Started By
Message

re: Single-payer would be a nightmare for Americans

Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:33 pm to
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Can you imagine telling an American he or she had to wait until 2019 to get a hip replacement. That would go over like a wet fart in church.

They are like most Americans, they do not believe that it will happen to themselves.

As long as it happens to someone else, they do not care.

However, when it does happen to them, they will raise holy hell like you have never seen, and will demand an exception be made for them.

I see it all the time at school board and city council meetings.
Posted by Lightning
Texas
Member since May 2014
3118 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

Stop thinking your good decisions make you immune from a lightning strike.


You want to charge the fool standing on the roof waving a golf club in a thunderstorm the same amount for coverage as the person sitting inside listening to the weather radio.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63249 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

You crossed that bar a page or two ago.
Nah. You simply don't know the definition of rationed.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63249 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

If we paid into the national health what we already pay in premiums, the heath service would be totally flush.
Not even close. Just have a look at what Medi-x spends today to cover only a portion of the population. And understand it does so only by shifting cost to others that are forced to pay an artificially raised price.
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 9:01 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63249 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

Big Insurance Greed has guaranteed the failure of ObamaCare,
Actually... no. It's the greed of those expecting, demanding, and receiving "free" care that are causing its failure.

quote:

What can possibly work other than single payor?
Lierally nothing will work. One cannot give away trillions of dollars in "free" stuff and have it remain affordable to those left to carry the burden for paying for it.

Anyone telling you otherwise is selling you magic thoughts. Or outright lying to you.
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 9:05 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63249 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

Health is rarely a poor choice, and often random chance.
What did heathy people do to deserve the added burden?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63249 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Is this really the mindset of those trying to change healthcare?
its all about the emotional "it would happen to you!" Fear, sells legislations and buys votes. Gets people to open their wallets too. Classic con-man technique.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63249 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Health is rarely a poor choice, and often random chance.
Non-compliant diabetics say hello.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138519 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

That adds expense?
How?


LINK
Wow!
So in your opinion, translation services account for the extraordinary foundational cost difference in the US vs EU. I guess it would follow that the NHS only treats English-speaking patients? France only treats French speaking patients? Germany only treats German speaking patients?

Hmmm?
Yeah, may be not.
quote:

rural medicine is expensive
Link?


LINK
As far as I can tell, your link addresses nothing related to elevated per capita cost of rural medicine as opposed to that in more populated areas. It simply addresses medicaid paying for it.

I know this is a complicated precept for you, but if the underlying cost of a procedure, pharmaceutical, or medical device is 2-3 fold higher than similar service abroad, 3rd party payer costs (medicaid, medicare, universal care, single payer, or private insurance) will be reflective of that. The nature of the payer is nearly inconsequential at the EU:US foundational cost spread.

The related question to you was "is the underlying cost of rural care a unique US per capita cost driver?" You claimed it was. Instead of backing that claim, you responded with a link related to coverage, not per capita cost.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138519 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Conversely, if the NHS was burdened with foundational American costs, it would run 2-to-3-fold the cost it does in the UK.


Link?

You've been so dishonest on everything related to this issue, it's time you backed up your 'facts' with some sources.
:Sigh:

I thought you'd have a modicum of self respect and at least try to look something up. Alas, no.





























Pacemaker insertion US ( LINK) vs International ( LINK)

Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:43 pm to
What are you trying to say?
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 9:45 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138519 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

What are you trying to say?
US healthcare expense will be high regardless of who pays for it, unless and until we address the underlying cause of expense. Single payer, Medicare, private insurance, it won't matter.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:14 pm to
BamaProg will simply retort that the government can force drug companies at gunpoint to sell their product at whatever rate the government chooses, as well as regulate the price of the services like MRIs -- and the providers (that would be you, Doc).
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83784 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

quote:


quote:

If the government avoids rationing then the costs would be astronomical.




This is not true.



...how is this not true?
I would like to know the answer to this, please?
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 10:20 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138519 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

BamaProg will simply retort that the government can force drug companies at gunpoint to sell their product at whatever rate the government chooses
They could do that now. They aren't. That is the point.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:24 pm to
Oh? The FDA or other fed gov agency sets drug prices?

Edit: "Has the power to..."
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 10:25 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138519 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

The FDA or other fed gov agency sets drug prices?
Insofar as they limit consumer options and international pricing competition, yes.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram