re: Pride month has virtually zero effect on me. Some of yall seem extremely impacted by it

quote:

---

I never said it wasn't, in fact, I agreed with that I simply stated we tend to overlook our own sins while pointing out others and also found it interesting that Jesus never felt it was important enough to discuss but adultery was very sinful and constantly preached about it.

---

Apparently homosexuality wasn’t as rampant in 1st century Israel like it was in Rome, which is why Jesus didn’t need to mention it explicitly while Paul did.

However, Jesus did implicitly teach against it. He taught that to lust in your heart for another person who wasn’t your spouse was sin, and He affirmed that marriage was between one man and one woman. The logical conclusion is that all sexual activity (and even heart-lust) outside of marriage was sinful, and there was no such thing as “gay marriage” to make it lawful for homosexuals. Therefore, homosexuals would need to remain “eunuchs” for the sake of Christ, and not engage in any sexual activity.

quote:

---

So shouldn't anyone that has ever committed adultery be looked upon as bad, if not more sinful in Jesus's eyes?

---

No, not “more sinful”, but certainly sinful. Adultery should be rejected by Christians and all adulterers should repent of their sin.

Naw weird not a single email about peter puffer month within the DOW!

The distinction you made about the “ceremonial and moral” are at no point addressed in the Bible nor is that distinction made by Paul which is the nonsensical argument you are attempting to make. You do understand that the 10 Commandments were the foundation for the rest of the Law of Moses in Deuteronomy and Leviticus? There were dozens, probably hundreds, governing moral authority. You also understand that God created the Law and Jesus’ authority came from God? He didn’t magically change what is morally wrong like a middle aged man having a midlife crisis lol Jesus did in fact fulfill the Law on the cross, however Jesus spoke about the Law quite often but when it came to sexual immorality he didn’t somehow soften the morality God created. He in fact went further than the Law by commenting on our very thoughts or lust which wasn’t condemned under the Law. Paul addresses sexual immorality quite often as well. It is true that sin is sin and shouldn’t be condoned but the last time I checked I haven’t heard a politician campaign on adultery, theft, murder, etc. but they do campaign on gay pride, transgender ideology, and victimhood which are diametrically opposed to God’s morality. So, while it is true we should condemn all wrongs but only one major party makes obviously sinful behavior the cornerstone of their political agenda

quote:

---

I haven’t heard a politician campaign on adultery, theft,

---

Paxton does.

You seem to have a pattern.

quote:

---

You seem to have a pattern.

---

True.

He is in bitch mode.

quote:

---

He is in bitch mode.

---

I’m in laugh at the bitch mode.

You said Paxton is campaigning on adultery and theft.

So, prove it.

Let’s see an ad where he is doing so.

Lol pony indeed.