Started By
Message

re: RAF Fairford New Development: One of the suspects was the first to call authorities

Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:18 pm to
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
3210 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:18 pm to
When I was at Lakenheath and Iraq kicked off we had to send people to help guard the B52s. I never went but did visit the area a couple of times when I was there.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
34555 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

FWIW, I would put the percentage chances as to what happened with RAF Fairford:

-65% busted diesel stealing ring (see post below)
-20% false flag
-15% attempted terror attack


- Dry run to make em think its thwarted before real one
Posted by AndyJ
Member since Jul 2008
3679 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

Five British nationals


Tally ho
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12114 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Dry run to make em think its thwarted before real one


Thanks. That's a good theory I hadn't considered.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 11:26 pm
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
6226 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 3:44 am to
quote:

Most likely a diesel heist, but the call to the authorities actually pushes me closer to possible terrorist plot (the caller got cold feet?).
I think both points could have high possibility.
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2734 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12114 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:27 pm to
Thanks G.

Any information on WHAT the RAF Fairford "incident" was?

Most comments from people in the UK are like the one below (the locals aren't buying that super scary terrorists were released within hours):

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2734 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Any information on WHAT the RAF Fairford "incident" was?


I don’t know.

Me not knowing doesn’t change the fact that Iran was “confirmed” to have “played a part” in it.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12114 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 5:33 pm to
Me not knowing doesn’t change the fact that Iran was “confirmed” to have “played a part” in it.

If it were a diesel heist, doesn't any "confirmation" of Iran's involvement sound like bullshite? Also, Trump and Rubio were careful not to say it wasn't necessarily Iran that was involved. Who is the PM "confirming?"

Do you think baddies acting in concert with Iran would actually be released within hours of capture.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram