- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma…
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:37 pm to somethingdifferent
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:37 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
So when you admitted there are problems with the peer review process
Again, you don't know what the problems are despite how many times you write out these words.
quote:
Again, get this, RFK jr is actually fighting FOR YOU against the political establishment who lied to you, stole your tax dollars for personal gain and nearly crashed our economy just for the sake of power. But, he's stupid
He isn't.
quote:
Again, you're not too bright
Oh no! Little man is mad again!
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:38 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:SIXTY TWO GENDERS UNITE!!!!
Again, his science is from politics. Not from science
quote:Keep trying to derail the thread genius. Maybe it will work one day
He thinks admitting "of course all humans have bias" is some sort of major concession
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:38 pm to David_DJS
quote:
What in the actual frick is this?
What is the issue, my response, or your idiotic leading question? Again, you can believe what you like, but I know for a fact that it won't be reflective of anything resembling what actually happened. You don't have the ability to make that determination, unfortunately. We both know that. Run along.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:40 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Let’s put COVID aside for a second. Give me a real-world example of this, from big pharma ‘cooking up’ the research to it being implemented at the ground level
Tobacco scandal???
Wow
Aside from that obvious example of how you're wrong once again, it could be said that ANY TIME a journal publishes something that was produced by unscrupulous means and is used by a doctor for healthcare, that would be an example. So you could just use ANY example of retracted or known false papers to answer your own stupid question
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:41 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:I'm talking to you
I'm not talking to you
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:42 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Tobacco scandal???
Dear god, you have nothing else.
quote:
Aside from that obvious example of how you're wrong once again, it could be said that ANY TIME a journal publishes something that was produced by unscrupulous means and is used by a doctor for healthcare, that would be an example. So you could just use ANY example of retracted or known false papers to answer your own stupid question
No, there are plenty of guidelines we use all the time. Give me a specific example of this process from the research that was 'cooked up' to those guidelines being actually implemented in the real-world.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:44 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
What is the issue, my response, or your idiotic leading question?
I asked if you disagree with the notion that the CDC purposefully lied about some things during Covid. It was just a question.
quote:
Again, you can believe what you like, but I know for a fact that it won't be reflective of anything resembling what actually happened. You don't have the ability to make that determination, unfortunately. We both know that. Run along
This is why I think you may have lost your mind. You don't know what I think. I don't know what you think. That's why I asked a question. Not sure why it has brought this reaction out of you.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:46 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:Yeah, those doctors who are still out there saying their practice was affected by the establishment narrative are just lying. They're intentionally trying to torpedo their own career.
I am sure that is what they tell you, given the persistence of ideation you seem to have. I say shite all the time to keep the encounter moving.
You are dull
quote:Is he fighting the establishment, yes or no. The answer is yes. He's fighting for you genius
If that is what you want to believe, have at it
quote:That's because you have a form of TDS and aren't emotionally mature enough to admit it. It's astonishing that you go on and on about MUH SCIENCE but can't see that this statement right here is the antithesis of science. It's plainly and blatantly the genetic fallacy. Do you even know what that is? Why don't you type that into AI and find out
I view it differently and will continue to undermine anything he says or does
quote:So the people in these threads don't care about the damage done that caused an erosion of trust and how it happened? Stealing YOUR tax dollars to work against YOU?
They care about their health
quote:Yet you know he's incredibly popular right now with conservatives. Why is that?
RFK was polling terribly by himself
quote:
so his reelection in the face of Dems bungling their candidate wasn’t that surprising
You seriously, seriously have emotional problems.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:47 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I asked if you disagree with the notion that the CDC purposefully lied about some things during Covid. It was just a question.
Re-read that question, slowly, and maybe see why I would take issue with it. Read all the words. Don't be dishonest.
quote:
This is why I think you may have lost your mind. You don't know what I think. I don't know what you think. That's why I asked a question. Not sure why it has brought this reaction out of you.
Again, you offered a leading question and are trying to back away from it. And I am saying simply that my rendition of events will not match the one you want. That's also okay. If you want to believe that everything was 'purposeful' (which was used in your original question, I believe), there isn't any argument I can make that can disabuse you of that notion in particular.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:48 pm to David_DJS
Some of the docs in this thread are so soft. They cannot fathom how much the medical profession has gone from respected to mocked. It’s a dramatic blow to their egos. They should hear the lawyer jokes out there. Thank god the went into medicine. Their fragile egos couldn’t handle those.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:50 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
dramatic blow to their egos.
