Started By
Message

re: Rand Paul and foreign policy

Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:09 pm to
Posted by lsutigerfan1976
Slidell, LA
Member since Nov 2009
2358 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

More often than not, we come to regret it when we do try to control events, so a non-interventionist foreign policy is the way to go IMO.


This is what i am in favor. And yet, if we get a pres that does this. He is viewed by many as soft. You can't make everyone happy i guess.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

I agree with Jennifer Rubin that the Paul family is just awful when it comes to foreign policy

I respectfully disagree. IMO, the next time Rubin says something sensible of foreign policy will be the first. This op-ed by the former Washington Post Ombudsman tells you all you need to know about her:

quote:

Jennifer Rubin. Have Fred Hiatt, your editorial page editor—who I like, admire, and respect—fire opinion blogger Jennifer Rubin. Not because she’s conservative, but because she’s just plain bad. She doesn’t travel within a hundred miles of Post standards. She parrots and peddles every silly right-wing theory to come down the pike in transparent attempts to get Web hits. Her analysis of the conservative movement, which is a worthwhile and important beat that the Post should treat more seriously on its national pages, is shallow and predictable. Her columns, at best, are political pornography; they get a quick but sure rise out of the right, but you feel bad afterward.

And she is often wrong, and rarely acknowledges it. She was oh-so-wrong about Mitt Romney, week after week writing embarrassing flattery about his 2012 campaign, calling almost every move he made brilliant, and guaranteeing that he would trounce Barack Obama. When he lost, the next day she savaged him and his campaign with treachery, saying he was the worst candidate with the worst staff, ever. She was wrong about the Norway shootings being acts of al-Qaida. She was wrong about Chuck Hagel being an anti-Semite. And does she apologize? Nope.

Rubin was the No. 1 source of complaint mail about any single Post staffer while I was ombudsman, and I’m leaving out the organized email campaigns against her by leftie groups like Media Matters. Thinking conservatives didn’t like her, thinking moderates didn’t like her, government workers who knew her arguments to be unfair didn’t like her. Dump her like a dull tome on the Amazon Bargain Books page.

LINK
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32659 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

Hopefully, most of them.


Why not just withdraw from NATO then?

That's what this is about to the new right's foreign policy...withdrawal from the world.

quote:

How exactly would you propose US forces in Western Europe deter Putin from attacking non-US assets in countries adjacent to Russia?


Not much different than what we've been doing the last half century. It may not be perfect but it surely beats an expansionist Russia.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

How many US military installations in Europe, Balkans, etc would Rand Paul cut if he is elected President?

How would cutting our forces over there act as a deterrent to someone like Putin?

Eventually, all of them should be cut. It's not our responsibility to be Europe's bodyguard.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:13 pm to
i haven't read any of her shite since long before the 2012 campaign, but fully agree that rubin is complete dogshit and has been for a long time
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12447 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

It may not be perfect but it surely beats an expansionist Russia.


Maybe, maybe not. You don't know this for certain.

quote:

That's what this is about to the new right's foreign policy...withdrawal from the world


Rand will scale down the involvement for sure, but to call it withdrawal from the world is exaggeration. As president he only would have so much influence.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:17 pm to
900 bases in 150 countries

Think we could use a little withdrawing from the world
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

That's what this is about to the new right's foreign policy...withdrawal from the world.



bullshite. To withdraw from NATO would be a statement that America doesn't need or want to be entangled in every problem that NATO members find themselves in. America can only lose influence and strategic capability that it chooses to ignore or under utilize. If anything NATO membership adds liability to the US government with virtually no net gain of influence or situational awareness.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32659 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

Rand will scale down the involvement for sure, but to call it withdrawal from the world is exaggeration.


That's the direction the Paul family wants to take this county. Rand just candies up his rhetoric a little better.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

quote:

Hopefully, most of them.
Why not just withdraw from NATO then?

That's a good idea. We shouldn't have permanent alliances, just temporary one based on the geopolitics at the time. In 1991, Bush 41 put together the greatest coalition in the history of warfare, but it didn't remain intact once the war was over. One thing that I think George Washington and Thomas Jefferson had right is that we should have no permanent love or permanent hatred of any foreign nation, because nations don't have allies, just interests.
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12447 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:21 pm to
well shite we are 17 trillion in debt.

more frugal overseas spending IS the right direction.
Posted by Zed
Member since Feb 2010
8315 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Rand will scale down the involvement for sure, but to call it withdrawal from the world is exaggeration.
I don't think any of us really know what he'd do. He may be closer to his dad's beliefs than he's acknowledged, which may be just fine with some. I agree he'd be somewhat limited, or more, by the military funding machine, depending on where public opinion goes from here. He makes me a little uneasy, that's all. He's going to have to reassure people.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

That's a good idea. We shouldn't have permanent alliances, just temporary one based on the geopolitics at the time. In 1991, Bush 41 put together the greatest coalition in the history of warfare, but it didn't remain intact once the war was over. One thing that I think George Washington and Thomas Jefferson had right is that we should have no permanent love or permanent hatred of any foreign nation, because nations don't have allies, just interests.



Like a boss. Good post Trackfan!
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32659 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

That's a good idea.


Rand should totally put it on his platform
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:29 pm to
Cut off all foreign aid and vote on measures one by one to see who gets US aid.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80625 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:31 pm to
quote:


Eventually, all of them should be cut. It's not our responsibility to be Europe's bodyguard.


Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138510 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

That's the direction the Paul family wants to take this county. Rand just candies up his rhetoric a little better.


How much is enough?
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32659 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:02 pm to
Your chart may not keep looking that way into the future



Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138510 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

Your chart may not keep looking that way into the future
Exactly!

In fact, if we keep blowing through money borrowed from the Chinese, a great deal of their future growth will be enjoyed as interest payments on our debt.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:31 pm to
quote:



Why not just withdraw from NATO then?


Great idea.

quote:

That's what this is about to the new right's foreign policy...withdrawal from the world.


That's stupid. Great leap there.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram