- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Op Ed - Fiscally conservative Republicans told Trump to go pound sand
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:24 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:24 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Tax cuts are not progressive, regardless of association.
It is when you raise spending to record levels. That tax cut becomes nothing but a stimulus.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:32 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:It really isn't. I hate getting in the weeds in such a stupid discussion. Obviously MMT is crap theory, but it advocates neither for or against tax cuts as a general policy. So when you claim tax cuts are "characteristic," you may not fully understand the crap theory you're promoting.
Its the literal characteristic of MMT.
In MMT taxes are a tool to manage inflation, influence demand, and guide economic behavior, rather than a primary source of revenue for government spending. Okay?
Now can we put the dumbass premise of tax cuts being "progressive" to bed?
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:33 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Its the literal characteristic of MMT.
It really isn't.
Yes, it is.
We're stimulating the economy every single year with debt. Thats MMT.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:37 am to the808bass
quote:
Keep reading.
quote:
During the 1960s, he became the main advocate opposing Keynesian government policies
I have already read Friedman. Studied it. Here is his words:
quote:
I was a Fulbright Visiting Professor at Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge University. Because my liberal policy views were “extreme” by any Cambridge standards
Beginning in the early 1960s, I was increasingly drawn into the public arena, serving in 1964 as an economic adviser to Senator Goldwater
Goldwater was a very big tariff supporter.
There are a lot of things that sound great on paper. Sounds great when talking about them. When placed into action, results happen. Since the Free Trade Movement put in place by FDR, how much more are we in debt? Since then, how much more influence have we imported from nations that are not our friends?
Things change due to those results.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:38 am to BCreed1
quote:
Goldwater was a very big tariff supporter.
65 years ago.
There is no mfg to bring back.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:40 am to the808bass
quote:
The Debt Limit provides an inflection point for the discussion around borrowing and spending to happen. By itself, it will never decrease the debt.
So the answer is no. Are you say Chip isn't smart enough to know that we are not balancing the budget or reducing spending, increasing spending unless there is a "debt limit"?
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:40 am to BCreed1
quote:
BCreed1
What are the values that back your leftism?
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
65 years ago.
The date does not matter. The results matter. The results you claim to want came with a different set up.
You are demanding something from a "theory" that does not help the USA.
quote:
There is no mfg to bring back.
This is not about mfg! There are other things involved.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:45 am to BCreed1
quote:\
There is no mfg to bring back.
This is not about mfg! There are other things involved.
Correct. Propping up massive corporations.
Tariffs hurt Small Business.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:46 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What are the values that back your leftism?
My values are the same as they have always been. I place no value on the modern GOP who sold the USA out to grow their power and pockets.
I place value in common sense. In results.
I also understand history and how you demand it wasn't true, but... it's history.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:47 am to BCreed1
quote:
My values are the same as they have always been.
Then what are they?
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:48 am to BCreed1
quote:
I place value in common sense. In results.
Thats not a value
What are your values?
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:48 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Correct. Propping up massive corporations.
Tariffs hurt Small Business.
Yes yes... we know your talking points. Yet we have the results. Results of GOP sellouts to line their pockets and grow their power. We have the results of the FDR free trade to end wars. We have the results of 45's and it was the best economy I have lived in.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:49 am to BCreed1
another double digit thread during Trump's speech
no comments on his speech
everything you need to know
no comments on his speech
everything you need to know
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:50 am to BCreed1
quote:
Yet we have the results.
quote:
The Federal Reserve Board found that the tariffs caused a reduction in manufacturing employment of 1.4%. Modest gains (0.3%) achieved by shielding domestic producers from foreign competition were “more than offset” by rising production costs for manufacturers who used steel as an input (-1.1%) and retaliatory tariffs (-0.7%).
Did Bidens tariffs do any better?
Posted on 12/22/24 at 11:56 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
quote:
The Federal Reserve Board found that the tariffs caused a reduction in manufacturing employment of 1.4%. Modest gains (0.3%) achieved by shielding domestic producers from foreign competition were “more than offset” by rising production costs for manufacturers who used steel as an input (-1.1%) and retaliatory tariffs (-0.7%).
quote:
Did Bidens tariffs do any better?
Biden's plan was not and is not Trump's. They were not handled in the same way.. used in the same method.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 12:00 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Biden's plan was not and is not Trump's.
He expanded Trumps tariffs, why didnt they work?
Posted on 12/22/24 at 12:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Are you still pretending you understand what a tariff is?
Posted on 12/22/24 at 12:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:You simply don't understand what you're talking about.
Yes, it is.
Saying, "Yes I do too know what I'm talking about," doesn't change the fact that tax cuts are not "the literal characteristic of MMT."
They just aren't.
Sorry.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 12:07 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Yes, it is.
You simply don't understand what you're talking about.
I absolutely do. Youre trying to rationalize progressive policy.
Yes, its that simple..
Debt at full employment is a Stimulus.
This post was edited on 12/22/24 at 12:08 pm
Back to top


1





