Started By
Message
locked post

Progressives need to admit Trump was right about one thing

Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:16 pm
Posted by Eightballjacket
Member since Jan 2016
7311 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:16 pm
These illegal immigrants are coming here from shithole countries. All illegal immigrant detainees should be made to wear t-shirts saying, "I left my shithole country for America."
Posted by RentSeekAndDestroy
Member since Mar 2018
602 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:18 pm to
Not only are they coming from shithole countries, but they are also the dregs of society from these countries (they are not sending their best, folks).
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
16396 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:32 pm to
These over the top racist comments are completely uncalled for
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37683 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:34 pm to
What in his comment could possibly be construed as racist?
Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
17111 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:35 pm to
My question is: How are they getting here? Who is funding it? I can’t travel 6 hours without spending $100. And all the way though Mexico? That’s quite a haul.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

These over the top truthful statements trigger me bigly


Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14786 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

These illegal immigrants are coming here from shithole countries.


K. Feel better?
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45707 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:39 pm to
It sucks for the people in those countries that their conditions are the result of ages of corruption and profiteering. That said, the USA doesn't owe them a damn thing other than the right to come here LEGALLY.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

those countries that their conditions are the result of ages of corruption and profiteering. That said, the USA doesn't owe them a damn thing

Even when we were the ones profiteering?

Intervention:

Panama, U.S. interventions in the isthmus go back to the 1846 Mallarino–Bidlack Treaty and intensified after the so-called Watermelon War of 1856. In 1903, Panama seceded from the Republic of Colombia, backed by the U.S. government,[a] during the Thousand Days' War. The Panama Canal was under construction by then, and the Panama Canal Zone, under United States sovereignty, was created.

Spanish–American War, U.S. forces seize Cuba and Puerto Rico from Spain in 1898.

Cuba, occupied by the U.S. from 1898 to 1902 under military governor Leonard Wood, and again from 1906 to 1909, 1912, and 1917 to 1922; subject to the terms of the Cuban–American Treaty of Relations (1903) until 1934. In 1903 took a permanent lease on the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base.

Dominican Republic, action in 1903, 1904 (the Santo Domingo Affair), and 1914 (Naval forces engage in battles in the city of Santo Domingo[4]); occupied by the U.S. from 1916 to 1924.

Nicaragua, which, after intermittent landings and naval bombardments in the previous decades, was occupied by the U.S. almost continuously from 1912 to 1933.

Mexico, The U.S. military involvements with Mexico in this period are related to the same general commercial and political causes, but stand as a special case. The Americans conducted the Border War with Mexico from 1910-1919 for additional reasons: to control the flow of immigrants and refugees from revolutionary Mexico (pacificos), and to counter rebel raids into U.S. territory. The 1914 U.S. occupation of Veracruz, however, was an exercise of armed influence, not an issue of border integrity; it was aimed at cutting off the supplies of German munitions to the government of Mexican leader Victoriano Huerta,[5] which U.S. President Woodrow Wilson refused to recognize.[5] In the years prior to World War I, the U.S. was also alert to the regional balance of power against Germany. The Germans were actively arming and advising the Mexicans, as shown by the 1914 SS Ypiranga arms-shipping incident, German saboteur Lothar Witzke's base in Mexico City, the 1917 Zimmermann Telegram and German advisors present during the 1918 Battle of Ambos Nogales. Only twice during the Mexican Revolution did the U.S. military occupy Mexico: during the temporary occupation of Veracruz in 1914 and between 1916 and 1917, when U.S. General John Pershing led U.S. Army forces on a nationwide search for Pancho Villa.

Haiti, occupied by the U.S. from 1915–1934, which led to the creation of a new Haitian constitution in 1917 that instituted changes that included an end to the prior ban on land ownership by non-Haitians. This period included the First and Second Caco Wars.[6]

Honduras, where the United Fruit Company and Standard Fruit Company dominated the country's key banana export sector and associated land holdings and railways, saw insertion of American troops in 1903, 1907, 1911, 1912, 1919, 1924 and 1925. The writer O. Henry coined the term "Banana republic" in 1904 to describe Honduras.[7]

Other Latin American nations were influenced or dominated by American economic policies and/or commercial interests to the point of coercion. Theodore Roosevelt declared the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine in 1904, asserting the right of the United States to intervene to stabilize the economic affairs of states in the Caribbean and Central America if they were unable to pay their international debts. From 1909-1913, President William Howard Taft and his Secretary of State Philander C. Knox asserted a more "peaceful and economic" Dollar Diplomacy foreign policy, although that too was backed by force, as in Nicaragua.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26436 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:49 pm to
Trump could cure cancer and HIV, they'd still say he was Hitler...
This post was edited on 6/20/18 at 12:50 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162194 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Not only are they coming from shithole countries, but they are also the dregs of society from these countries

Not necessarily

quote:

(they are not sending their best, folks)

No one is "sending" anyone.

I don't think you have the faintest concept of how any of this works
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162194 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 12:52 pm to
quote:


Even when we were the ones profiteering?


The most recent date on your TL;DR list of U.S. involvement is 1925

Forgive me if I don't think that's anything that has any effect on the state of those countries today

Mexico if it were run similar to the U.S. would have a thriving economy.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112410 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 1:01 pm to
Labeling some countries as 'shitholes' involves artificially created hierarchies. It's like saying having electricity is better than not having it. Who can say that the people in the Amazon are not happier without it?
Zach studied post mod all through the 1970s when it was just breaking out.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112410 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

No one is "sending" anyone.


Well, the latest info is that 80% of the children are not coming here with their parents. So, the parents are 'sending' them with somebody.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

The most recent date on your TL;DR list of U.S. involvement is 1925

Forgive me if I don't think that's anything that has any effect on the state of those countries today

Seriously?


The 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état was a covert operation carried out by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that deposed the democratically elected Guatemalan President Jacobo Árbenz and ended the Guatemalan Revolution of 1944–1954. Code-named Operation PBSUCCESS, it installed the military dictatorship of Carlos Castillo Armas, the first in a series of U.S.-backed authoritarian rulers in Guatemala.

Background Information and the Precipitation of the Contra Conflict

In 1961, the Frente Sandinista de Liberacion Nacional (FSLN) was founded in Havana, Cuba. The development of the FSLN represented the merger of "Carlos Fonseca's Nicaraguan Patriotic Youth organization ... with Tomas Borge's Cuban-supported insurgent group."[2] The FSLN remained a largely unsuccessful and marginal political movement until 1972, when an earthquake rocked the Nicaraguan capital, Managua. The Somoza government, which had assumed control of Nicaragua shortly following the withdrawal of United States military personnel in 1933, was seen to be profiteering from international relief efforts in the immediate aftermath of the earthquake. This led to a dramatic change in the influence and importance of the FSLN as their position within the Nicaraguan public sentiment began a rapid ascension. Between 1972 and 1978, fighting between the FSLN guerrillas and the Nicaraguan National Guard steadily increased. In 1978 "Pedro Joaquin Chamorro, editor of the opposition newspaper La Prensa" was assassinated; this caused widespread protests and an increase of support from the FSLN including "non-Marxist groups."[3] The opposition to the oppressive Somoza government was beginning to come to a head.

The Ouster of Somoza

In February 1979, the United States suspended all foreign aid to Nicaragua due to Somoza's unwillingness to compromise. By July, he had fled the country. FSLN Sandinista forces quickly assumed power in Managua, and the United States quickly moved to recognize the legitimacy of the new government and offer aid, however the FSLN chose instead to look to global Communist interests including the Soviets and Cubans for support. By 1980, the Government of National Recognition (GRN) under Cuban influence had begun installing pro-Marxist, anti-U.S. doctrine into the Nicaraguan educational system.[2] U.S. policy on Nicaragua began to favor support for anti-Sandinista "contras," because most people involved in the U.S. intelligence operations, including Richard Nixon feared that "defeat for the rebels would probably lead to a violent Marxist guerrilla movement in Mexico and in other Central American countries."[4]


The Bay of Pigs Invasion (Spanish: Invasión de Playa Girón or Invasión de Bahía de Cochinos or Batalla de Girón) was a failed military invasion of Cuba undertaken by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)-sponsored paramilitary group Brigade 2506 on 17 April 1961. A counter-revolutionary military group (made up of mostly Cuban exiles who traveled to the United States after Castro's takeover, but also some US military personnel[6]), trained and funded by the CIA, Brigade 2506 fronted the armed wing of the Democratic Revolutionary Front (DRF) and intended to overthrow the increasingly communist government of Fidel Castro. Launched from Guatemala and Nicaragua, the invading force was defeated within three days by the Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces, under the direct command of Castro.

The coup of 1952 led by General Fulgencio Batista, an ally of the United States, against President Carlos Prio, forced Prio into exile to Miami, Florida. Prio's exile was the reason for the 26th July Movement led by Castro. The movement, which did not succeed until after the Cuban Revolution of 31 December 1958, severed the country's formerly strong links with the US after nationalizing American economic assets (banks, oil refineries, sugar and coffee plantations, along with other American owned businesses).

Under the rule of the Dictator Marcos Perez Jimenez, the Venezuelan economy experienced a boom, born from Venezuela's great oil wealth. During this prosperity, foreign investment, particularly from American oil companies, grew along with the support from the Jimenez Regime. The staunchly anti-communist regime allowed and supported the exploitation of the country's natural resources by the American oil industry, as a portion of the profits made its way from companies like Mobil and Exxon[7] to the personal coffers of Perez Jimenez. For his support of these American companies, he received the Legion of Merit from the U.S. Government in 1954.[8]

At the same time, United States intelligence agencies collaborated with Perez's Seguridad Nacional to silence communists and social-democrat voices in Venezuela. The Seguridad Nacional, headed by Pedro Estrada, disappeared and tortured thousands of Venezuelans, both in its headquarters in Caracas and in a confinement camp on Guasina Island in the jungles of the Orinoco. When Jimenez abandoned the government and the country on January 23, 1958, more than 400 prisoners were found in the basement of the headquarters of the Seguridad Nacional.[9]



What's the character limit on this board again...?

We've been fricking around in countries south of our border since the Monroe Doctrine.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112410 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

We've been fricking around in countries south of our border since the Monroe Doctrine.


Nope. We've been trying to civilize them. It was a waste of time.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 1:16 pm to



You never learn, do you Zach?
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26654 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Haiti, occupied by the U.S. from 1915–1934, which led to the creation of a new Haitian constitution in 1917 that instituted changes that included an end to the prior ban on land ownership by non-Haitians. This period included the First and Second Caco Wars.[6]


Really?

Haiti was the richest country in the western hemisphere at one time, until they threw out all the white people.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 1:54 pm to
the fact that you have 22 upvotes as I post paints a perfect picture of the rampant stupidity from the right on this board.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 6/20/18 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

the fact that you have 22 upvotes as I post paints a perfect picture of the rampant stupidity from the right on this board.




Really? Why is that?

Do you REALLY consider yourself to be smarter than the right on this board? I mean, we are, after all, rampantly stupid, right?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram