booted because you're a troll and an insufferable prick. This board doesn't even try to police trolls, which makes your perpetual bannings all the more laughable.
Our 1st Amendment rights are going to be slaughtered by the unholy trinity of Dems/Big Tech/Corporate Media. Are you aware that they're even harassing (punishing) Brandon Straka?
I know you think "right-wing zealots" such as myself deserve to be silenced. But, how can you defend them going against Brandon Straka? How can you defend the suppression of Parler?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:29 pm to KCT
quote:
You get booted because you're a troll
False. Satire and rubbing to an extreme is not a troll. Unless you thought Jonathan Swift really thought they should eat babies.
quote:.
an insufferable prick
I don’t suffer fools well which explains why you and I are always in a tussle. I’m actually pretty laid back and easy to get along with for most people. I don’t think you can say the same.
quote:
Our 1st Amendment rights are going to be slaughtered by the unholy trinity of Dems/Big Tech/Corporate Media. Are you aware that they're even harassing (punishing) Brandon Straka?
You don’t have First Amendment rights as it pertains to social media.
quote:
I know you think "right-wing zealots" such as myself deserve to be silenced. But, how can you defend them going against Brandon Straka? How can you defend the suppression of Parler?
I don’t think you should be silenced at all. I think the answer to “bad” speech is more speech. I think it would be fantastic if Amazon and Twitter lost 75 million customers overnight.
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:35 pm to boosiebadazz
TY i needed this laugh

quote:
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Satire and rubbing to an extreme is not a troll
But, herein lies the rub. You ABSOLUTELY SUCK at satire. Bottom-line? You don't even come close to possessing the intellect to successfully engineer your little act.
Sorry if the truth hurts.

Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:43 pm to KCT
quote:
TY i needed this laugh
quote:
Granny Boomer
Why didn't you just email boosie? You and I both know you have it. In fact, I'd be willing to bet you have NORTH of 50 email addresses from posters here.

Hell, even I have it. You won't be getting any correspondence from me, thought, Chat-Room Cheryl.

Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:49 pm to KCT
Not many can do it like you can. Your multi-year portrayal of a deranged fishing shirt chucklefrick with anger issues has been magnificent.
Only one giving you a run for your money is BoarEd.
Only one giving you a run for your money is BoarEd.
Back to top
