re: Some ????'s for lefties/greenies/GW supporters

Nebraska agrees with this thread.

how about

quote:

---

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp. 2765-2776, March 2010)
- T. Bondo, M. B. Enghoff, H. Svensmark

---

quote:

---

Cosmic-ray-driven electron-induced reactions of halogenated molecules adsorbed on ice surfaces: Implications for atmospheric ozone depletion
(Physics Reports, Volume 487, Issue 5, pp. 141-167, February 2010)
- Qing-Bin Lu

---

quote:

---

The impact of cosmic dust on the Earth’s climate
(Moscow University Physics Bulletin, Volume 64, Number 2, pp. 214-217, April 2009)
- V. I. Ermakov et al.

---

quote:

---

A comparison of local and aggregated climate model outputs with observed data
(Hydrological Sciences Journal, Volume 55, Issue 7, pp. 1094-111, October 2010)
- G. G. Anagnostopoulos, D. Koutsoyiannis, A. Christofides, A. Efstratiadis, N. Mamassis

---

quote:

---

Why Hasn't Earth Warmed as Much as Expected? (PDF)
(Journal of Climate, Volume 23, Issue 10, pp. 2453–2464, May 2010)
- Stephen E. Schwartz et al.

---

Also as far as the Singer/Idso thing goes, it would be nice if you could link some of their work so we could actually see what the hell you are talking about. You say they are paid by industry (tobacco companies, smoking, etc) but you haven't provided any info to support your claim

quote:

---

That we tell a far different story from the one espoused by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is true; and that may be why ExxonMobil made some donations to us a few times in the past; they probably liked what we typically had to say about the issue. But what we had to say then, and what we have to say now, came not, and comes not, from them or any other organization or person. Rather, it was and is derived from our individual scrutinizing of the pertinent scientific literature and our analyses of what we find there, which we have been doing and subsequently writing about on our website on a weekly basis without a single break since 15 Jul 2000, and twice-monthly before that since 15 Sep 1998 ... and no one could pay my sons and me enough money to do that. [...]

---

LINK

Why should we not believe Idso or Singer because they offer a different opinion (please link some of singers studies on second hand smoke I really want to read them and ACTUALLY LOOK AT HIS DATA), but believe the IPCC that admits their models were off and exaggerated?

ETA: sorry for the earlier links in this post. I meant to hit quote not links, didn't have my coffee this morning it was rough.

and I though GW was President Bush