- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Repeat after me, NO COLLUSION & NO OBSTRUCTION!
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:02 pm to texridder
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:02 pm to texridder
quote:
What does the presumption of innocence have to do with whether Trump actually committed obstruction?
Ah. So you want to just declare him guilty and ignore criminal procedure. How convenient. Carry on. Hint: hard to get a criminal conviction if you ignore criminal procedures. ETA: before you make your next mistake...let me remind you Congress cannot find trump criminally guilty of obstruction either. They don’t have that power. Impeachment is not a criminal procedure. Obstruction is part of the criminal code. Just trying to protect you from yourself.
This post was edited on 5/30/19 at 7:04 pm
1
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:A weasel out answer just like always.
So you want to just declare him guilty and ignore criminal procedure. How convenient. Carry on. Hint: hard to get a criminal conviction if you ignore criminal procedures.
Try this again. Answer this question. And don't give me a bunch of bullshite about criminal procedure.
What does the presumption of innocence have to do with whether Trump actually committed obstruction?
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:07 pm to texridder
quote:
whether Trump actually committed obstruction?
Let's see your evidence he committed obstruction first.
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:15 pm to texridder
quote:
What does the presumption of innocence have to do with whether Trump actually committed obstruction?
Obstruction of Justice is a crime codified in the US code. Those accused of crimes in the United States enjoy a presumption of innocence. In order to overcome that presumption, a United States attorney must prove to a finder of fact beyond a reasonable doubt that the elements of the crime were met. And you don’t know why the presumption of innocence is important in determining wether the crime of obstruction was committed? Good lord.
If you want to pretend you are finding him guilty of something not codified in the criminal code, feel free. But that isn’t obstruction. Your question only amplifies your ignorance of basics. Anyone with a modicum of understanding would not need this simple concept explained.
This post was edited on 5/30/19 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:15 pm to awestruck
quote:Actually he has an enormous inferiority complex. That's one reason why he has his name in caps and why he comes on here desperately trying to make people think he has something other than a very average intellect.
BBONDS25 . . . . . . . as if choosing a name in cap's would somehow make you seem smarter.
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:19 pm to texridder
Holy shite. You guys are analyzing MY username being in caps and accuse me of having an inferiority complex? tell you what, if I did it would take one short conversation with you to make me feel like the smartest man alive. Thanks for helping me fight my complex. 
tell you what, if I did it would take one short conversation with you to make me feel like the smartest man alive. Thanks for helping me fight my complex. This post was edited on 5/30/19 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:19 pm to Geauxst Writer
quote:
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
8h
This post was edited on 5/30/19 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:21 pm to BBONDS25
quote:It's a burden of proof legal presumption, dumbass. It doesn't have anything to do with whether that person actually committed the crime or not.
Those accused of crimes in the United States enjoy a presumption of innocence.
You're a clown.
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:22 pm to texridder
quote:
It's a burden of proof legal presumption, dumbass. It doesn't have anything to do with whether that person actually committed the crime or not.
So you want to just call him guilty without having to meet the burden. Presume his guilt, if you will. We know. Fascists gonna fascist.
This post was edited on 5/30/19 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:24 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Tell me jackass, why did you put your username in all caps?
You guys are analyzing MY username being in caps and accuse me of having an inferiority complex?
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:25 pm to texridder
I have no clue. It was a decade ago. And I like Barry bonds. It is so weird you analyze that. It’s kind of creepy. I mean really creepy. You are the same poster obsessed with my businesses and past professions too. Please do not respond to me anymore. I will stop posting to you. This has crossed the line from entertainment to legitimately weird.
This post was edited on 5/30/19 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:31 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
It's a burden of proof legal presumption, dumbass. It doesn't have anything to do with whether that person actually committed the crime or not.
quote:
So you want to just call him guilty without having to meet the burden. Presume his guilt, if you will.
Dumbass, just answer the question. What does the legal presumption of presumption of innocence have to do with whether Trump actually committed obstruction or not?
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:36 pm to Seldom Seen
I am going to be laughing so hard at stupid posts like yours when the country sets things right and boots that lying, corrupt POS out of office.
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:43 pm to BBONDS25
quote:I didn't bring it up. Another poster brought up your all caps username weirdness.
It is so weird you analyze that.
quote:I was curiously because you claim to have all this vast work experience when you have only been out of law school for about 10 years. Just more of your bullshite.
You are the same poster obsessed with my businesses and past professions too.
quote:You tired of getting your bullshite pushed back in your face?
Please do not respond to me anymore. I will stop posting to you.
Before you go, answer the question about presumption of innocence so I can get to demonstrate your ignorance one more time.
Posted on 5/30/19 at 7:51 pm to Seldom Seen
NO COLLUSION & NO OBSTRUCTION!
Both statements are true!
Both statements are true!
Posted on 5/30/19 at 8:55 pm to texridder
quote:Holee isht.
What does the presumption of innocence have to do with this?
I started to laugh at this.
Then I realized how scary it is. Do you really want to live under a regime that can simply presume people are guilty of criminal offenses because they are not political opponents? Because thst would seem to be your position.
That is “literally Hitler” territory.
Posted on 5/30/19 at 8:57 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Anything to avoid he issue at hand.
You guys are analyzing MY username being in caps and accuse me of having an inferiority complex?
Posted on 5/30/19 at 9:08 pm to mettematt9
quote:
possible obstruction.
Possible? You don’t prosecute possible. Again, if the guy had ample evidence he would have recommended charges just as SC Starr did with Clinton.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News