- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:27 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:27 pm to BayouBengal51
Still no word on the the missing WSO?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:28 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
X isn’t reliable as a source like it was several years ago.
I'm sorry that the Ayatollah has been killed and can no longer spew "Death To America" any longer
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:41 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
Still no word on the the missing WSO?
Still no word. We allegedly have special forces now on the ground communicating with him and are trying to reach him. We know he can communicate via his encrypted radio.
Best guess is they are probably communicating with him to get him into a favorable area for rescue that mitigates enemy contact. It is night time in Iran so that helps with SAR due to our guys training and equipment.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:07 pm to BayouBengal51
Is it safe to say the USAF has all roads to this area very, very covered and if the Iranians send significant numbers of people there, they will be hit bigly?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:09 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:11 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:15 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:18 pm to BayouBengal51
quote:
BayouBengal51
Thanks man, praying we rescue him soon.
This post was edited on 4/3/26 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:29 pm to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
The Pentagon’s request for new shipbuilding funds is among the highest-ever since the Korean War, rivaling the Reagan-era 600-ship spending plan and the nuclear submarine buildup in the 1960s, according to budget documents.
In a $1.5 trillion Fiscal Year 2027 national security submission split between the base budget and reconciliation, the Navy wants a total of $65.8 billion for shipbuilding, as President Donald Trump pursues several new ship classes under the Golden Fleet concept.
The Navy is seeking $60.2 billion for shipbuilding in the base budget and $5.6 billion in reconciliation, according to Pentagon budget documents. When adjusted for inflation, the new request is the second-largest shipbuilding budget proposal since 1955, according to Congressional Budget Office data. The highest request in real dollars was in 1962, during the U.S. Navy’s “41 for Freedom ” ballistic missile nuclear submarine drive.
A two-page White House fact sheet detailing the so-called skinny budget proposal says the FY 2027 request is seeking 41 ships across the government, but does not provide a breakdown of classes or which services are buying the vessels. A separate section of the fact sheet says the administration is asking for “18 battle force ships and 16 non-battle force ships,” for a total of 34 naval ships.
The Navy wants two Virginia-class attack submarines, one Columbia-class ballistic missile boat, one FF(X) frigate, one Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, one San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock, one America-class amphibious assault ship, six Megan McClung-class medium landing ships, two AS(X) submarine tenders, two John Lewis-class fleet oilers, one “special mission ship,” one T-AGOS ocean surveillance ship, one strategic sealift, one bulk fuel vessel, one T-AH(X), one used sealift ship, four ship-to-shore connectors, five fire boats and two Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) Service Life-Extension Programs (SLEP).
This post was edited on 4/3/26 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:34 pm to GeauxZone90
You think a Chaplain and a General from a training command are in charge of sending in the ground forces?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:35 pm to BayouBengal51
quote:
Still no word. We allegedly have special forces now on the ground communicating with him and are trying to reach him. We know he can communicate via his encrypted radio.
Best guess is they are probably communicating with him to get him into a favorable area for rescue that mitigates enemy contact. It is night time in Iran so that helps with SAR due to our guys training and equipment.
How did he and the other pilot get separated? Is ejection like that too hectic to parachute into the same location?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:40 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:40 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:42 pm to The Baker
They probably did not eject exactly at the same time. The pilot may have stayed in just a tad longer. And a tad may result in being several miles apart.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:44 pm to The Baker
Believe I read they separated on purpose
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:45 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:46 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:48 pm to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
“U.S. military officials have said it is operating with air superiority over large parts of Iran and that the U.S. military has hit over 12,300 targets.
The aircraft losses do “not invalidate the larger reality that U.S. and allied forces have achieved a very high degree of air superiority over Iran,” Deptula said. “Air superiority does not mean zero risk.””
quote:
From our article today regarding statements from U.S. military officials that America has air superiority over large parts of Iran:
“High-end combat against a capable, integrated air defense system is never risk-free,” retired Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, dean of AFA’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies. “What distinguishes modern Western airpower is not invulnerability, but the ability to survive, penetrate, and sustain operations while keeping losses exceptionally low.”
U.S. military officials have said it is operating with air superiority over large parts of Iran and that the U.S. military has hit over 12,300 targets.
The aircraft losses do “not invalidate the larger reality that U.S. and allied forces have achieved a very high degree of air superiority over Iran,” Deptula said. “Air superiority does not mean zero risk.”
LINK
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:50 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:57 pm to hawgfaninc
I wonder if the full airborne contingent is on the way.
Popular
Back to top



1





