- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Roe v. Wade
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:15 am
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:15 am
So I havent been watching much news lately...(purposely).
So please catch me up on why all of a sudden, after 50 years this has been taken up by the court?
In my lifetime, it's been viewed as something that would be difficult to overturn yet here we are 6 mos before midterms and suddenly this is possibility?
Being the untrusting person I am, sounds suspect to me.
Particularly considering some of the stuff the court didnt take up the past 2 years.
Thanks in advance!
So please catch me up on why all of a sudden, after 50 years this has been taken up by the court?
In my lifetime, it's been viewed as something that would be difficult to overturn yet here we are 6 mos before midterms and suddenly this is possibility?
Being the untrusting person I am, sounds suspect to me.
Particularly considering some of the stuff the court didnt take up the past 2 years.
Thanks in advance!
6
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:16 am to geauxdaddy
Because we have more actual biological evidence and clearer arguments to support that abortion is murder and not within the scope of the federal government to enforce
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:16 am to geauxdaddy
It's the libs rally cry for the midterms so that they will forget the complete cluster F of this administration.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:19 am to geauxdaddy
quote:
So please catch me up on why all of a sudden, after 50 years this has been taken up by the court?
It’s not the first time (see Planned Parenthood v. Casey)
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:23 am to geauxdaddy
Between the science, states passing laws banning abortion, and having judges who look at the constitution and not politics RvW has been on life support for years.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:26 am to geauxdaddy
quote:
So please catch me up on why all of a sudden, after 50 years this has been taken up by the court?
The court hears an abortion case like every other term. Roe did not settle the issue and this opinion is acknowledging that and sending it back to the states.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:38 am to geauxdaddy
Roe was an abortion of Constitutional interpretation at its start.
Getting the Federal government out of this is a good first start.
It now moves to the state arena.
50 experiments and resulting experiences will lead the way forward.
Of course, this assumes the lame duck 2022 Congressional Democrats do not try to cobble together a Frankenstein law for Brandon to sign! Expect swampy GOPers to suddenly “evolve” and help it pass. This will ultimately be found unconstitutional as well before the 2024 election.
Getting the Federal government out of this is a good first start.
It now moves to the state arena.
50 experiments and resulting experiences will lead the way forward.
Of course, this assumes the lame duck 2022 Congressional Democrats do not try to cobble together a Frankenstein law for Brandon to sign! Expect swampy GOPers to suddenly “evolve” and help it pass. This will ultimately be found unconstitutional as well before the 2024 election.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 7:50 am to Gaspergou202
quote:
Roe was an abortion of Constitutional interpretation at its start.
Blunt but from what I've understood, accurate.
This post was edited on 5/3/22 at 7:52 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News