- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: O'Keefe uncovers voter fraud....20 times in NC
Posted on 11/3/14 at 9:56 pm to germandawg
Posted on 11/3/14 at 9:56 pm to germandawg
quote:
anytime someone has to think beyond a bumper sticker length time the person requiring said thought is either stupid, a commie or trolling....GOOD SHOW!!!
Noo, that's not what he said. He said you were trolling and didn't refer at all to your ignorance or communism.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 9:57 pm to germandawg
Ok...I am out....yall have me convinced. Like every other issue near and dear to the heart of Republicans the root of the problem is that the left simply out thinks and out wits yall at every turn....
Posted on 11/3/14 at 9:58 pm to carbola
I've been away from this thread for about 10 hours and I come back to find
1. Vegas Bengal makes his only and last appearance before disappearing before tomorrow to argue semantics
2. Tuba's argument gets destroyed then he hops on vb's semantics argument.
3. Not 1 person from the left denies voter fraud can happen, does happen, and is much easier to do in no ID required states.
I bid you adieu liberals. You are about to get the shite kicked out of you tomorrow. I guess we'll see you back on the poli board a week after the results are known.
1. Vegas Bengal makes his only and last appearance before disappearing before tomorrow to argue semantics
2. Tuba's argument gets destroyed then he hops on vb's semantics argument.
3. Not 1 person from the left denies voter fraud can happen, does happen, and is much easier to do in no ID required states.
I bid you adieu liberals. You are about to get the shite kicked out of you tomorrow. I guess we'll see you back on the poli board a week after the results are known.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 10:00 pm to germandawg
quote:
Like every other issue near and dear to the heart of Republicans the root of the problem is that the left simply out thinks and out wits yall at every turn....
Except for the election tomorrow
Posted on 11/3/14 at 10:00 pm to germandawg
quote:
Ok...I am out....yall have me convinced. Like every other issue near and dear to the heart of Republicans the root of the problem is that the left simply out thinks and out wits yall at every turn....
Posted on 11/3/14 at 10:07 pm to Jbird
Unless Republicans get 53 seats MSNBC will be heralding the triumph of the DEMS. Bank on it. They are as we speak creating talking points as to why they lost, most of which will be ignorance of the voting base that voted for these Republican retards and "because, because George Bush". They'll throw a few anti-feminist Sara Palin jokes in as well. And racism. Don't forget all the racism talk.
We should start a drinking thread while watching MSNBC. I'm too tired to set the rules now but maybe tomorrow I'll start a thread on it.
We should start a drinking thread while watching MSNBC. I'm too tired to set the rules now but maybe tomorrow I'll start a thread on it.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 10:08 pm to Al Dante
quote:
We should start a drinking thread while watching MSNBC. I'm too tired to set the rules now but maybe tomorrow I'll start a thread on it.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 11:09 pm to SpidermanTUba
You insufferably silly person. You quoted me using the word "if". Why don't you tell us what "if" means since you do not interpret it to establish a conditional clause? And what is a hypothetical but a conditional circumstance or situation? The fact that I didn't use a generic third person pronoun instead of a first person pronoun does not invalidate my point. You were just plain fricking wrong when you said banks would not tolerate people demonstrating their security weaknesses.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 11:14 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
You insufferably silly person. You quoted me using the word "if". Why don't you tell us what "if" means since you do not interpret it to establish a conditional clause? And what is a hypothetical but a conditional circumstance or situation? The fact that I didn't use a generic third person pronoun instead of a first person pronoun does not invalidate my point. You were just plain fricking wrong when you said banks would not tolerate people demonstrating their security weaknesses.
Being hired by the bank to detect security flaws wasn't actually mentioned at all in your hypothetical. You said "If I walked into a bank and..." - if YOU walked into a bank and did that, you would go to prison, because YOU haven't been hired by the bank to detect security flaws - either in real life -OR- in your hypothetical.
This post was edited on 11/3/14 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 11/3/14 at 11:17 pm to BugAC
quote:
1. Vegas Bengal makes his only and last appearance before disappearing before tomorrow to argue semantics
Believe me child, I'm not invested like you loons. Not one significant piece of legislation has been passed since the Reps took the House and not one piece of significant legislation will be passed in the next two years with the Dems have filibuster and Obama's veto.
It actually will be a lot more fun watching the Civil War in the GOP because bookmark this, it will come in 2015. Reps are traditionally a great minority party and sucks at majority. Just look at this board as an example of the break with "traditional" Reps.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 11:19 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
Not one significant piece of legislation has been passed since the Reps took the House and not one piece of significant legislation will be passed in the next two years with the Dems have filibuster and Obama's veto.
Its kinda win-win.
If the Dems keep the Senate - win.
If the Republicans take it, the Congress will be even more deadlocked and more useless - and its approval rating will go even lower - and the voters will have only the R's to blame in 2016.
Posted on 11/4/14 at 6:18 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:You cocksuckers love some filibuster now?
Dems have filibuster
Posted on 11/4/14 at 6:19 am to SpidermanTUba
If the Republicans take it, the Congress will be even more deadlocked and more uselessImpossible, Harry Reid will be gone from leadership.
Posted on 11/4/14 at 6:57 am to Jbird
quote:
Watch MSNBC in oh about 20 hours.
CNN my friend. You made my point better than I could...despite the over whelming odds the GOP faces...massive amounts of voter fraud, a media lapdog that never paints the GOP as anything other than the devil incarnate, no where near the money that the left has to operate with because labor unions have waaaaaayyyyyy more cash than corporations have and of course the welfare queen vote making certain she can have another dozen kids or so to get more money each month it is astonishing that the GOP still exists let alone is on the verge of taking over Washington and doing gods will.......it is almost as heroic a tale as Georgia Southern beating Florida last year.....
Posted on 11/4/14 at 7:00 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
If the Republicans take it, the Congress will be even more deadlocked and more useless
No, because Harry Reid will no longer be able to refuse to bring House bills to a vote.
We'll see a lot of vetoes by Obama but there's a very good chance that more legislation will pass.
Posted on 11/4/14 at 7:01 am to germandawg
quote:Good morning Gdawg.
CNN my friend.
Posted on 11/4/14 at 7:06 am to Jbird
Good morning and enjoy the news today.....it is gonna be a banner day for democracy in the US!
This post was edited on 11/4/14 at 7:08 am
Posted on 11/4/14 at 7:13 am to germandawg
quote:Well it should be a night of interesting story lines.
Good morning and enjoy the news today.....it is gonna be a banner day for democracy in the US!
Posted on 11/4/14 at 7:18 am to Truckasaurus
quote:
It sounds like James O'Keefe is the one committing voter fraud.
LOfrickingL
The spin you people will put on anything is outstanding. Like it or not, voter fraud happens all the time and it happens on both sides of the aisle. I cannot understand the mindset of why ANYONE would be against having a person prove who they are in order to vote.
Are you also against people proving who they are in order to fly? obtain a loan? get a driver's license? etc...?
Popular
Back to top


0


