- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS just restored Trump’s constitutional power to remove rogue commissioners
Posted on 10/12/25 at 4:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/12/25 at 4:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That sounds like a straw man
Not a straw man. I asked you a specific question. We both know why you chose not to answer. There is no process in the legislation that allows Congress to remove anyone from an "independent agency". Because its created to be independent, aka unaccountable
So how would that work exactly? A sub-committee would vote to remove someone? Lulz
Another question you wont answer
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:37 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Not a straw man
I asked for your example of Congress saying, "Well they are independent. We cant intervene"
quote:
We both know why you chose not to answer.
The question prior to that, I said was irrelevant.
quote:
There is no process in the legislation that allows Congress to remove anyone from an "independent agency".
Sure there is. That process is the basic legislative process.
Congress could unwind the Fed (assuming no veto from the President), even.
But all of this is irrelevant and ignores the Executive's role.
quote:
Another question you wont answer
You're creating a strawman, then using ignorance to add more strawman layers to it, and then are acting like me not responding to that is some victory
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:05 am to dafif
quote:
Anyone do a wellness check on sfp??
SFP wrong again about something legal? Shocked.
Who hires 4cubbies/SFP as their lawyer anyway
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:10 am to DawgCountry
quote:
SFP wrong again
What?
Posted on 10/12/25 at 11:33 am to SlowFlowPro
They create the agency under the executive branch.
In layman's terms its no different than producing a good and giving to the consumer.....it is now the consumer's to do with as they wish, the same way the supreme court ruled it exists at the executive branch's discretion.
Should not be wasting the supreme court's time on this lawfare nonsense.
In layman's terms its no different than producing a good and giving to the consumer.....it is now the consumer's to do with as they wish, the same way the supreme court ruled it exists at the executive branch's discretion.
Should not be wasting the supreme court's time on this lawfare nonsense.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 2:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The question prior to that, I said was irrelevant.
Lulz. Of course.
I get that you didnt want to tell us how those independent agencies are supposed to be governed, if governance wasnt written into the law. Only that Congress COULD write governance one day
Meanwhile, the Supremes will likely rule against you yet again. And you will still say "I told you so"
Heres your chance to tell us so, before they rule
If Congress has failed to include direct governance of an agency, by an elected official, who will the supremes determine is responsible for said governance of that agency?
1) The Exec?
2) They are allowed to operate outside the reach of the voters (aka self-governing)?
3) The Congress?
Posted on 10/12/25 at 2:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I asked for your example of Congress saying, "Well they are independent. We cant intervene"
Well, heres your sign
quote:
The markets expect an independent, central bank,” said GOP South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds, who cautioned against firing Powell. “And if they thought for a minute that he wasn’t independent, it would cast a spell over the forecasts and the integrity of the decisions being made by the bank.”
Popular
Back to top


1






