Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Soundland "QPQ" claim not about Infamous Call or Ukraine Funding but about WH Meeting

Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:30 am
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19810 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:30 am
quote:

Mr. Giuliani’s requests were a quid pro quo for arranging a White House visit for President Zelensky. Mr. Giuliani demanded that Ukraine make a public statement announcing investigations of the 2016 election/DNC server and Burisma



quote:

But Sondland will dispute the accounts of former White House official Fiona Hill and Lt. Col. Alex Vindman, the Ukraine director in the White House






ETA: Quote from Rudy

quote:

I came into this at Volker’s request. Sondland is speculating based on VERY little contact. I never met him and had very few calls with him, mostly with Volker.

Volker testified I answered their questions and described them as my opinions, NOT demands. I.E., no quid pro quo!
This post was edited on 11/20/19 at 11:43 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73790 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:32 am to
bmy
Posted by the_watcher
Jarule's House
Member since Nov 2005
3450 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Mr. Giuliani’s requests were a quid pro quo for arranging a White House visit for President Zelensky. Mr. Giuliani demanded that Ukraine make a public statement announcing investigations of the 2016 election/DNC server and Burisma

Was a public statement ever made?
-no
Was the aid still given?
-yes

Thank you for your time
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Mr. Giuliani demanded that Ukraine make a public statement announcing investigations of the 2016 election/DNC server and Burisma

Which never happened...lol
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17754 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:36 am to
in legal terms this is known as a derp. Maybe even a herp derp.

Schiff seems to specialize in this
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19810 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Sondland said US delegation was enthused about the new government. "Unfortunately, President Trump was skeptical. He expressed concerns that the Ukrainian government was not serious about reform. He even mentioned that Ukraine tried to take him down in the last election"
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:53 am to
I have been saying this the entire time
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36065 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:53 am to
quote:

bmy

Would allow Joe and Hunter to take turns.
Posted by DyeHardDylan
Member since Nov 2011
7730 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:21 am to
It would be stupid to impeach Trump because he didn't invite a foreign leader to the White House. If this is the quid pro quo, it's pretty desperate.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:28 am to
quote:

It would be stupid to impeach Trump because he didn't invite a foreign leader to the White House. If this is the quid pro quo, it's pretty desperate.

Is this like telling my yard boy the only way your're going to get your money is by actually showing up at my house and doing some work? Is that pqp? Sounds like it.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19810 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:36 am to
quote:

I came into this at Volker’s request. Sondland is speculating based on VERY little contact. I never met him and had very few calls with him, mostly with Volker.

Volker testified I answered their questions and described them as my opinions, NOT demands. I.E., no quid pro quo!


Quote from Rudy
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram