- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rush on pre-existing ...it's not insurance, it's welfare
Posted on 2/27/20 at 12:00 pm to SlackMaster
Posted on 2/27/20 at 12:00 pm to SlackMaster
quote:Correct. And a collective expense (not an underwriting) to the other members of the group.
In the case of a PEC, there is no risk to evaluate. The condition is a guarantee, by definition. So, requiring coverage of PECs is a windfall to those with PECs.
These tards don't understand you can insure a very unlikely risk with only a small amount of assets. But in the collectivist model you need 100% coverage of the risk x every PEC individual. It takes exponentially more underwriting assets.
1
Posted on 2/27/20 at 12:02 pm to Taxing Authority
But tranny boy is an actuary
Posted on 2/27/20 at 12:22 pm to roadGator
Damn. I started this thread in April. I have fond recollections of those days when I was a younger man.
Posted on 2/27/20 at 1:01 pm to cave canem
quote:
Not a fan of the ACA but there has to be some middle ground somewhere.
Then you should pay for it.
People with pre-existing conditions want their cake and eat it too.
1. They want to force an insurance company to cover them.
2. They also don't want to pay the full cost and expect taxpayers to help pay for it.
You should reach in your pocket and help them , but keep your hand out of others pockets.
Page 11 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News