Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

SCOTUS says Trump admin can prevent immigration judges from giving amnesty

Posted on 10/27/26 at 7:23 pm
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
40185 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 7:23 pm
LINK

quote:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with the Trump administration in declining to restore a Biden-era rule that allowed immigration judges to suspend thousands of deportation cases. There were no noted dissents in the brief unsigned order. Joe Biden had allowed deportation cases to be vacated, allowing illegal aliens to remain the US with no real legal status.

At the center of the case was the regulation that provides “administrative closure,” which was adopted by the DOJ’s Executive Office for Immigration Review Executive Office for Immigration Review in 2024. The regulation allows immigration judges to shelve some deportation proceedings, such as for crime victims or those seeking asylum, per SCOTUSblog.

Texas sued the federal government over the regulation in June, saying that the administrative closure rule was “one part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s campaign to undermine our immigration laws.” Instead of defending the Biden-era regulation, the DOJ asked the court to enter a final judgment for the state that would see the regulation thrown out and an order issued that the EOIR could not adopt similar rules in the future. The requests were granted.

Three cities with large migrant populations filed an emergency petition in August. These were Baltimore, Maryland; New Haven, Connecticut; and Columbus, Ohio, as well as the migrant legal services group Centro Legal de la Raza. They were seeking to defend the Biden-era regulation, however, the judge denied their request, saying that they lacked the legal right to sue.

The petitioners went to the US Circuit of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which rejected their request to block the agreement between Texas and the DOJ. They went to the Supreme Court on October 9, claiming that the agreement between Texas and the DOJ was the product of “egregious collusion.”
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
57648 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 7:27 pm to
SCOTUS rules the president has the authority to prevent the destruction of the constitutional republic?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
119006 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

The petitioners went to the US Circuit of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which rejected their request to block the agreement between Texas and the DOJ.


Those sue and settle agreements suck when they're goring the Left's sacred cows.
Posted by BayouBandit24
Member since Aug 2010
17403 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 7:48 pm to
Immigration judges are not “real” federal judges how we would ordinarily think. They fall under the executive branch, not Article III, so this makes sense.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
18439 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 11:35 am to
quote:


SCOTUS rules the president has the authority to prevent the destruction of the constitutional republic


How nice of them.
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
5542 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 11:59 am to
This should be front page news.
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
498 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:07 pm to
Without legislation from Congress, a Dem President would have the power to tell the Judges to do exactly the opposite.

It is ping pong. Without Congressional action it has very little value in the long run.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram