- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Schumer admitting on TV—using the judiciary to overthrow the United States government
Posted on 3/27/26 at 4:17 pm to Nurbis
Posted on 3/27/26 at 4:17 pm to Nurbis
You think republicans only have installed impartial judges with no agenda behind their choices? You can’t be that fricking clueless. Both sides are trying to stack the courts in their favor. That’s been the case since the beginning.
This post was edited on 3/27/26 at 4:19 pm
1
Posted on 3/27/26 at 4:22 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
You think republicans only have installed impartial judges with no agenda behind their choices? You can’t be that fricking clueless.
Here we have another dishonest prick.
How come when there is a question about what SCOTUS will decide on a case the question swirls around what REPUBLICAN Justices will decide?
because there is ALMOST NEVER a question about what democrat justices will decide
The GOP appoints all kinds of judges.
The democrats ONLY appoint partisan hacks.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 4:28 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Yes lizard.
Zero
Zero
Posted on 3/27/26 at 4:29 pm to RohanGonzales
I guess we’re going to ignore the massive influence the Heritage foundation and Federalist Society has over judicial nominees. Definitely no prebaked agendas there!
The only reason there’s any debate on how recent picks decide is because of the absolute unprecedented lunacy in the policies coming out of Trump’s White House.
The only reason there’s any debate on how recent picks decide is because of the absolute unprecedented lunacy in the policies coming out of Trump’s White House.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 4:31 pm to uziyourillusion
This is not the counterpoint you think it is. Are republican judges partial to conservative perspectives on law? Sure. Do they engage in sweeping, wholesale obstruction of any and all democrat presidential actions?
No. They simply haven’t.
No. They simply haven’t.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 5:22 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
I guess we’re going to ignore the massive influence the Heritage foundation and Federalist Society has over judicial nominees. Definitely no prebaked agendas there!
We have another idiot in the house.
Constitutionalist judges tend to be Conservative and stick to what most reasonable people consider to be Original Intent.
Progressive Judges believe the Constitution is a Living and Breathing document that can change on a whim from them. It should not work that way.
Capiche??? You and Mickey.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 5:28 pm to junkyarddawg3
quote:
But the comments in that X post are very misleading relative to the short video clip within it
Elaborate
Posted on 3/27/26 at 6:10 pm to KCT
Interesting. Do you know where it says that? I know scripture talks about light exposing darkness. Maybe that is what you’re referring?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News