- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rejoice! Another Process Crime for Mueller
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:40 pm to SCLibertarian
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:40 pm to SCLibertarian
You need to look up the definition of "perjury".
A perjury conviction requires a DELIBERATE and MATERIAL misstatement of fact, not some inconsequential error.
A perjury conviction requires a DELIBERATE and MATERIAL misstatement of fact, not some inconsequential error.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:42 pm to Rex
quote:
Rex
MAGA all in yo face!!!!!!!!
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:48 pm to Rex
quote:Great let them lawyer up and go to court. Mueller has shown he is an ace in the courtroom.
A perjury conviction requires a DELIBERATE and MATERIAL misstatement of fact, not some inconsequential error.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:48 pm to Rex
Corsi isn't being charged with perjury, he's being charged with lying to the FBI. This is a different section of Title 18, with different elements altogether. Perjury cannot be proven if one believes their statement to be true, because it isn't fraudulent. Lying to the FBI requires a statement only be false or fictitious for a charge to be sustained.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:52 pm to Decatur
quote:
Most people that have given testimony to the FBI, SCO or grand jury don't seem to have this problem
Stat? Link ...?
Is most > 4 in 60?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:00 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
Lying to the FBI requires a statement only be false or fictitious for a charge to be sustained.
I see you're talking out your arse.
Here's the relevant statute:
18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally
US Code
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
In other words, just as I said.
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:06 pm to Rex
My client was telling the truth unless you have evidence that proves otherwise please suck on my balls.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:22 pm to Rex
Here's an example for your idiot arse:
-John says he went to the store at 8:00 pm.
-Jane says John went to the store at 9:30 pm.
John believes his time and Jane believes her time. If the statement is material to an investigation, this is sufficient to sustain a charge of lying to the FBI. John made the statement knowingly and wilfully because he believed it to be true, but once again, his belief in its truth or falsity is irrelevant. The Feds have a contradictory statement from another person.
-John says he went to the store at 8:00 pm.
-Jane says John went to the store at 9:30 pm.
John believes his time and Jane believes her time. If the statement is material to an investigation, this is sufficient to sustain a charge of lying to the FBI. John made the statement knowingly and wilfully because he believed it to be true, but once again, his belief in its truth or falsity is irrelevant. The Feds have a contradictory statement from another person.
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:26 pm to SCLibertarian
Oh, I get it... you're just stupid.
My mistake to provide you with actual words you couldn't understand.
My mistake to provide you with actual words you couldn't understand.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:26 pm to Rex
What made the dogboy bring his pussy arse back to the board?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:28 pm to SCLibertarian
Don't forget Jane has already been charged with making false statements.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:29 pm to Rex
You guys are so funny, you practically felt Manafort drove a Mig to work and how did that trial turn out for you? Still waiting for him to flip on Trump?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:52 pm to ninthward
Manafort is in prison. Flip? Who knows if he has or not... YOU certainly don't.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:53 pm to Rex
Rexcatur weighs in, where you been lately bitch?
Posted on 11/13/18 at 3:00 am to NIH
quote:
You guys are going to take down the info Wars staff!
Meuller is a republican, appointed by a republican in a republican administration under the supervision of a republican Trump appointee..
Posted on 11/13/18 at 3:25 am to Rex
quote:
A perjury conviction requires a DELIBERATE and MATERIAL misstatement of fact, not some inconsequential error.
Tell that to Papa-D who was accused of lying about a date and time.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 10:44 am to Rex
When you can't win the argument,
Reach for the ad hominem.
Never change Rex.
Reach for the ad hominem.
Never change Rex.
Popular
Back to top

5








