- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Palmer Luckey is a racist! Am I doing this right?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:47 am
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:47 am
quote:
We cannot let them stay.
Debates regarding illegal immigration often focus on policy issues like welfare, healthcare, crime, economic contribution, etc. That is a distraction.
Democracy is the real issue. Status quo is that any city or state desirous of greater power can declare a suspension of federal law and import millions of illegal aliens for the purpose of inflating their electoral votes and Congressional representation.
Arguments about illegal immigrants voting directly in elections fraudulently usually miss this point. If you offer the political architects of these rebellions a trade, permanent amnesty and residency for all aliens with clear agreement that they cannot be counted for the purposes of electing our President or Congress, they will adamantly refuse.
Why? Because the people pushing this do not want immigrants from socially-conservative countries in Latin America to actually vote. They want to vote on their behalf via census representation, much like reconstruction-era Southern states demanded for newly-freed slaves. Their ideal situation is an urban core of deeply aligned ideologues voting with the power of millions of illegal aliens, currently worth dozens of Congressman and eight states worth of electoral votes.
There is an effectively unlimited supply of poor people from poor countries that want to live in the United States who can be used to fuel this strategy. Some might be net positive to the US economy, some might not be, but that is beside the point - all would equally contribute to a future where minority rules the majority with no recourse.
Rewarding states that refuse to recognize the legitimacy of American law ensures other states will use these same tactics, if only to maintain their own relative power. It will end our republic.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Facebook bought his company out, then fired him after he made a $9K donation to a pro-Trump PAC.
Now the dude is making cool shite for our military and has F you money
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:57 am to stout
It’s been awhile since I’ve read on it, but I believe SCOTUS was the one who said count illegals for the census.
It seems like a reasonable thing Republicans in Congress could pass to abrogate that ruling and guard against what Luckey is pointing out here.
It seems like a reasonable thing Republicans in Congress could pass to abrogate that ruling and guard against what Luckey is pointing out here.
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 7:58 am
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:57 am to stout
The good news on the America First front and people in general that want limit immigration to prevent voting fraud as the OP tweet alludes to, is that upon the precipice of a so called AI revolution the Big Tech oligarchs are talking about the issue of displaced workers with AI. I've heard conversations with David Sacks and the NVIDA guys state that liberal immigration policies will have to be drastically scaled back so that worker displacement (via AI) can be managed a little easier. They were talking about all the truck and taxi drivers, administrators (especially in health and medicine), more Ag workers that will be displaced in the near future as examples.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:58 am to stout
I’ve been trying to get people to realize this for years.
In a nutshell…
They apportion Congress based on the census and count illegals in said census.
A California citizen is therefore overrepresented in Congress because *CA has more Congressmen per citizen.*
This is why they fought Trump’s citizenship question during the last census run up.
In a nutshell…
They apportion Congress based on the census and count illegals in said census.
A California citizen is therefore overrepresented in Congress because *CA has more Congressmen per citizen.*
This is why they fought Trump’s citizenship question during the last census run up.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 8:01 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Republicans in Congress
Midterms are soon and we will all realize we wasted another two years of having a majority
Posted on 1/21/26 at 8:02 am to stout
Yeah, I can’t think of a major policy piece of legislation that’s come out of this Congress.
Popular
Back to top

3






