Started By
Message

re: Rogan and Shapiro agree: get government out of marriage

Posted on 4/5/19 at 8:04 pm to
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
20148 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 8:04 pm to
In some countries, it's not marriage but civil unions. American progressives oppose this approach for some reason.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80926 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

wedding


A wedding is a ceremony, not a legal document.

Some people fly to Vegas and have their wedding officiated by an Elvis impersonator. Some people have a ceremony on the beach. Some go to the courthouse and exchange vows before a justice of the peace. Some have a traditional wedding.

Even a religious wedding can take many forms. You can have a Mass. Or you can visit the priest's office with two of your friends as witnesses. I've even seen one where the exchange of vows replaced the profession of faith at a regular Mass.

But none of that matters to the government. They just care about the document you file at the courthouse.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 8:55 pm to
Ok, cool. The government will never be out of marriage. That’s like hydrogen being out of water.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84017 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

he answer to a question that begins this way is always “no.”
Not always. . .and apparently not in this instance. I just summed up how your point related to mine.

I didn't even editorialize that part



Here is the thread:

You said: Without the social establishment of that right (of religious marriage), there is no civilization and, therefore, no government.

So I asked: What did the Chinese do?

You replied: They did as Confucius (religious Confuscianism) taught and became civilized. That is, among other things, they began marrying.

So I paraphrased for the sake of clarification: so you are saying that the Chinese had no marriages before religion (Confuscianism)?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

so you are saying
No. Always no.

Thanks for the play by play. I was there when it happened.
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
28110 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 9:51 pm to
I completely gave up on rogan, if people knew wnhat a fricking simpleton he was they would probably still watch him.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84017 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

No. Always no.
So you didn't mean what you posted?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 9:55 pm to
Not gonna work
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84017 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 10:00 pm to
What isn't going to work? An exchange of ideas?

I mean. . .alright. . .
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 10:13 pm to
Not the way you’re trying to do it.

Me: Something

You: So you’re saying something else?

Me: No. Something.

You: That’s what I said. Something else.

Me: Sure, pal.
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
28110 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 10:16 pm to
Why do you pseudo-intellectuals froth at the mouth over rogan? that bald headed fricking chimp wont bring you to the promised land, is he the last hope you low confidence fricks have?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84017 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Not the way you’re trying to do it.
Quoting you and trying to get clarification for words that you posted?

How shitty of me
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 10:18 pm to
This is a thread I started under the premise that I disagree with Rogan and think that his opinion on the subject at hand is silly and poorly thought-out.

Great question otherwise.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Quoting you and trying to get clarification for words that you posted?
You’re still doing it.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84017 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

You’re still doing it.

So I can only engage you , If I don't quote what you say, or question what you say?


What?
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
28110 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 10:21 pm to
Attorney here, you are legally out of your depth, stop, if you want to argue the separation of church and state lets do it, do not veil this some fricking joe rogan/ben shapiro threD\
This post was edited on 4/5/19 at 10:22 pm
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Attorney here, you are legally out of your depth, stop,
quote:

You have a penis
quote:

Hold my dick in tor mouth
- Tunasntigers92
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram