Started By
Message

re: Rand Paul demands Dems return money raised by "sexual predator" Bill Clinton

Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:11 am to
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Rand Paul demands Dems return money raised by "sexual predator" Bill Clinton

quote:
I've got an old image of Bill and Hillary playing volleyball back in college, but I can't copy/paste it.

This?




OT 3 WNHI
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

So, should Hillary be "held responsible" for Bill's behavior? Hillary enables Bill. She is to Bill exactly what Dottie Sandusky was to Jerry Sandusky. She is certainly responsible for that.

NC, let's be honest. Do you really equate what Bill Clinton did with various women, all of whom were adults and at least some of them consenting, with what Jerry Sandusky did with little boys? I think Paul's attacks on Clinton are fair game, but if he tried to equate him with Sandusky, he would be laughed off the stage and likely destroy his Presidential viability.
This post was edited on 2/8/14 at 10:22 am
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
30885 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:25 am to
quote:

NC, let's be honest. Do you really equate what Bill Clinton did with various women, all of whom were adults and at least some of them consenting, with what Jerry Sandusky did with little boys? I think Paul's attacks on Clinton are fair game, but if he tried to equate him with Sandusky, he would be laughed off the stage and likely destroy his Presidential viability.

Are wou asking if sexually abusing women isn't as bad as sexually abusing young boys?
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Are wou asking if sexually abusing women isn't as bad as sexually abusing young boys?

I worded my question exactly the way I wanted to word it, and a simple yes or no answer will do. Do you have reading comprehension problems?
This post was edited on 2/8/14 at 10:29 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135419 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Do you really equate what Bill Clinton did with various women, all of whom were adults and at least some of them consenting, with what Jerry Sandusky did with little boys?
Is there confusion about the term "enabling"?
This post was edited on 2/8/14 at 11:21 am
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Is their confusion about the term "enabling"?

Is that a yes or a no?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135419 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:35 am to
quote:

I think Paul's attacks on Clinton are fair game, but if he tried to equate him with Sandusky, he would be laughed off the stage and likely destroy his Presidential viability.
Paul has stayed away from attacking Hillary on this.
Dowd and others have been slightly less shy in pointing out her actual complicity though.

Ultimately Paul's tact is about neutralizing the War on Women. Period.

He is managing that fairly deftly, so far.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135419 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Is that a yes or a no?
The equation referenced enabling abuse, not pedophilic sodomy vs assault and rape.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
30885 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Is that a yes or a no?

Sexual abuse is sexual abuse. No matter how many times or the gender of the abused. Enabling is enabling. So yes. I can't believe you asked the question.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:43 am to
quote:

The equation referenced enabling abuse, not pedophilic sodomy vs assault and rape.

Even that's a nonsensical comparison because Hillary never enabled Bill, to chase women, he just did it when she wasn't around. There's no evidence that Bill ever chased women in Hillary's presence. On the other hand, Jerry Sandusky's wife was in the house when her husband brought little boys home and sat idly by while he molested them.

Also, your rape allegations is nothing but right-wing propaganda. Sexual harassment =/= rape.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100290 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:46 am to
You could make an argument that Hillary enables it by not leaving Bill. She knows he does it yet stays with him for political purposes.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:51 am to
quote:

.Paul has stayed away from attacking Hillary on this.

That's a smart move on his part.

quote:

Ultimately Paul's tact is about neutralizing the War on Women. Period.

I don't know if you watched the Hardball video that I linked earlier, but they believe his motive is to make Bill radioactive, so that Hillary can't use him as a surrogate the way Obama did in 2012. They also think it's a way of building up his street-cred with the Republican base without driving up his negatives.

quote:

He is managing that fairly deftly, so far.

He's definitely not shooting from the hip, a la Cruz, and I'm guessing that his advisors poll-tested this tactic before he decided to use it.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135419 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:52 am to
quote:

There's no evidence that Bill ever chased women in Hillary's presence.
Bill Clinton Bagged Liz Hurley—While Hillary Was In Next Room!
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135419 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Bill Clinton Bagged Liz Hurley—While Hillary Was In Next Room!
Which of course requires this repost . . .



Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135419 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:56 am to
quote:

your rape allegations is nothing but right-wing propaganda
You probably should view the Broaddrick links posted earlier in the thread.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31648 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

You probably should view the Broaddrick links posted earlier in the thread.


Starting with the affidavit where she denied everything
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

You could make an argument that Hillary enables it by not leaving Bill. She knows he does it yet stays with him for political purposes.

I can see that. I remember a lot women being very disappointed in her for not leaving him, especially after she declared that she was a "Tammy-Wynette-stand-by-your-man" type of woman.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135419 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Starting with the affidavit where she denied everything

Actually, as you know, she did not "deny everything."
She denied Clinton made multiple sexual advanceS.
She did not deny he made one.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31648 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:34 pm to
She could have phrased it any way she wanted.

But hey, maybe if you keep repeating it to yourself you can make it all true.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31648 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Bill Clinton Bagged Liz Hurley—While Hillary Was In Next Room


quote:

But hey, maybe if you keep repeating it to yourself you can make it all true.

Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram