Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS says "No Thanks" to Kim Davis and "Yes" to same sex marriage.

Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:08 pm to
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
10436 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:08 pm to
Government should have no business in marriage. I don’t agree with it, but let the gays marry. Freedom, baby.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
61916 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Government should have no business in marriage. I don’t agree with it, but let the gays marry.


These are competing statements.
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
10436 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

These are competing statements.


They should have no say so in any marriage. Therefore, the gays should be able to marry.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
61916 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

They should have no say so in any marriage. Therefore, the gays should be able to marry.


Congratulations, you agree with Kim Davis. The government should have no say so in any marriage.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45285 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

Isn't the US government supposed to be neutral in regards to religion?
According to the SCOTUS, yes. The federal government wasn't exactly "neutral" in its practices early on, calling for national prayer and fasting days, for instance.

quote:

England has something similar to what you're suggesting. It didn't turn out very well.
England had the King as the head of the Church. That's not what I'm advocating for at all.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26224 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 7:03 am to
quote:


Really? What about deciding how divorce works out? Who gets what? How are kids to be handled? Supported? What about who owns the home they live in? Should married couples file taxes as individuals?


Taxes separately.

Divorse: Since they both own the home. They both own the home. One can buy out the other. If not then they sale the home and split the money. No different than if two individuals buy a home together today.

Court system we have today can handle the kids if their is a dispute. Same as with unmarried couples that have kids today.

Who gets what? Whichever person own it gets it.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram