- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/6/19 at 2:24 pm to bmy
quote:
She's right. But she should still strive to be equitable.
You just proved the "shite for Brains" narrative. Thanks!
Posted on 10/6/19 at 2:45 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
She made up the term impeachment 'inquiry,' therefore it is unconstitutional. There is no inquiry, if there is a crime you file and do it
This whole sham is ridiculous. Its not official till they find somethin /make something....then it will be official.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:01 pm to troyt37
quote:
Now are you going to answer my question? Does being a potential candidate preclude the sitting president from calling for an investigation of potential corruption?
I wouldn't say it precludes it.
I would suggest avoiding even the appearance of corruption by not waiting until the week after said potential candidate announces his campaign though. Especially if the POTUS campaigned on fighting corruption/draining the swamp.
POTUS should probably call for an investigation lead by his own country instead of asking the leaders of foreign nations to do so in exchange for support/access.. that would be a really good place to start I think.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:41 pm to bmy
quote:
I would suggest avoiding even the appearance of corruption by not waiting until the week after said potential candidate announces his campaign though. Especially if the POTUS campaigned on fighting corruption/draining the swamp.
I would suggest that giving a shite about the Biden announcement timeline speaks much more to the appearance of corruption on the president’s part, but then it’s really a no win situation for the president on the subject with shitbags like you, isn’t it? If Trump does it before Biden announces, it’s corruption in an effort to sabotage Biden’s potential candidacy. We already know how you feel about doing it after Biden announced. If Trump does it on into the socialist democrat primary, the appearance of corruption is to sabotage a potential nominee. When would have been a good time to do it, where you wouldn’t detect the appearance of corruption?
quote:
POTUS should probably call for an investigation lead by his own country instead of asking the leaders of foreign nations to do so in exchange for support/access.. that would be a really good place to start I think.
Link? You either have the QPQ, or you’re full of shite. If you got it, post it.
Popular
Back to top


0





