- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/28/26 at 2:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
That sounded like a lot of nothing, respectfully.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 3:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:The same thing that any market nonparticipants miss when lamenting the aggregated wealth of market participants.
What am I missing?
Millennials had tremendous buying opportunities for 10yrs between 2010-2020 during ZIRP. Instead, millennials stereotypically chose "cool" social experiences instead of marriage, real estate purchase, and/or investment. It was a poor choice.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 3:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
One of the biggies is not redoing what we've done (especially since 2009) when the economy goes bad and housing prices start to fall. Don't manipulate rates
You're implying that "when the economy goes bad," we should engage economic policies which led to the Great Depression?
Look, you and I will likely agree ZIRP continued far far far far too long in order for Janet Yellen to prop up Obama's failed economy. But when you tie it to housing as a boomer advantage vs millennials, that's a losing premise. Sorry.
This post was edited on 3/28/26 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 3/28/26 at 4:43 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The same thing that any market nonparticipants miss when lamenting the aggregated wealth of market participants.
Millennials
What does this conversation have to do with millennials?
quote:
. Instead, millennials stereotypically chose "cool" social experiences instead of marriage, real estate purchase, and/or investment. It was a poor choice.
Sounds like you have talking points locked and loaded to copy and paste whether they apply or not
This post was edited on 3/28/26 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 3/28/26 at 4:43 pm to the808bass
quote:
That sounded like a lot of nothing, respectfully.
That's what capitalism often sounds like.
But we know that's not how the Trump admin governs.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 4:46 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Look, you and I will likely agree ZIRP continued far far far far too long in order for Janet Yellen to prop up Obama's failed economy. But when you tie it to housing as a boomer advantage vs millennials, that's a losing premise. Sorry.
Did boomers (and Gen X) have a better opportunity to take advantage of that market manipulation by fedgov? Yes
Is all of that government-created equity seen in greater quantities by both population cohorts? Also yes.
Will Gen Z and younger (the ones who are angry at Trump for the economy) have anything close to that opportunity? No
Will they have the same opportunity for wages and growth? Also no.
And that's ignoring the social pathologies they have to deal with. There is a generation or 2 of young men with very limited economic future promise and an even worse landscape for marriage. Ignore them at your own peril. Irrationally try to focus on "millennials" instead, because you have some talking points ready to copy and paste, at your own peril.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 6:33 pm to SirWinston
Surprised the political talk board doesn’t know who Owen Shroyer is. He was Alex Jones sidekick until he had a fallout with him due to his undying support for Trump
If you go on infowars now, jones is turning on Trump for this war now lol
If you go on infowars now, jones is turning on Trump for this war now lol
This post was edited on 3/28/26 at 6:34 pm
Popular
Back to top


1