Nothing a little triple billing wont solve.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:51 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, you offered a leading question and are trying to back away from it.
I'm not backing away from it. I've asked it twice and will ask it again.
Do you think the CDC purposefully lied about some things during the pandemic?
You are the one backing away from it and I'm not sure why.
quote:
If you want to believe that everything was 'purposeful' (which was used in your original question, I believe)
Why are you twisted up about "purposeful" - all that means is they didn't lie by accident or using information later found to be inaccurate. I'll rephrase the question so it doesn't upset you:
Do you think the CDC outright/knowingly lied about some things during the pandemic?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:52 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Do you think the CDC outright/knowingly lied about some things during the pandemic?
Good luck.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:54 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:No, you admitted there are actually problems with the process like RFK jr says. It's ok. You don't have to literally admit it but adults know that's what happened. Maybe when you get emotionally more mature, you can face up to it
No, I am treating the toddler like a toddler.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:54 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Yeah, those doctors who are still out there saying their practice was affected by the establishment narrative are just lying. They're intentionally trying to torpedo their own career.
The grifters definitely torpedoed their career.
quote:
Is he fighting the establishment, yes or no. The answer is yes. He's fighting for you genius
Lol, no.
quote:
It's astonishing that you go on and on about MUH SCIENCE but can't see that this statement right here is the antithesis of science. It's plainly and blatantly the genetic fallacy
He's operating in the political realm. He has produced nothing of scientific value. I'm looking at the entire oeuvre to make that determination.
quote:
So the people in these threads don't care about the damage done that caused an erosion of trust and how it happened? Stealing YOUR tax dollars to work against YOU?
Well, I don't give a shite about them. I care about the health of my patients. Do you know how often a patient has brought up COVID like you psychos bring it up?
quote:
Oh yes, the old "he didn't win, we lost."
What? The Dems did bungle their candidates. Trump was likely to win against most Dem candidates, regardless.
quote:
You seriously, seriously have emotional problems.
Lol you dumbass
Posted on 9/8/25 at 6:01 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:So when experts say that reviewers do have a part in the process, they're lying? You just can't admit you're wrong, can you?
You are so intensely stupid it is amazing you can breath
quote:
If that is what you want to believe
But I totally get that your delusion of graduer would make you side with the authoritarian, not the person fighting for liberty
quote:Says the person who thinks they can read minds
Oh no, the little toddler doesn't like it when I tell him no!
Do you realize that you haven't truly, honestly answered a single question I've asked.
Are there problems with the peer review process, yes or no? If you say yes, you agree with RFK jr and he's not totally worthless. If you say no, you're contradicting facts. Good luck with that conundrum
Posted on 9/8/25 at 6:02 pm to David_DJS
Did they lie out of maliciousness, not in my view. Were they mistaken about several things, yes. Did they handle the communication aspect of the pandemic well, no. It's okay for public health officials to be mistaken about a novel virus as they learn more about it. Obviously, the proclamations they made that gave to impression of absolute certainty were massive mistakes. Like I said very early in the pandemic when I was in on a call with some people involved in the messaging, I don't think they understood social media and how it operated or operates. Who could fathom the degree to which certain people really took to heart certain statements as though they were intractable truths? Again, the people who seem to take it really seriously seem to congregate on reactionary message boards.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 6:05 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
No, you admitted there are actually problems with the process like RFK jr says
We don't think they are the same problems or issues. That isn't the same thing. I have no idea how you think this is some sort of meaningful point. There are problems with literally every aspect of medicine to varying degrees. I can guarantee you that RFK and I would not find very much that we agree on about what exactly those problems are, or the nature of those problems, etc.. I'm not sure why you are having a hard time understanding this. I would not point to the bias of the referee in a review as being particularly problematic, nor one that would require RFK's insight.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 6:05 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, you don't know what the problems are despite how many times you write out these words
quote:Ok SFP
He isn't
Did the govt use tax dollars to collude with big tech/legacy media/big pharma to control the narratives of covid? The answer is yes. Now you're denying well established facts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 6:07 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Did the govt use tax dollars to collude with big tech/legacy media/big pharma to control the narratives of covid? The answer is yes.
Obviously they didn't do it well enough.
Popular
Back to top


1



