Started By
Message

re: Roe v Wade Was a Faulty Decision ------------- According to Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Posted on 7/5/18 at 2:08 pm to
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26029 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

This is something I've thought about a lot lately, as someone who is very pro-choice. How is abortion different from other elective medical procedures (setting aside the issue of ectopic pregnancies and other life-threatening conditions)?

Does a state have the power to ban liposuction? Breast enlargement? Let's go further. Gay conversion therapy? How about even further. Tattoo artistry? Piercings? Where is the line drawn about what should be a protected medical procedure and what isn't?

I'd love to see a Constitutional Amendment protecting the right of people to any elective medical or cosmetic procedure, including abortive services, so long as doctor and patient consent to it. Would stop the UK style "force a baby to die" horror stories that have happened lately, as well as codify the "right to try" experimental medicine and euthanasia.



You feel that getting an abortion is no different than removing a polyp.

We get it.
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7636 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Will republicans finally admit they are authoritarians? I doubt it but it's going to be fun to watch the mental gymnastics


Authoritarian you say? Without the right to life, all other freedoms are meaningless. Freedom to kill another human being should never exist.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 2:16 pm to
quote:


It's not a public vote. It's a legislative vote. If you're confused just Google a video 'schoolhouse rock + I'm just a bill.'



You trust politicians?
Posted by Muthsera
Member since Jun 2017
7319 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

You feel that getting an abortion is no different than removing a polyp.


No, I feel that people should have autonomy over their own bodies and doctors should have autonomy over their own practices.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26029 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 2:18 pm to
The same as removing a polyp and ignoring the potential for life of the child.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45781 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

I feel that people should have autonomy over their own bodies.
Autonomy is limited by how it affects others. You can swing your arms around as much as you want until you hit someone else with them. Abortion is hitting the unborn in the face and the autonomy should end where their lives begin.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116734 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

You trust politicians?


Politicians know they can be voted out of office. Judges know they cannot. Are you beginning to understand?
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 3:31 pm to
I like the lead actress in the movie
Posted by Muthsera
Member since Jun 2017
7319 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

autonomy should end where their lives begin.


Where does their life begin? Fertilization? Implantation? Heartbeat? Brain activity? Viability? Birth?

What if they have a heartbeat but no brain develops?

What if they have a brain and cardiovascular system, but no arms, legs, or genitals?

What if the mother has extreme high blood pressure and a > 50% chance of dying from pre-eclampsia if she carries a baby to term?

It's obtuse to claim the moral high ground of "abortion = killing babies" in all circumstances and that's that.

In such a personal matter, the only defensible position is to let the parents and their physician decide - any government intervention is statist, authoritarian bullshite.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27251 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 6:49 pm to
She has stated many times that the Rowe decision came too early. Whether we like it or not, societal acceptance and public attitudes DO influence some of the SCOTUS rulings
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 7/5/18 at 9:24 pm to
quote:


Politicians know they can be voted out of office. Judges know they cannot. Are you beginning to understand?


well you're wrong about the judge thing but that's cool
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45781 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Where does their life begin? Fertilization? Implantation? Heartbeat? Brain activity? Viability? Birth?
Conception/fertilization. At that point, the unborn have their own DNA and all the genetic material needed to mature into a fully formed person.

quote:

What if they have a heartbeat but no brain develops?
They will die naturally in that case.

quote:

What if they have a brain and cardiovascular system, but no arms, legs, or genitals?
They will most likely live and should be carried to term.

quote:

What if the mother has extreme high blood pressure and a > 50% chance of dying from pre-eclampsia if she carries a baby to term?
Preeclampsia isn't a death sentence. There are many options doctors have to treat it in their patients and if there is a severe case that cannot be treated without the loss of the child, it should be left to the mother and the doctor to decide what course of action is best. I support the allowance for abortion only in the case of likely death of the mother if it isn't performed.

quote:

It's obtuse to claim the moral high ground of "abortion = killing babies" in all circumstances and that's that.
Did I say that abortion is never an option? I support allowance for abortion when the life of the mother is in danger. All other scenarios are off limits in my opinion.

quote:

In such a personal matter, the only defensible position is to let the parents and their physician decide - any government intervention is statist, authoritarian bull shite.
When you're talking about people's lives, it moves beyond a "personal matter". What if my neighbor wanted to kill his toddler because he lost his job and was too stressed to take care of his family? Is that a personal matter or a matter for the state? I think abortion is a matter for the state, not because I want the state involved in every aspect of our lives but because the state should be involved in cases of homicide.
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 9:45 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram