- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:40 am to BamaAtl
quote:
It's a pretext to purge voter rolls of people Republicans don't believe will vote for them.
Yes, the dead.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:41 am to BamaAtl
quote:
The part where you mistakenly believe it will be equally administered.
are you suggesting that the voter registration/ID process is 'equally administered' as it currently exists?
The part where you believe it's necessary.
You believe it is not necessary to ensure honest elections?
quote:
The part where you conflate voter ID laws with voter registration fraud.
No conflation - two separate events leading to the same result = voter fraud. Call it what you want.
Why are you so adamant that the current big-city precinct process must be allowed to continue producing 110% voting margins for DEM candidates.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:42 am to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
Yes, the dead.
While the dead may be registered to vote, there is no indication that they are actually voting in any large number.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:43 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
are you suggesting that the voter registration/ID process is 'equally administered' as it currently exists?
Of course not. Voter ID laws are usually crafted in such a way as to be discriminatory on the basis of SES and race.
quote:
You believe it is not necessary to ensure honest elections?
I believe, and the facts support me, that voter ID laws are not necessary to ensure honest elections in the US
quote:
two separate events leading to the same result = voter fraud
Only one of those events seems to happen, and it's not the one that's prevented by voter ID laws. This is a pretty easy concept, should I use smaller words?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:44 am to Mr. Katanga
quote:
the 3 million he lost by
I thought is was 4 million?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:54 am to BamaAtl
quote:
While the dead may be registered to vote, there is no indication that they are actually voting in any large number.
That's impossible to determine if you are not requiring the voter to present a valid ID at the polling place.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:56 am to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
That's impossible to determine if you are not requiring the voter to present a valid ID at the polling place.
Very possible to determine if you check who voted vs death records like the SSDI.
Or did you not think this one through?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:58 am to BamaAtl
quote:
actually voting in any large number.
so there IS fraud....
what is a large number to you? 3 Million???
Posted on 1/25/17 at 7:59 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Very possible to determine if you check who voted vs death records like the SSDI. Or did you not think this one through?
Great idea. Let's have the Feds purge the rolls based on SSDI information.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:00 am to UGATiger26
The media doesn't want us to find out the truth on this one
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:01 am to UGATiger26
I would laugh my arse off if 2.9 million votes were proven to be illegal, and the media touted as a victory because Trump lied about it being 3-5 million.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:03 am to tigerskin
Any one caught doing this type of activity should face very stiff penalties including Prison.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:04 am to Mr. Katanga
quote:Well that escalated quickly.
He's looking to finger the 3 million he lost by you fricking idiot. He doesn't care about democracy and it's well being.
God, what a Board of simpletons.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:05 am to DawgCountry
quote:
what is a large number to you? 3 Million???
That would be a large number.
The evidence we have suggests in-person fraud is around 1 per 1 billion votes.
Is that a large enough number to you to disenfranchise millions of Americans?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:06 am to the808bass
quote:
Let's have the Feds purge the rolls based on SSDI information.
Feds don't control voter rolls, the states do.
Why do you always want a larger government?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:07 am to BamaAtl
Voter ID: Berkeley vs Harlem
quote:
Voter ID laws are usually crafted in such a way as to be discriminatory on the basis of SES and race
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:09 am to BamaAtl
Baby steps. Bama admits there is voting fraud folks 
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:09 am to BamaAtl
1). You admit that SSDI isn't used in checking the voter rolls.
2). If the Feda control the SSDI data, they could easily provide the info to the states to do the process themselves. Might even kick in federal funding to support the process. Any state which didn't comply would lose a portion of their funding.
2). If the Feda control the SSDI data, they could easily provide the info to the states to do the process themselves. Might even kick in federal funding to support the process. Any state which didn't comply would lose a portion of their funding.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 8:10 am to DawgCountry
quote:
there is voting fraud folks
31 cases over the period of 14 years (2000-2014) with well over a billion votes cast. Sure.
Is that enough to disenfranchise millions of people? For me, no. For you, seems so.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News