- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelosi names peach mint managers
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:51 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:51 pm to cajunangelle
Question - Even though some of these pukes were named as managers, can they still be subpoenaed for questioning under oath?
2
Posted on 1/15/20 at 2:15 pm to Dead Man Walking
Good question. Does it matter? Was it Schiff for brains that already said he would ignore a subpoena, then saw his hypocrite self and reshuffled his statement.
I want the whistle blower and Brennan subpoenaed. I want to know to what extent did Brennan arrange a corrupt spook IG; and when he briefed dems months ago... was he telling them how to use lawfare blogger POS lawyers and when?
I want the whistle blower and Brennan subpoenaed. I want to know to what extent did Brennan arrange a corrupt spook IG; and when he briefed dems months ago... was he telling them how to use lawfare blogger POS lawyers and when?
Posted on 1/15/20 at 2:18 pm to Dead Man Walking
quote:
Question - Even though some of these pukes were named as managers, can they still be subpoenaed for questioning under oath?
I would think so.
I mean, Nadler’s committee had a Lawfare counsel who testified as a witness in the morning, then returned to counsel’s chair and questioned other witnesses in the afternoon. The precedent is set by the Dems themselves.
This post was edited on 1/15/20 at 2:19 pm
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News