Started By
Message

re: Peter Strzok willing to testify before Congress

Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:00 pm to
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
77298 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:00 pm to
you should feel fortunate this is not ancient Sparta you would have been thrown off the cliff for sure and the world would have been spared your stupidity...
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:08 pm to
quote:


Telling his side of the story isn’t pleading the 5th


Yeeeahh....testifying as to facts under oath is a bit different than "telling your side of a "story".

Bless your heart.
Posted by LL7
Houston
Member since Mar 2010
3222 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:13 pm to
Anyone, especially one in such a high-profile position, who thinks their text messages will remain private is a total dumb-arse.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:18 pm to
quote:


Doesn’t disqualify one from being an FBI agent. What’s your point?


Point? You're confused.
Your claim was that Trump supporters defended infidelity. When it was pointed out that you're full of crap, you change the subject.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Doesn’t disqualify one from being an FBI agent. What’s your point?


You aren't half as clever as you think you are. Im sure you thought this was some great "gotcha" which is what the left has been reduced to.


Hes not going to Congress to defend his character because hes being accused of being an adulterer but you knew that.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73432 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

I could be wrong, but I think all testimony to Congress is under oath.
Ollie North had limited immunity IIRC.
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
12065 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:28 pm to
You guys, come on. I didn’t really mean it when i said we’d stop Trump. Thats just part of my personal political values. It was just muh 1st amendment rights to openly collude to stop the duly elected president from carrying out his term.


Ok, pal
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73432 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:32 pm to
While Strzok told investigators that his message was an attempt to assure Page that Trump would not win the election, there are surely better ways he could have communicated that. Moreover, when asked why they were using work phones to conduct private conversations, Page responded with an answered that revealed a striking level of unprofessionalism.
“The predominant reason that we communicated on our work phones was because we were trying to keep our affair a secret from our spouses,” she told investigators. These revelations about the conduct between Page and Strzok require far more scrutiny than the mainstream media has given thus far. The Justice Department inspector general said the office was “deeply troubled” by the content of these messages and said they “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.”

Odd way of saying it, if you aren't really going to "stop" it.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17009 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Ollie North had limited immunity IIRC.



Congress specifically gave him immunity to testify. Strzok has not been offered such. Either way, I am pretty sure his testimony will be under oath.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73432 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Strzok has not been offered such.
Maybe not, I won't rely on his personal attorney to present the facts in this, he is trying to paint loverboy in a favorable light.
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:39 pm to
“He thinks that his position, character and actions have all been misrepresented and caricatured, and he wants an opportunity to remedy that,” the lawyer said.



Hang that motherfricker
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

you’ve worn out dumbass


Not nearly to the degree that the MSM has worn out “Russian collusion”, try again dipshit.

Is that better?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73432 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

“He thinks that his position, character and actions have all been misrepresented and caricatured, and he wants an opportunity to remedy that,” the lawyer said.
He had an opportunity to remedy that when interviewed by the OIG, seems he missed that chance.
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 7:06 pm to
by who you key board bad asses. doubt it.
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 7:07 pm to
(no message)
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 7:09 pm to
I always enjoyed your replys, never figured you for a sheep following along with the crowd.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 8:33 pm to
Baw, I will gladly (GLADLY) discuss the behavior of our President. I do not consider him a role model in the least bit. He is a deeply flawed man. And only after Progressive thugs attacked his rally in San Jose was I willing to cast a vote for him. But anyone (ANYONE) who cites Russian collusion as the reason that Hillary Rodham Clinton lost the 2016 election is an absolute and utter dumbass. Period.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16170 posts
Posted on 6/17/18 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

This board is full of loons. It’s basically the exact political inverse of the DU




Rex got banned from DU for being too conservative. Don't ever compare anything to the pit of misery that is DU.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73432 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Peter Strzok willing to testify before Congress
I wonder if he is willing to return Rexcatur?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79643 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 9:20 am to
quote:

I wonder if he is willing to return Rexcatur?


It’d be interesting to see just what parts of his testimony he’d like to walk back now.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram