- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/23/19 at 1:20 pm to ShortyRob
Im not ducking anything. I gave you your answer: State/Justice should be the avenue taken, should he want to see this investigated. You dismissed it and then told me how i would react if that happened. Im not playing your dumb, and obvious, game.
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 9/23/19 at 1:25 pm to 9th life
quote:
State/Justice should be the avenue taken,
Obama and Biden disagree.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 1:39 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
But, NO ONE has fricking provided ANY actual mechanism for addressing activity such as this if their argument is that Trump cannot.
Trump: The devil made me do it.
Trump lemmings: Biden made him do it.
TRUMP AUTHORITARIAN SYNDROME - (TAS) -- A personality disorder that makes followers of an authoritarian figure believe everything he says, even if it's a proven lie....
Posted on 9/23/19 at 4:14 pm to 9th life
quote:
ou dismissed it and then told me how i would react if that happened
It's quite telling that this is about the fifth time you've pointed out that I dismissed it but conveniently haven't officially stated you would have been okay with him using Barr to go after Biden.
Things that make ya go hmmmmmmm
Posted on 9/23/19 at 6:26 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 9/23/19 at 6:42 pm to 9th life
quote:You mean like when reporters asked the State Dept spokesperson about it in 2014 or so and she said;
The correct answer is through his DOJ and/or State department. you dont want to hear that though, and have dismissed it as a possiblity.
keep up the good work.
"he's a private citizen. Why would that concern us?" or something like that. Pretty much the same answer when the White House Press Robot was asked the same thing about the same time.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 6:45 pm to Diamondawg
No.
i mean like the direct answer to the question posed in the OP. That was the context i meant it.
Glad i could clear that up.
i mean like the direct answer to the question posed in the OP. That was the context i meant it.
Glad i could clear that up.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 6:52 pm to 9th life
So what you meant was that the State Dept and DOJ should have looked into it in 2014, but didn't? Thanks for clearing that up.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 6:57 pm to 9th life
Was Trump? Cause right now it’s a bunch of hearsay garbage.
I think you are going to be disappointed once again.
I think you are going to be disappointed once again.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 6:58 pm to Diamondawg
Dropping in your vague recollection on the gist of something someone said from five years ago? You didnt clear up shite.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:04 pm to 9th life
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:07 pm to 9th life
quote:
The IRS targeting conservative PACs comes to mind, not exactly his admin's best look,
There is a tremendous difference between using agencies under your control to look for dirt on political opponents when no apparent evidence is available and asking the correct jurisdiction to investigation a political opponent where a plethora of evidence already exists.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:13 pm to 9th life
quote:
. I gave you your answer: State/Justice should be the avenue taken,
Why?
That’s a stupid opinion.
Why would we use an American agency under the control of the opposing party of the target when 1) the foreign government has a better claim to jurisdiction, 2) the foreign government has better access to evidence and witnesses, and 3) the investigation would not involve American politicos more interested in power than determining whether a crime took place?
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:13 pm to Diamondawg
Im not sure what you are trying to argue.
Rob asked what is the mechanism for beginning an investigation, if trump cant ask directly himself.
I said through state dept and doj.
You linked a video of an interview asking if state dept was concerned with the perception of hunter bidens involvement being croneyism. This still nameless spokesperson said he is a private citizen.
How do you view the answer to that question as some type of gotcha?
Rob asked what is the mechanism for beginning an investigation, if trump cant ask directly himself.
I said through state dept and doj.
You linked a video of an interview asking if state dept was concerned with the perception of hunter bidens involvement being croneyism. This still nameless spokesperson said he is a private citizen.
How do you view the answer to that question as some type of gotcha?
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:18 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
How about word for word recollection
LOL
9th is a complete joke in this thread
Has he made an affirmative statement YET that he would have been ok with Barr going after Biden on this?
ROFLMAO
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:20 pm to Antonio Moss
To ask for the investigation not to conduct it.
I know you are smart though, you’ll catch me slipping somewhere else.
I know you are smart though, you’ll catch me slipping somewhere else.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:23 pm to ShortyRob
i already said i dont care. Repeatedly.
Do better rob.
Do better rob.
Back to top
