- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for judges and attorneys...Where does your morality (if any) come into play ?
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:28 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:28 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He's very dishonest.
Sociopath.
1
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:29 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
This discussion is predicated on them not being followed.
Go read the op again. That is not what the discussion is about
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:42 am to FATBOY TIGER
quote:
You still haven't received a morally honest answer yet?
8 pages in?
There ain't one.
Amazing isn't it.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Government excess
So people think that’s bad?
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:52 am to loogaroo
quote:
Amazing isn't it.
Not really.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'd love someone to explain the morality of a 30-day response time for request for admissions.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:57 am to Godfather1
quote:
Sociopath.
I figured marginally functional autist.
He lacks any personal intuition.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:00 am to Flats
quote:
Government excess
So people think that’s bad?
I guess that depends on the lawyer.
CRT was born in law school. Many are absolute statists.
Look who makes up our govt contingency in DC. We elect lawyers who create more of a need for themselves through legislation and regulation.
Its the biggest crony job in the world.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:01 am to Barrister
quote:Do you?
I think your questions assumes a predicate that does not or should not exist.
So perhaps you can address the question another lawyer here has overlooked.
Did Binger behave ethically in the Rittenhouse trial?
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:04 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
So perhaps you can address the question another lawyer here has overlooked.
Overlooked or deliberately ignored?
He’s already walked back his earlier statement about the law and morality.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Unless you are an OP alter, you don't know that. You may want to frame it that way to deflect, but that your deal. Not the OP's.
Go read the op again. That is not what the discussion is about
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:06 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
but that your deal.
I honestly think he has major holes in his worldview and cannot see things the way normal people do.
I'm still divided if this is a shitty act or he's really that sociopathic.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:19 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I figured marginally functional autist.
That and being a sociopath aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:21 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Look who makes up our govt contingency in DC. We elect lawyers who create more of a need for themselves through legislation and regulation.
Absolutely this.
It’s a self-perpetuating game.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:21 am to Godfather1
quote:
That and being a sociopath aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive.
Yeah, the symptoms probably look very similar. My older brother is a CPA, he's got the issue. But... he can deep dive academically.
This post was edited on 5/21/24 at 10:22 am
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:22 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yeah, the symptoms probably look very similar.
I mean, I agree with you. There’s a reason I refer to him as “Spectrum”.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:24 am to Flats
quote:
So people think that’s bad?
I think most people think it's good, sadly. Why our fedgov has gotten so big and our Constitutional rights have become so trampled.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:28 am to RogerTheShrubber
It is not immoral to defend a client who killed someone. Someone accused of a crime has rights that need to be defended. Otherwise you just lynch people in a mob, on the basis of an accuser who may have dark motives. You defend the process and the rights of a defendant, not his conduct. The result is no one fears a knock in the night to be hauled into jail for dictator’s retribution or unlimited bad reasons. If you cant grasp this it is not the fault of the judicial system.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:35 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Did Binger behave ethically in the Rittenhouse trial?
It was unprofessional for sure, but unethical is probably a stretch. The judge also addressed the issue directly and pretty emphatically.
The larger problem was the judge being wishy washy about ruling on certain motions. Had he been stronger pre-trial, it's unlikely the door was opened, and, had Binger attempted the same course, THEN it would be in the realm of ethical violation.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:37 am to zeebo
quote:
It is not immoral to defend a client who killed someone.
I literally brought this up earlier, with no response, either.
I have represented a person who killed another person. I got the charges dismissed. Was that immoral?
Page 9 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News