- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sidney Powell’s Legal Defense Dominates Dominion
Posted on 4/1/21 at 4:01 am
Posted on 4/1/21 at 4:01 am
quote:
The supreme “Art of War” is to subdue your enemy without fighting; it means having the ability to set an inescapable trap – enabling the ability to annihilate the enemy. In fictional novels, the process can be analogized to a successfully foreshadowed climax. Some only see the strategy set up in hindsight.
In chess, champions yell “checkmate.”
quote:
The lawsuit against Powell was brought in Washington, D.C., a politically questionable and legally improper place for a Colorado company to sue a Texan. The burn of political interference in the D.C. circuit is something Sidney Powell is especially experienced with. As per Dominion, Ms. Powell is alleged to have made “wild accusations” and “outlandish claims” about the company – claims that could only be verified using data from Dominion via a pre-trial discovery process and argued in court.
Powell’s legal arguments are sound. A proper trial may shed a sufficient amount of light to put to bed questions surrounding the election. Her strategy seems, in hindsight, supreme.
quote:
Despite the immediate outcry and disingenuous legacy media reporting, her recent motion to dismiss or change venue could affirm decisive legal protection for private citizens against entities that have been considered or labeled “public figures” under N.Y. Times Co. These entities are different from government officials, such as politicians, with the latter not having to guarantee the truth of their factual assertions. Politicians are practically unable to defend against defamation. If they could, some media would be bankrupt after the last four years. Now, thankfully, when public figures engage in the deprivation of constitutionally protected rights of private citizens, Americans can reap monetary damages.
quote:
Evidence used by Ms. Powell is not only backed by private experts, it is backed by the federal government and many state governments — from both sides of the aisle.
quote:
Unfortunately, too, for Dominion, the D.C. Circuit agreed with Ms. Powell this past week in a differing opinion regarding the defamation against her. As the D.C. Circuit noted, “[o]ur court… has made clear that evidence of ill will is insufficient by itself to support a finding of actual malice.” With the mountains of evidence supplied by Ms. Powell, it is clear her claims are not the ones that may seem to contain malice.
quote:
The vices executed in this pending trial-trap are so beautiful, it is hard to write a better story. The applicable state law for Dominion’s claims against Ms. Powell and others is Colorado. Certain laws can be tried under the relevant state’s laws in federal courts between citizens from different states. Unless federal law preempts, stronger state laws are ones that can apply. In this case, because Colorado is making the claims, Colorado’s law applies, even in Texas. Colorado’s Supreme Court and Constitution have stronger and more vibrant First Amendment protections and case precedents than even the United States Constitution and Supreme Court. The forum, which is crucial in jury selection for trials, is in freedom-loving Texas.
Checkmate.
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/03/31/sidney-powells-legal-defense-dominates-dominion/
Dominion fricked, Sidney Stacked.
Posted on 4/1/21 at 4:22 am to DownHome
tl,dr:
dominion hired another law firm (adding many lawyers) to the case after reading sydney's filing.
dominion is fricked and they know it. they are trying to use msm as their ally.
honest Americans need to help spread the truth
dominion hired another law firm (adding many lawyers) to the case after reading sydney's filing.
dominion is fricked and they know it. they are trying to use msm as their ally.
honest Americans need to help spread the truth
Posted on 4/1/21 at 5:52 am to DownHome
Weird. I thought she said no one would take her claims seriously.
Posted on 4/1/21 at 5:58 am to squid_hunt
That’s what the media reported
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:03 am to DownHome
I have never understood why Dominion sued a Texan in DC.
That is a huge problem. I cannot see how this case isn’t transferred.
Plus the argument about Dominion being the one with malice is stellar.
Enjoyed this article
That is a huge problem. I cannot see how this case isn’t transferred.
Plus the argument about Dominion being the one with malice is stellar.
Enjoyed this article
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:08 am to arseinclarse
quote:
That’s what the media reported
So she didn't say that?
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:10 am to Wednesday
Thanks for weighing in. In terms of expertise my weakness is your strength.
That is a reason I love this board. There is diversity of experience that allows us all to be sometimes teachers, sometimes students.
That is a reason I love this board. There is diversity of experience that allows us all to be sometimes teachers, sometimes students.
This post was edited on 4/1/21 at 6:12 am
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:23 am to squid_hunt
quote:
That’s what the media reported
So she didn't say that?
not at all
as usual, the media took a quote from the legal documents, took it behind the democrat funded woodshed, raped it a few times, and then spit out what they wanted people to hear
any media outlet that reported what she "said" should be sued into bankruptcy.
but this has been happening for years with zero consequences to the media
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:25 am to ksayetiger
quote:
not at all
We'll see.
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:26 am to DownHome
I read it all, but to early to catch the BOOM...anyone break it down like I'm 5?
Also, can someone post the piece from last week that made news about what her response said regarding no reasonable person would believe? Or something like that. Plus the last part of it that the msms left out to make it sound worse. I couldn't find the thread with the discussion. TIA
Also, can someone post the piece from last week that made news about what her response said regarding no reasonable person would believe? Or something like that. Plus the last part of it that the msms left out to make it sound worse. I couldn't find the thread with the discussion. TIA
This post was edited on 4/1/21 at 6:28 am
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:30 am to DownHome
This post was edited on 4/1/21 at 6:32 am
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:48 am to squid_hunt
quote:
So she didn't say that?
She said no one would believe her accusations "without" looking at the EVIDENCE she has.
It would be like me saying I've captured Bigfoot standing beside a cage with a tarp over it. No one will believe me unless they look under the tarp. The courts have yet to look under the tarp.
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:51 am to Lg
quote:
She said no one would believe her accusations "without" looking at the EVIDENCE she has.
So when do we see that evidence? It's a little late in the game, don't you think? If I had evidence like that, it would have been released to everyone by now. What is the purpose in hiding it?
Maybe time to remove the tarp.
This post was edited on 4/1/21 at 6:52 am
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:55 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Weird. I thought she said no one would take her claims seriously.
No, that was some politards.
Posted on 4/1/21 at 7:01 am to ksayetiger
quote:
dominion hired another law firm (adding many lawyers) to the case after reading sydney's filing.
dominion is fricked and they know it. they are trying to use msm as their ally.
Starting to think Dominion is simply using the defamation suits as a calculated P.R. move knowing that they would face these steep 1st Amendment defamation burdens that wouldn't survive challenges on the pleadings.
Bring high profile suits against the lead players like Sidney, whose cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. Dominion's suits are hundreds of pages long with very detailed allegations- giving more rope to the defendants to hang it at the initial stages of litigation.
Who cares if ultimately dismissed under NYT v. Sullivan/Gertz and progeny- Dominion will have the same rebuttal of the Trump suit dismissals- standing, technicalities.
Dominion does not want to get into a protracted lawsuit involving discovery that would require extensive audits and delving into its sordid genealogy, but knew if it did not sue, it risked affirmation of allegations by silence.
Don't get me wrong- the brief filed by Sidney's legal team was brilliantly written and that they are using Colorado's stricter defamation standards against it is a very nice touch.
Posted on 4/1/21 at 7:01 am to squid_hunt
quote:
So when do we see that evidence? It's a little late in the game, don't you think? If I had evidence like that, it would have been released to everyone by now. What is the purpose in hiding it?
That's up to the courts. Ask them. Dominion might have just stepped in it by counter suing. They might have given the courts the rope to pull the tarp off.
Posted on 4/1/21 at 7:02 am to Lg
quote:
That's up to the courts.
Want to know how I know it's a con game?
It's not up to the courts. If she had any evidence, she could have released it months ago.
Posted on 4/1/21 at 7:03 am to squid_hunt
quote:
she could have released it months ago.
Released it to who?
Posted on 4/1/21 at 7:04 am to Lg
quote:
Released it to who?
The public. Donald Trump. He's had a pretty big platform since the election. Where is the evidence?
Posted on 4/1/21 at 7:04 am to squid_hunt
What is the Con? The only con game has been stealing elections.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News