- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:38 am to imjustafatkid
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:38 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
If they're voting Democrat, this is an indictment of IQ testing.
I didn't say they voted DEM
1
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:39 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Google is your friend
It was that easy since they are non profit
How do you determine what % the snitches kept for themselves and what % flowed to the group? I didn't see that breakdown in the indictment
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:40 am to Jbird
quote:
Member since Jan 2004
475190 posts ?
Blew through the 475K in mere days!
About 475,100 are him stating "I never said that".
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:42 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
If they're voting Democrat, this is an indictment of IQ testing.
Surveys were taken...it must have been 15 years ago....most higher IQ people were libertarian in leaning. Notice the small "l" and not the big "L".
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I didn't say they voted DEM
If they don't vote Republican or Democrat, their vote goes to whoever wins the election. They're simply fooling themselves into believing they're doing something else.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:45 am to SlowFlowPro
The “snitches” are also the leaders and organizers
Do you miss the irony of the point you are reaching to make?
Do you miss the irony of the point you are reaching to make?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:45 am to UtahCajun
quote:
Surveys were taken...it must have been 15 years ago....most higher IQ people were libertarian in leaning. Notice the small "l" and not the big "L".
This makes sense.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:45 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
If they don't vote Republican or Democrat, their vote goes to whoever wins the election. They're simply fooling themselves into believing they're doing something else.
Speaking of low-IQ commentary
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:46 am to Old Sarge
quote:
The “snitches” are also the leaders and organizers
Assuming this to be true, you didn't answer the question.
A leader of an organization snitching on the organization is exactly the type to pocket 100% of the money.
What evidence do you have for the split? The indictment doesn't say, and that's all we have to go on.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
You’ve lost any reasonable grasp on reality
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Speaking of low-IQ commentary
Quite the opposite, actually. Not voting, or voting for people who have no possible chance to win, is simply giving up and allowing the chips to fall where they may. You are giving your vote to the person who wins.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:48 am to Old Sarge
quote:
You’ve lost any reasonable grasp on reality
I take you you're not going to answer the question?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:48 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
You are giving your vote to the person who wins.
With your logic, every vote goes to the person who wins.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
The leader of the group accepting the money only furthers the case for SPLC directing and influencing the causes they are falsely portraying themselves to be against
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:51 am to Old Sarge
quote:
The leader of the group accepting the money only furthers the case for SPLC directing and influencing the causes they are falsely portraying themselves to be against
Does the indictment contain specific language alleging that the SPLC directed or influenced the organizations?
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 11:52 am
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Does the indictment contain specific language alleging that the SPLC directed or influenced the organizations?
Yes…for the Unite the Right Rally in organizing and providing transportation.
Which is one more specific example than we have of the information these “snitches” were paid millions for.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 11:56 am
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:58 am to 4x4tiger
quote:
There's still a KKK? I've lived in the deep south all of my life and never met or heard rumors of any
The only KKK member I have ever met was David Duke. His daughter Erika and I partied together, 20 yrs ago, and I would go pick her up sometimes. He was a pretty cool dude every time I talked to him.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
With your logic, every vote goes to the person who wins.
If one ignores mathematical reality, it could be viewed this way. But we all know there are candidates who cannot mathematically win. Giving those candidates your vote is simply forfeiting your vote to the victor. Maybe the victor would have been your second choice, maybe not. Either way, you stepped aside and gave that person your vote.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:01 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
Yes…for the Unite the Right Rally in organizing and providing transportation.
It says F37 was a member of the org that planned the UTR event, not that SPLC directed him to organize it.
It says they directed him to ATTEND the event, which doesn't qualify
So if your best argument is that in this ENTIRE scheme, the only influence/direction of SPLC with one of these orgs is one snitch transporting a few people to UTR, then I win this one.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:02 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
If one ignores mathematical reality, it could be viewed this way. But we all know there are candidates who cannot mathematically win.
So all Trump voters in CA voted for Kamala?
Page 15 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News