- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Over 200,000 British Girls Raped, 85-95% of Perpetrators w/ Muslim Names
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:32 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Link?
It was included in the OP, dipshit.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The report discredits itself, citing a quote without substance or substantiation itself.
Told ya.. he's a piece.of shite.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:34 am to AlterEd
quote:
It was included in the OP, dipshit.
No. As i pointed out on page 1, the report cites a quote, and that quote itself has no such inquiry or data to support it.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No I fully understand emotional-irrationality. I'm just explaining why that's a bad thing on here, constantly, to people engaging in such behavior (often while ironically claiming they're acting rationally, but that's for another discussion).
You look at everything from a clinical point of view and it completely blinds you. That’s very clear here and we can all see your autism kicking into overdrive to justify it. It’s like watching Lex Friedman try to understand women.
quote:
Y'all have weird fetishes for apocalypse and civil war and it's very cringe and not supported by the majority of people.
I don’t support civil war. I can tell you that your approach is the best way to kick it off though. You’re the kind of person that thinks a good musician is someone who can simply hit the notes. There’s more to it than some sterile analysis of spreadsheets.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:35 am to i am dan
quote:
Told ya.. he's a piece.of shite
For pointing out the weaknesses of the report?
Why do you think dishonesty is the play here, instead? What productive goals will be found there?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No
No, I told this thread that you are taking issue with an independent inquiry's findings. You asked me for a link to the independent inquiry. I told you that it was included in the OP. And it was. You can take an issue with it all you want, but you are yet again establishing yourself as a conspiracy theorist.
No different than someone questioning the 9-11 report.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:39 am to AlterEd
quote:
you are taking issue with an independent inquiry's findings.
What independent inquiry? The Rape Gang Inquiry Report?
Again, there were no substantiated findings for the 200-250k number. The report cites a quote from a transcript of a HOL proceeding (which you posted ITT). That quote itself has no backing or support.
There were no findings of the 2000-250k number. There is just a reference without foundation or substantiation.
Did you even read the report? Check the cites? I clearly did. I posted about this on page 1.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
Whatever you say, conspiracy theorist.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:43 am to AlterEd
It's Citation 1 in the report. You didn't even read page 1 
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Take your conspiracy theories elsewhere.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You think that's going to win elections or just trigger emotional responses in supporters who so clearly want emotions over rationality?
Always with the “muh emotions” nonsense
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:49 am to djsdawg
quote:
Always with the “muh emotions” nonsense
He was claiming pols promoting public executions were going to sway the electorate. This wasn't some grey area of emotional wishcasting. It was quite blatant.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:54 am to AlterEd
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:56 am to Ailsa
It took all of 5 minutes for SFPs previous post to be contradicted by facts on the ground.
frickin conspiracy theorist.
frickin conspiracy theorist.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:57 am to AlterEd
quote:
It took all of 5 minutes for SFPs previous post to be contradicted by facts on the ground.
The frick? I haven't discussed the EU Parliament once ITT
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:58 am to AlterEd
quote:
It took all of 5 minutes for SFPs previous post to be contradicted by facts on the ground.
frickin conspiracy theorist.
I don't understand why anyone engages with a known troll.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:58 am to AlterEd
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:59 am to Ailsa
I have not discussed the EU Parliament once ITT
Posted on 6/17/26 at 11:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The frick? I haven't discussed the EU Parliament once ITT
You just frickin said that the public opinion polls won't sway the electorate, you dishonest shite stain. Everyone saw it. And you were, predictably, wrong.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 11:00 am to AlterEd
quote:
You just frickin said that the public opinion polls won't sway the electorate,
We were discussion British politics, not the European Parliament
Why is following what's being discussed so difficult for you?
Popular
Back to top


1







