Started By
Message

re: Tariffs on importers from China going to 25% Friday, apparently

Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:29 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293053 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

America first ! frick China !


You're definitely more of a liberal than conservative.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55355 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Tariffs provide neither.

The washing machine industry was propped up at a cost of over $815,000 for job



LMAO!


Here we go again.


Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
41290 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Trade between nations , even if unilateral benefits a nation greatly and makes one wealthier.


Trade with China is not balanced.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65100 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:34 pm to

The washing machine industry was propped up at a cost



Rinse/repeat
Posted by Tesla
the Laurentian Abyss
Member since Dec 2011
9047 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

by I B Freeman


Good grief. Don’t you ever get tired of being wrong in this one topic?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293053 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Trade with China is not balanced.


Trade imbalances are a sign of increasing wealth

If your job cost more money by government intervention to create than it is a benefit to the consumer, it is a net negative to capital resources.

It's an economic destroyer, not creator.
Posted by Tesla
the Laurentian Abyss
Member since Dec 2011
9047 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Over or under 1000 point loss on Dow.


So, I take it you’ll be shorting your life’s savings Monday?
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:39 pm to
I haven’t been wrong yet except when I predicted Trump was coming to his senses and the trade war would soon be over.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:41 pm to
If I could short the index today I would. It is going to open down in a huge way unless he tweets some retraction.

The general attitude was this deal was done and now it is obvious it is not.

If he puts the 25% on and expands the list to include real finished goods (these have been spared tariffs for the most part) it will cost him the election.
This post was edited on 5/5/19 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Tesla
the Laurentian Abyss
Member since Dec 2011
9047 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

I haven’t been wrong yet except when I predicted Trump was coming to his senses and the trade war would soon be over.


Wait, what? Weren’t you the poster who has predicted immediate doom since the day the tariffs were announced? Are you using Bernie as a financial advisor because you two are the only ones who can’t see how successful this has been for the economy.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Weren’t you the poster who has predicted immediate doom since the day the tariffs were announced?

maybe you should get some clarity on his actual position before deciding on what his position has been on your own
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

The general attitude was this deal was done and now it is obvious it is not.

probably wasn't even close, despite the repeated delays he already granted
quote:

If he puts the 25% on and expands the list to include real finished goods (these have been spared tariffs for the most part) it will cost him the election.

i don't know about all that though
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:49 pm to
These tariffs have added NOTHING to the economy.

I was the one that pointed out the huge reserve currencies the Chinese have giving them a tool to fight any tariffs.

I guarantee you Boeing’s arse is tight right now and they are ringing Ross’s phone.

It would help Trump if he could actually deliver a trade deal—he has not. I suspect that 2 trillion in spending he announced with Pelosi is a tool he is trying to use to bribe the dems to pass USMCA.

Doesn’t take a lot of negotiation skill to buy votes.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:52 pm to
They will be much more apparent at retail. Finished electronics for example have not been tariffed yet.

This will cause importing manufacturers and distributors to scream across the country.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

They will be much more apparent at retail. Finished electronics for example have not been tariffed yet.


he was still holding off on that one per the tweet

pretty sure he was just talking about going to 25 on the stuff that's at 10 now

but yeah, that one would be more directly noticeable, although i think china would actually bear some of the incidence of the tariffs on that retail-heavy stuff. (i assume you saw the report where they estimated posthoc that the entire brunt of the ones so far have been borne by us consumers, not us producers, and not foreign producers. exactly contrary to what trump's saying here, but of course that's no surprise)
This post was edited on 5/5/19 at 1:59 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:59 pm to
2–1 this trade war ends quickly if China cancels their Boeing orders.
This post was edited on 5/5/19 at 2:00 pm
Posted by Tiger Roux
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
5018 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 2:15 pm to
I don't see it lasting long. No way China can let the jobs shift to India and other low cost labor countries. They will never get it back.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 2:17 pm to
No way Boeing losses a order is the more appropriate argument.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

No way China can let the jobs shift to India and other low cost labor countries

no it's all supposed to come back to the us of a
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
43823 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

It's a de facto tax on American citizens


Our small gov’t Rs love protectionist tariffs (taxes).
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram