- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Promethean Updates - The 118-Year Empire Trump Just Ended
Posted on 3/1/26 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/1/26 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
would never watch the content creators in OP to see an actual reasoning for anything in reality.
This motherfricker can't even be bothered to watch the content. He's just in here arguing to argue and he is responsible for like half the posts in this thread.
What a dipshit.
1
Posted on 3/1/26 at 9:47 am to Blitzed
quote:
Would it not be reasonable for some people to think some weird satanic shite could be going on?
Considering why he laughed at Christians and all the direct evidence for that, yes. Epstein was Jewish and thought they were superior to Christians. That has nothing to do with Satan.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 9:48 am to AlterEd
quote:
This motherfricker can't even be bothered to watch the content.
Let me guess.
They bring up the UK and its banking system
They show purposefully edited clips and editorialize without the full context.
Am I right so far?
Posted on 3/1/26 at 9:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Am I right so far?
I'll leave you to flap your gums from a place of ignorance. If you won't even watch the video there is no point in anyone discussing this with you.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 9:55 am to SlowFlowPro
They are offering an opinion on current events through the lens of their own research and insights. I posted it as an interesting take that does not follow the current commentary. And, as usual, you have to SFP the thread. Congrats.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 9:56 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
you have to SFP the thread
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:00 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
They are offering an opinion on current events
Sure. And I'm saying it's such a bad one you can't even call it a bad one.
quote:
I posted it as an interesting take that does not follow the current commentary.
They have become a popular content creator in the echo chamber so it's not that interesting.
quote:
And, as usual, you have to SFP the thread.
Do you jump in to protect idiot leftists when people make fun of them being idiots on here? Because I'm just calling idiotic takes out for being idiotic the way leftists get called out on here routinely.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:03 am to Wolfhound45
I think there are a few problems with her theory, but overall it seems pretty solid.
The main problem is that the overthrow of the Shah in 1979 led to anti-western policies. Iran nationalized it's oil production after this. The claim that one puppet replaced another is kinda hard to buy.
Also, Khomeini was shia. The MB are sunni.
The main problem is that the overthrow of the Shah in 1979 led to anti-western policies. Iran nationalized it's oil production after this. The claim that one puppet replaced another is kinda hard to buy.
Also, Khomeini was shia. The MB are sunni.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 10:07 am
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:03 am to deltadummy
quote:
What an ugly broad.
She's an old woman baw
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:07 am to AlterEd
quote:
The claim that one puppet replaced another is kinda hard to buy.
Beyond that. It's utterly retarded.
Iran post-Shah has been an incredible disruptor for whatever interests you could imagine for that cabal of world-controllers.
The typical pivot for the CT types is the MIC stuff, but if these people are truly banking elites, they would make more money with a world at peace controlling the money of a growing world economy. Military operations can provide funding but the cause of the wars and the disruptions of the wars cost even more in terms of economies. Peace in the modern Western economic reality is much more profitable for bankers than war.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:09 am to SlowFlowPro
What kind of fricked up reality do you have?
You protest the OP premise video you refuse to watch...like a pigeon shitting all over this thread...
All under the guise of saying it is a "Rothchild" chantard conspiracy...
If you would watch the video you would see facts not conspiracy...
You protest the OP premise video you refuse to watch...like a pigeon shitting all over this thread...
All under the guise of saying it is a "Rothchild" chantard conspiracy...
If you would watch the video you would see facts not conspiracy...
quote:
Peter Mandelson, 72, a former UK Labour cabinet minister and recent UK ambassador to the US, was arrested by Metropolitan Police on February 23, 2026, on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The arrest relates to allegations he passed sensitive government information to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, following the release of documents in the US Epstein probe. He was released on bail.
Arrest Details and Allegations (Feb 2026)
Charges: Suspicion of misconduct in public office regarding ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Allegations: Documents suggest Mandelson shared confidential, market-sensitive information with Epstein in 2009, including government asset sale plans.
Process: Arrested at his London home, held for nine hours, and released on bail. His lawyers described the arrest as based on a "complete fiction" that he was a flight risk.
Context: The investigation follows his dismissal as UK ambassador to the US by Prime Minister Keir Starmer in September 2025 due to his continued friendship with Epstein.
Background and Career
Political Career: A key architect of the "New Labour" movement in the 1990s alongside Tony Blair.
Roles: Served as MP for Hartlepool and in several high-profile cabinet roles, including Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.
Resignations: Previously resigned from government twice, first in 1998 over a secret home loan.
"Prince of Darkness": Known for his role as a spin doctor and key strategist in British politics for decades.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 10:10 am
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
You get called idiotic because…
Wait for it…
You are idiotic.
Wait for it…
You are idiotic.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:13 am to Wolfhound45
"SFP the thread"
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:25 am to cajunangelle
quote:
All under the guise of saying it is a "Rothchild" chantard conspiracy...
Note: I did not say this. Strannix tried to make this argument and I separated the two conceptually.
His post (not mine)
quote:
City of London Banking = Rothschilds et al
My resopnse
quote:
Yes I discussed this in a previous thread.
They're trying to merge the Rothschild conspiracy theories with a new angle to double down on the stupidity for people who want to believe the idiocy.
I'm 0.0% shocked you, of all people, thought you were proving me wrong by proving my point above
Try to follow the discussion and not create staw men.
quote:
Peter Mandelson, 72, a former UK Labour cabinet minister and recent UK ambassador to the US, was arrested by Metropolitan Police on February 23, 2026, on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The arrest relates to allegations he passed sensitive government information to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, following the release of documents in the US Epstein probe. He was released on bail.
Has nothing to do with anything. Again, the typical "kernel of truth" used top spin CT yarn. Yes, he was associated with Epstein. What does that have to do with anything, specifically Iran?
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I separated the two conceptually
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:27 am to Wolfhound45
I found all their videos. I'm going to go binge watch them where I left off.
Smart ladies.
Smart ladies.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:30 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Smart ladies.
They know their shite, but they may have an agenda. As I said, the idea that the 1979 revolution was something that the west wanted to happen seems kinda silly because it promptly bit them in the arse. It's a tough sell to claim that this was a British thing backed by the Muslim Brotherhood who are philosophically opposed to the Ayatollah.
I still think their videos are worth watching though.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 10:31 am
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:34 am to AlterEd
Not following your logic. The USA has historically led on things that bit them in the arse.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:38 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Not following your logic.
Well, in the video she claims that the US and the Brits were supportive of the overthrow of the Shah and that the City of London continued to control Iran through the Muslim Brotherhood thereafter. But in reality, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Ayatollah of Iran were philosophically opposed. Khomeini being Shia, the Brotherhood being Sunni. Further, Iran immediately nationalized it's oil production and began waging terror campaigns against western interests.
The claim that one puppet replaced another seems false. BP was no longer taking in huge profits in Iran. Instead the west had to put sanctions on Iranian oil production.
Furthermore, the 79 revolution was a popular uprising against the Western-aligned monarchy. Kinda hard to argue that the west had anything to do with that.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 10:41 am
Posted on 3/1/26 at 10:40 am to Wolfhound45
VERY interesting
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News