- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So the judge in the case against Michael Cohen was the officiant for George Soros' wedding
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:54 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:54 pm to BBONDS25
quote:I limit my homophobic slurs to insults of the Commander in Chief, than you very much.
You are the same guy that makes homophobic slurs, right?
0
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:54 pm to BBONDS25
Yep. I’m really a lawyer. Pretty damn good one, too.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:55 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
If I agreed with you, and frankly I don’t, I’d point out that the chief judge of the SDNY chose Judge Wood to oversee this issue, and the chief judge is a Clinton appointee.
Who is the chief judge of the SDNY?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:56 pm to BBONDS25
Colleen McMahon
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:58 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Reading your posts. No way you are actually a lawyer. Just saying Do you claim to actually be a lawyer??
Ask me anything. You wanna talk Burford abstention? Diversity removal? Erie doctrine (and Klaxon)? Preemption and the 10th Amendment? How bout OCSLA adjacent state choice of law? Maybe renvoi?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:58 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Yep. I’m really a lawyer. Pretty damn good one, too.
I don't doubt it. I am not silly enough to pretend that there are some posters that are damn good lawyers. I'm a tax litigator....so I don't pretend to know all the ins and outs of fed conflicts. But presiding over soros' wedding seems to be a pretty clear one. No?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:59 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Ask me anything. You wanna talk Burford abstention? Diversity removal? Erie doctrine (and Klaxon)? Preemption and the 10th Amendment? How bout OCSLA adjacent state choice of law? Maybe renvoi?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:59 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:00 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
But presiding over soros' wedding seems to be a pretty clear one. No?
I don’t see it. Soros isn’t a party. Privilege is a pretty apolitical issue.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:01 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Are you kidding? If the judge is dirty it taints everything. You guys are insane.
Are you kidding?
Wood was the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York from 2006-2009, when she took senior status.
She had a special appointment to hear the motions on the Cohen subpoena matter.
You think they should bump she because she presided at Soros' wedding?
That is laughable.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:01 pm to Dale51
quote:
No Shjt?? How deep does this rabbit hole of numbnuttery go??
Imagine the craziest shite ever...its worse.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:02 pm to BBONDS25
quote:What specifically is the conflict? What facts would you use to convince a smart and seasoned judge?
I don't doubt it. I am not silly enough to pretend that there are some posters that are damn good lawyers. I'm a tax litigator....so I don't pretend to know all the ins and outs of fed conflicts. But presiding over soros' wedding seems to be a pretty clear one. No?
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:02 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Privilege is a pretty apolitical issue pre-trump
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:03 pm to PointsInCase
Foreign influence on a judge in a case involving the lawyer of the President.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:04 pm to PointsInCase
Presiding over soros' wedding shows a connection to soros. Given the appearance of impropriety it would be prudent to recuse.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:05 pm to BBONDS25
The appearance of impropriety is the basis for recusal. Even if there is no actual issue...the fed code states that the appearance is sufficient.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:06 pm to texridder
quote:
That is laughable.
Well let’s take old BBBond’s side for a sec.
This is plainly a highly politicized issue. The president’s own communications with his lawyer are at issue. Soros is a known political opponent, and a fairly bitter one, of the president. How the privilege is handled could have a significant impact on the presidential popularity, and it’s an election year in which his party is in jeopardy of losing the House. If the judge has an intimate connection wit a leftist rival, reasonable people could question her impartiality.
That’s the pitch I’d make. I don’t buy it, but it might pass Rule 11. How you like me now, BB?
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
JD. Prosecuted for years. Clerked for a federal judge. LLM after.
I can't say this any other way.
There is absolutely no way -- ZERO CHANCE -- you clerked for a federal judge.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:07 pm to BBONDS25
Pointsincase is clearly not a lawyer. Judge Holden may be. Your thoughts?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 11:07 pm to Dale51
quote:
No Shjt?? How deep does this rabbit hole of numbnuttery go??
I spent the last year trying to research all of it going back to the very beginning, thousands of years ago....trying to piece it all together...sorting fact from fiction.
Every time I find one answer, 2 more puzzles pop up.
It truly is a massive, historic conspiracy.
It is the Great Red Herring.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News