Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS set to take up major 2A gun case in the fall

Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by Sidicous
NELA
Member since Aug 2015
19296 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:08 pm to
quote:


You don’t need a license because a right does no require permission!
Isn't it racist to require an ID to enjoy the 2A?
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

I predict ACB writes opinion as a hat tip to her mentor.



I highly doubt it. A potentially major landmark decision like this will be written by the most senior justice or at least up there. It's not going to be given to the baby justice.

It's a contest between Thomas and Alito and assuming Roberts dissents, Alito will only get to write the opinion if Thomas, as the most senior justice in the majority assigns him the task of writing the opinion.

But given that Roberts was in the majority for Heller, I would not be surprised if he's in the majority for this one as well and if he is, it will be interesting to see how, if he does at all, tries to make the ruling narrow.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
16976 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:15 pm to
If Roberta writes it - he’ll just find a way to frick it up.

Even if he votes to uphold the 2A he’ll write a stupid concurrence that says it’s ok to tax it or something.

I can see ACB doing it- but if it’s not her- It will be Clarence
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Even if he votes to uphold the 2A he’ll write a stupid concurrence that says it’s ok to tax it or something.



If the chief justice is in the majority, he's entitled to write the opinion himself or he can choose to assign it to another justice of his choice that's also in the majority.

But the chief has first dibs on the opinion if he's in the majority.
Posted by Dennis Celery
Member since Apr 2021
708 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:28 pm to
frick every single gun control measure that’s ever been put into existence in this nation. Either the 2A means what it says as it says it or it doesn’t. Furthermore, until we get every single gun control measure on the books thrown out, our liberty on regarding the 2A is non-existent.

I’m a 2A absolutist. That means if I want a fricking fully functioning Abrams tank, I should be able to get a fricking fully functioning Abrams tank.
Posted by Bob Sacamano
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
5294 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:36 pm to
So whats the best case here? Shitty CA and NY state carry rules get over-ruled?

I applied for my CCW in San Diego. My first meeting with the sheriff is July 2022.

I also had to make up this good cause statement. Couldn't say for protection or that was instant denial.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18498 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

mean who is the State of NY to decide that you have to demonstrate a need "above and beyond" the general need to protect yourself?



So now we have to justify a constitutional right.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram