- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Republicans should purge Collins, Flake, Murkowski
Posted on 9/24/18 at 12:15 pm to bamafan1001
Posted on 9/24/18 at 12:15 pm to bamafan1001
Assuming they pick up enough Senate seats, you can expect some adverse consequences for the wimmens (Flake is gone).
0
Posted on 9/24/18 at 12:40 pm to bamafan1001
quote:
They will side with Dems and then get their asses voted out
Collins and Murkowski get 4 more years.
Voting them out on the basis of kav is not happening.
Why? Because a very conservative woman will be nominated. Kav will be no more than Bork. Like garland. A political nominee that was rejected by the senate.
4 years of USA history will erase any sign of this nominee
Posted on 9/24/18 at 1:20 pm to CelticDog
Refusing to comfirm Kav will set in stone the precedent that to derail any conservative, just throw out a few accusers. No proof or actual truth is needed, just an accusation.
Posted on 9/24/18 at 1:51 pm to bamafan1001
quote:
Refusing to comfirm Kav will set in stone the precedent that to derail any conservative, just throw out a few accusers. No proof or actual truth is needed, just an accusation.
Garland.
1 year. No excuse except, its an election year.
Posted on 9/24/18 at 1:53 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Garland. 1 year. No excuse except, its an election year.
They wouldn’t have confirmed him. He didn’t have the votes. Why does it matter that he didn’t get his committee hearing? It would have been a waste of time.
He wouldn’t have been confirmed by a Republican Senate. The fake outrage about him not getting a confirmation hearing is just that, fake. Or shortsighted.
Of course, all of this goes with the understanding that Merrick Garland’s nomination is not relevant in any way to this process...... unless you are admitting that current events are nothing more than a political tit for tat?
This post was edited on 9/24/18 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 9/24/18 at 1:56 pm to CelticDog
quote:
CelticDog
You are a fricking idiot Otto
Posted on 9/24/18 at 1:59 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
The fake outrage about him not getting a confirmation hearing is just that,
The funny thing is, nobody even bothered to muster much of any of that at the time, much less anything that would be seen as genuine outrage.
Why anyone continues giving this Muh Garland canard any credence at all is beyond me.
Posted on 9/24/18 at 2:15 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
funny thing is, nobody even bothered to muster much of any of that at the time, much less anything that would be seen as genuineoutrage.
You are living in isolation.
Stop listening to rush and fox.
Read more widely.
There are 4 or 5 posters on TD left of center.
Two were banned during garland.
During garland, I think rex was banned. Col toddy was banned and never returned. Maybe toddy is col toddy.
Posted on 9/24/18 at 2:16 pm to CelticDog
quote:
There are 4 or 5 posters on TD left of center.
quote:He is the bottom boi requested a name change.
Maybe toddy is col toddy.
Posted on 9/24/18 at 2:21 pm to bamafan1001
quote:Is not running for re-election.
Flake,
quote:She is the closest thing to a Republican in Maine.
Collins
quote:Needs to be primaried hard in her next election.
Murkowski
Posted on 9/24/18 at 2:25 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:
Yet some Repubs wanna purge the very people that give . . . Repubs power.
I believe these people are called NeverTrumpers or RINOs. Or Jeff Flake
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News