Started By
Message

re: Schiff: There is now 'more than circumstantial evidence' of Trump-Russia collusion

Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:12 pm to
Posted by Dwag4life
Member since Mar 2017
92 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:12 pm to
Schiff is no hack, he's a former LA DA with some big cases under his belt. He measures his words very carefully, any trumpkin with a brain should be worried
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42470 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

And, naturally, you believe him! Of course.


Toddy has bought into so much bull shite over the years it's unreal
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74212 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:13 pm to
What info?
Posted by MoroccoMole
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
337 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

Schiff is no hack, he's a former LA DA with some big cases under his belt. He measures his words very carefully, any trumpkin with a brain should be worried


I see you too are monitoring the Reddit thread. Keep it up baw
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27251 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

And, naturally, you believe him! Of course.


Actually I do. Besides the fact that I love him, he is a very respected journalist. You think he's going to destroy his reputation like Napolitano did?
Posted by Edearl Watson
Parts Unknown
Member since May 2012
6782 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:13 pm to
Meanwhile no one cares that a sitting President wiretaped a Republican candidates phones. You know the real issue.
Posted by MoroccoMole
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
337 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile no one cares that a sitting President wiretaped a Republican candidates phones. You know the real issue.


Wiretapping is a distraction of the rest of this is true. That's small shite compared to the Russian accusations actually being proven.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15964 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Oh yes, and who might those 'US officials' be exactly? Give me specifics or you ain't got nothin'.


Idk but CNN better be telling the truth
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
14115 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:14 pm to
OK, if that narrative makes you feel better, go with it! Meanwhile, reality will move on!
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Give me specifics or you ain't got nothin'.




Give me specifics about Nunes allegations?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115470 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:16 pm to
So...Clapper and Rogers lied? Along with a host of others?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

I find it interesting that this comes out right after it is determined that Trump was under surveillance by the IC.

Except Nunes made it crystal clear that he was not talking about them being under surveillance.
Posted by Edearl Watson
Parts Unknown
Member since May 2012
6782 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:17 pm to
No it's not. Obama disregarded the law, numerous times. This Russia shite is a fabrication of warped liberal minds.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile no one cares that a sitting President wiretaped a Republican candidates phones



Because it never happened.
Posted by TiptonInSC
Aiken, SC
Member since Dec 2012
21217 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

HailHailtoMichigan


Notice how we both asked what info and we get no response.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27251 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

OK, if that narrative makes you feel better, go with it! Meanwhile, reality will move on!


Reality? Let's get this on record here. Do you think Obama tapped Pussy Grabber's phones?
Posted by Edearl Watson
Parts Unknown
Member since May 2012
6782 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:18 pm to
He tapped Merkels along with many others. But not Trumps? Keep telling yourself that. Insert your head even further up your arse. LINK
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 7:21 pm
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39715 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Schiff: There is now 'more than circumstantial evidence' of Trump-Russia collusion by MoroccoMole LINK Today has been a wild ride boys. I don't believe anyone anymore, but something big is going to happen soon.


Agree, Mole. Heard Woodward on O'Reilly, and he all but implied that the Obama Operatives that leaked that stuff had better lawyer up. And O'Reilly then commented that "now we need to find out what Obama knew".
Posted by MoroccoMole
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
337 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:20 pm to
We can both agree that wiretapping is fricked up if it's proven. I would say that the Russians interfering with our election by colluding with Trump is a much bigger story though (if proven).

You can't pick one over the other just because one makes your candidate look bad.
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 7:21 pm
Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:22 pm to
Where is your evidence that Russia colluded with trump?

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram