Started By
Message

re: Pelosi rejects request to suspend Impeachment Inquiry, Insists no vote needed

Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:22 pm to
Where did you go chickenshit? I thought you wanted to have a discussion?
Posted by LsuFan_1955
Slidell, La
Member since Jul 2013
1908 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

She's right. But she should still strive to be equitable.


You just proved the "shite for Brains" narrative. Thanks!
Posted by Vestigial Morgan
Member since Apr 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

She made up the term impeachment 'inquiry,' therefore it is unconstitutional. There is no inquiry, if there is a crime you file and do it


This whole sham is ridiculous. Its not official till they find somethin /make something....then it will be official.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:01 pm to
quote:


Now are you going to answer my question? Does being a potential candidate preclude the sitting president from calling for an investigation of potential corruption?



I wouldn't say it precludes it.

I would suggest avoiding even the appearance of corruption by not waiting until the week after said potential candidate announces his campaign though. Especially if the POTUS campaigned on fighting corruption/draining the swamp.

POTUS should probably call for an investigation lead by his own country instead of asking the leaders of foreign nations to do so in exchange for support/access.. that would be a really good place to start I think.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 7:04 pm
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

I would suggest avoiding even the appearance of corruption by not waiting until the week after said potential candidate announces his campaign though. Especially if the POTUS campaigned on fighting corruption/draining the swamp.



I would suggest that giving a shite about the Biden announcement timeline speaks much more to the appearance of corruption on the president’s part, but then it’s really a no win situation for the president on the subject with shitbags like you, isn’t it? If Trump does it before Biden announces, it’s corruption in an effort to sabotage Biden’s potential candidacy. We already know how you feel about doing it after Biden announced. If Trump does it on into the socialist democrat primary, the appearance of corruption is to sabotage a potential nominee. When would have been a good time to do it, where you wouldn’t detect the appearance of corruption?

quote:

POTUS should probably call for an investigation lead by his own country instead of asking the leaders of foreign nations to do so in exchange for support/access.. that would be a really good place to start I think.


Link? You either have the QPQ, or you’re full of shite. If you got it, post it.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram