- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:08 pm to Pecker
quote:
Telling his side of the story isn’t pleading the 5th
Yeeeahh....testifying as to facts under oath is a bit different than "telling your side of a "story".
Bless your heart.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:13 pm to Bunyan
Anyone, especially one in such a high-profile position, who thinks their text messages will remain private is a total dumb-arse.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:18 pm to Pecker
quote:
Doesn’t disqualify one from being an FBI agent. What’s your point?
Point? You're confused.
Your claim was that Trump supporters defended infidelity. When it was pointed out that you're full of crap, you change the subject.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:55 pm to Pecker
quote:
Doesn’t disqualify one from being an FBI agent. What’s your point?
You aren't half as clever as you think you are. Im sure you thought this was some great "gotcha" which is what the left has been reduced to.
Hes not going to Congress to defend his character because hes being accused of being an adulterer but you knew that.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:22 pm to AUstar
quote:Ollie North had limited immunity IIRC.
I could be wrong, but I think all testimony to Congress is under oath.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:28 pm to Decatur
You guys, come on. I didn’t really mean it when i said we’d stop Trump. Thats just part of my personal political values. It was just muh 1st amendment rights to openly collude to stop the duly elected president from carrying out his term.
Ok, pal
Ok, pal
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:32 pm to LSUnation78
While Strzok told investigators that his message was an attempt to assure Page that Trump would not win the election, there are surely better ways he could have communicated that. Moreover, when asked why they were using work phones to conduct private conversations, Page responded with an answered that revealed a striking level of unprofessionalism.
“The predominant reason that we communicated on our work phones was because we were trying to keep our affair a secret from our spouses,” she told investigators. These revelations about the conduct between Page and Strzok require far more scrutiny than the mainstream media has given thus far. The Justice Department inspector general said the office was “deeply troubled” by the content of these messages and said they “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.”
Odd way of saying it, if you aren't really going to "stop" it.
“The predominant reason that we communicated on our work phones was because we were trying to keep our affair a secret from our spouses,” she told investigators. These revelations about the conduct between Page and Strzok require far more scrutiny than the mainstream media has given thus far. The Justice Department inspector general said the office was “deeply troubled” by the content of these messages and said they “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.”
Odd way of saying it, if you aren't really going to "stop" it.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:33 pm to Jbird
quote:
Ollie North had limited immunity IIRC.
Congress specifically gave him immunity to testify. Strzok has not been offered such. Either way, I am pretty sure his testimony will be under oath.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:35 pm to AUstar
quote:Maybe not, I won't rely on his personal attorney to present the facts in this, he is trying to paint loverboy in a favorable light.
Strzok has not been offered such.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:39 pm to Decatur
“He thinks that his position, character and actions have all been misrepresented and caricatured, and he wants an opportunity to remedy that,” the lawyer said.
Hang that motherfricker
Hang that motherfricker
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:39 pm to 56lsu
quote:
you’ve worn out dumbass
Not nearly to the degree that the MSM has worn out “Russian collusion”, try again dipshit.
Is that better?
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:41 pm to Wild Thang
quote:He had an opportunity to remedy that when interviewed by the OIG, seems he missed that chance.
“He thinks that his position, character and actions have all been misrepresented and caricatured, and he wants an opportunity to remedy that,” the lawyer said.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 7:06 pm to LSURulzSEC
by who you key board bad asses. doubt it.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 7:09 pm to Wolfhound45
I always enjoyed your replys, never figured you for a sheep following along with the crowd.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 8:33 pm to 56lsu
Baw, I will gladly (GLADLY) discuss the behavior of our President. I do not consider him a role model in the least bit. He is a deeply flawed man. And only after Progressive thugs attacked his rally in San Jose was I willing to cast a vote for him. But anyone (ANYONE) who cites Russian collusion as the reason that Hillary Rodham Clinton lost the 2016 election is an absolute and utter dumbass. Period.
Posted on 6/17/18 at 9:13 pm to Pecker
quote:
This board is full of loons. It’s basically the exact political inverse of the DU
Rex got banned from DU for being too conservative. Don't ever compare anything to the pit of misery that is DU.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 9:16 am to Decatur
quote:I wonder if he is willing to return Rexcatur?
Peter Strzok willing to testify before Congress
Posted on 5/8/20 at 9:20 am to Jbird
quote:
I wonder if he is willing to return Rexcatur?
It’d be interesting to see just what parts of his testimony he’d like to walk back now.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News