- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should a person's right to own a firearm be revoked if he makes online threats?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:36 am
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:36 am
Yes or no?
4
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:38 am to Revelator
Same as a convicted felon that can get a gun off the street anytime, anywhere?
Evil people don’t adhere to laws.
Evil people don’t adhere to laws.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:40 am to Revelator
No, their right to free speech should be revoked..
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 6:41 am
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:41 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
No, their right to free speech should be revoked
Not all speech is protected.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:42 am to 4LSU2
quote:
Evil people don’t adhere to laws
Then why have any laws?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:43 am to Revelator
quote:
No, their right to free speech should be revoked Not all speech is protected.
I know.
Should a persons free speech rights be taken if they prove to use speech in a dangerous manner?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:44 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
I know. Should a persons free speech rights be taken if they prove to use speech in a dangerous manner?
No, but there should be consequences for death threats made online.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:45 am to Revelator
quote:
No, but there should be consequences for death threats made online.
I agree. Why do you feel the punishment should involve a potentially unrelated right and not the one that was abused?
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 6:46 am
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:47 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
I agree. Why do you feel they should be related to a potentially unrelated right and not the one that was abused?
I never made my feelings known about the thread topic. It's a poll. Plus felons lose their gun rights, so this is already happening.
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 6:48 am
Posted on 2/16/18 at 7:05 am to Revelator
Yes but under republican policies which make it perfectly legal to sell guns to people so mentally ill that they cannot even manage their affairs, no rational restrictions will ever be put in place.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 7:08 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
Should a persons free speech rights be taken if they prove to use speech in a dangerous manner?
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can fricking murder?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 7:11 am to Revelator
Considering it was just reported to the public last year that the cia and our ic has the capability of framing certain countries of hacking and planting info to make it appear of foul play I would venture to say hell no. A lot of people can compromise your social media and plant whatever they want.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 7:13 am to GoldenGuy
No, but they should be committed to a mental institution until they are deemed safe to the general population. This would create quite a dilemma for the ACLU.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 7:16 am to TBoy
quote:
Yes but under republican policies which make it perfectly legal to sell guns to people so mentally ill that they cannot even manage their affairs,
That's an absolute lie. All the law did was protect a person's right to due process.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News