Remember those undercover videos that showed planned parenthood execs discuss sick stuff?

There is a special place in hell for those people

Demonic

Yes.

Hard to read this and no be moved to deep sadness

Damn!
I was hoping to get a lucky baby’s foot key ring for my birthday too.

Sarcasm [on]

Knew that a long time ago. People truly have no idea how evil these paragons of ",women's health" are.

fricking heinous evil shite.

Well there was still no evidence of editing

I typically avoid your posts but had to respond to this one...

....quote:

quote:

---

quote: In its ruling tonight, the Fifth Circuit not only affirmed the state’s right to terminate its agreement with Planned Parenthood affiliates, but also confirmed that the videos were undoctored. The court noted that an independent forensic firm’s review of the undercover footage found “that the video was authentic and not deceptively edited.”
Not true. How so, says you?
quote: confirmed that the videos were undoctored. quote: The court noted that an independent forensic firm’s review
The court did not confirm any of that. The court only noted that the Office of Inspector General had submitted a report (NOT AN INDEPENDENT REPORT)( See below about a forensic team)and that Planned Parent had not contested the finding.
The sum total of the court's discussion of the video is below:
quote: In fact, the record reflects that OIG had submitted a report from a forensic firm concluding that the video was authentic and not deceptively edited. And the plaintiffs did not identify any particular omission or addition in the video footage.Hard to deny what they have proof of.
The court made no finding on whether the video was or was not doctored. National Review's claim that was the case is simply false. Of course this won't keep many of the baws on here from parroting the falsehoods in the NR article. That's just the way they roll.

---

So, the 5th Circuit in it's ruling said the videos (I have't watched them) were undoctored; and an independent forensic firm found the video was authentic, but its all false according to you? I'm not sure what your point was with this but I think you should have aborted before you started.

quote:

---

So, the 5th Circuit in it's ruling said the videos (I have't watched them) were undoctored; and an independent forensic firm found the video was authentic, but its all false according to you? I'm not sure what your point was with this but I think you should have aborted before you started.

---

The reason I made that post is because I know that so many people (like you) on here can't read something and make an independent critical analysis of what they have read.

This is exactly what the Fifth Circuit said (which I posted, but you obviously didn't comprehend):

quote:

---

In fact, the record reflects that OIG had submitted a report from a forensic firm concluding that the video was authentic and not deceptively edited. And the plaintiffs did not identify any particular omission or addition in the video footage.

---

The Fifth Circuit never said the videos were undoctored. It said that the OIG had presented a report that said that the video had not been deceptively edited and that PP had not produced evidence to point to a particular part of the video that had been edited.

The Fifth Circuit was responding to the lower court's finding that the video had been edited based only on the testimony of the PP witnesses saying it was edited (and which the Fifth Circuit was in the process of reversing in this opinion).