- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sen Graham says not enough votes to call Hunter Biden or the WB to testify
Posted on 12/10/19 at 6:22 pm to SirWinston
Posted on 12/10/19 at 6:22 pm to SirWinston
LINDSLEY has something to hide, he scared.
0
Posted on 12/10/19 at 6:22 pm to Contra
ENTIRE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT - PERIOD. And it has been our entire lives. Daddy Bush was in charge when his CIA Mafia killed JFK on behalf of LBJ and the Bankers.
If the People really knew what was going on, some of the so called "Patriots" might actually try to do something about it.
If the People really knew what was going on, some of the so called "Patriots" might actually try to do something about it.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 6:23 pm to jamboybarry
If that happens, which they wouldn't dare do, there would be a lot of them primaried next time.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 6:25 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
I don’t fully understand it either.
Graham is a dirty swamp rat just like the rest of them and he doesn't want to cast too many stones and have them boomerang back to him.
Remember Graham used to live with his head up McCain's arse
This post was edited on 12/10/19 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 12/10/19 at 6:34 pm to Eli Goldfinger
His remark regarding the votes is confusing.
He doesn't need the votes of the judiciary committee members before issuing a subpoena. And if he's referring to the impeachment trial then it's going to be Trump's lawyers calling the witnesses and not members of the senate.
At least I think that's how it plays out. I've never seen a senate trial so I could be wrong.
He doesn't need the votes of the judiciary committee members before issuing a subpoena. And if he's referring to the impeachment trial then it's going to be Trump's lawyers calling the witnesses and not members of the senate.
At least I think that's how it plays out. I've never seen a senate trial so I could be wrong.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 10:25 pm to MsHoghunter
quote:
Graham is a dirty swamp rat just like the rest of them and he doesn't want to cast too many stones and have them boomerang back to him.
I agree with this.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:37 am to Eli Goldfinger
The senate only gets to vote on the procedural rules to be followed. I am not sure they get to determine the amount of/or/ actual witnesses that can be put forth by the defense.
Of course, this recent statement gives pause for concern why Trump would want to make this a very painful process:
If this is a quick process, the house might just go again on some new charges.
Of course, this recent statement gives pause for concern why Trump would want to make this a very painful process:
quote:
Rep. Al Green, a Texas Democrat who earlier had introduced articles of impeachment against the president three times, felt similarly, telling The Washington Times he conveyed as much to his colleagues in a recent memo.
However, he wouldn’t say whether he planned to try to introduce additional articles before the House votes.
“We can wait to see if the Senate will convict and remove. But if they don’t, then there’s still work to be done,” he said.
If this is a quick process, the house might just go again on some new charges.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News