- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reality check re: AZ election numbers VS. the primary numbers
Posted on 5/31/21 at 8:47 pm to Great Plains Drifter
Posted on 5/31/21 at 8:47 pm to Great Plains Drifter
1. I am certainly aware that Heritage is considered right wing. Please Google "tongue in cheek." The idiom tongue-in-cheek refers to a humorous or sarcastic statement expressed in a mock serious manner;
2. Your reference at Heritage.org is to a "Commentary"/Opinion piece. Mine is to their data/statistical presentation. 1328 cases of voter fraud in 30 years from all State and Federal elections is the very definition of nothingburger.
2. Your reference at Heritage.org is to a "Commentary"/Opinion piece. Mine is to their data/statistical presentation. 1328 cases of voter fraud in 30 years from all State and Federal elections is the very definition of nothingburger.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:31 pm to thingshavechanged
I would assume even an opinion piece from the very organization itself pertaining to their own data would be of interest to most people of a curious nature. I regret making that assumption about yourself.
Next time you attempt to be quippy and sarcastic with a set up, a commonly used method of “quotations” will let your audience know how witty and sarcastic you’re being. (There’s a little “common sense” tip for you.) Otherwise, you’re assuming your audience should know your m.o. which is sort of ridiculous for an anonymous message board.
No one has really disputed that 81 million votes “were counted” for Biden. What many do question are the validity of all those 81 million votes, especially since a significant number were included in massive dumps in the wee hours of the morning under not too many watchful eyes.
Requests to look further via audits (not recounts because 81 million will likely be recounted as ....81 million) are being met with a lot of anger, delay and pushback, lawyers, etc. Suspicions are only further fueled in large part due to the increasingly suspicious behavior of those in charge in the questioned states.
Again, just under 50% of the population is said to have participated by mail-in or absentee ballot. That’s an unprecedented number. Even the “far left wing think tank” (I can be a wise aarse too) Heritage Foundation has opined plenty of fundamental valid questions and concerns warrant further analysis if for no other reason than to ensure the integrity of our system in the eyes of all now and going forward.
So your numbers are interesting but at the end of the day the story behind the numbers is what most interests me and others. You take at face value the vast majority of those 81 million as legit and we haven’t made that leap of faith.
This thing could be opened up and ultimately settled forever. It’s interesting how challenging of an effort that is proving to be against the take our word for it folks.
Next time you attempt to be quippy and sarcastic with a set up, a commonly used method of “quotations” will let your audience know how witty and sarcastic you’re being. (There’s a little “common sense” tip for you.) Otherwise, you’re assuming your audience should know your m.o. which is sort of ridiculous for an anonymous message board.
No one has really disputed that 81 million votes “were counted” for Biden. What many do question are the validity of all those 81 million votes, especially since a significant number were included in massive dumps in the wee hours of the morning under not too many watchful eyes.
Requests to look further via audits (not recounts because 81 million will likely be recounted as ....81 million) are being met with a lot of anger, delay and pushback, lawyers, etc. Suspicions are only further fueled in large part due to the increasingly suspicious behavior of those in charge in the questioned states.
Again, just under 50% of the population is said to have participated by mail-in or absentee ballot. That’s an unprecedented number. Even the “far left wing think tank” (I can be a wise aarse too) Heritage Foundation has opined plenty of fundamental valid questions and concerns warrant further analysis if for no other reason than to ensure the integrity of our system in the eyes of all now and going forward.
So your numbers are interesting but at the end of the day the story behind the numbers is what most interests me and others. You take at face value the vast majority of those 81 million as legit and we haven’t made that leap of faith.
This thing could be opened up and ultimately settled forever. It’s interesting how challenging of an effort that is proving to be against the take our word for it folks.
Posted on 6/4/21 at 6:26 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
They finally started to in CA with the ballot harvesting and they won back some seats that had been taken by the filth with that tactic.
Yet every signature had to be verified because it was that important.
Popular
Back to top

1




