Started By
Message

re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread

Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:27 pm to
Posted by Sl0thstronautEsq
Member since Aug 2018
18065 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:27 pm to
Still no word on the the missing WSO?
Posted by Rainier Fog
Member since Jul 2025
1202 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

X isn’t reliable as a source like it was several years ago.


I'm sorry that the Ayatollah has been killed and can no longer spew "Death To America" any longer
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
9357 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

Still no word on the the missing WSO?


Still no word. We allegedly have special forces now on the ground communicating with him and are trying to reach him. We know he can communicate via his encrypted radio.

Best guess is they are probably communicating with him to get him into a favorable area for rescue that mitigates enemy contact. It is night time in Iran so that helps with SAR due to our guys training and equipment.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24816 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:07 pm to
Is it safe to say the USAF has all roads to this area very, very covered and if the Iranians send significant numbers of people there, they will be hit bigly?
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
9357 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:09 pm to
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
9357 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:11 pm to
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:15 pm to
Posted by Sl0thstronautEsq
Member since Aug 2018
18065 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

BayouBengal51


Thanks man, praying we rescue him soon.
This post was edited on 4/3/26 at 7:20 pm
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:29 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

The Pentagon’s request for new shipbuilding funds is among the highest-ever since the Korean War, rivaling the Reagan-era 600-ship spending plan and the nuclear submarine buildup in the 1960s, according to budget documents.

In a $1.5 trillion Fiscal Year 2027 national security submission split between the base budget and reconciliation, the Navy wants a total of $65.8 billion for shipbuilding, as President Donald Trump pursues several new ship classes under the Golden Fleet concept.

The Navy is seeking $60.2 billion for shipbuilding in the base budget and $5.6 billion in reconciliation, according to Pentagon budget documents. When adjusted for inflation, the new request is the second-largest shipbuilding budget proposal since 1955, according to Congressional Budget Office data. The highest request in real dollars was in 1962, during the U.S. Navy’s “41 for Freedom ” ballistic missile nuclear submarine drive.

A two-page White House fact sheet detailing the so-called skinny budget proposal says the FY 2027 request is seeking 41 ships across the government, but does not provide a breakdown of classes or which services are buying the vessels. A separate section of the fact sheet says the administration is asking for “18 battle force ships and 16 non-battle force ships,” for a total of 34 naval ships.

The Navy wants two Virginia-class attack submarines, one Columbia-class ballistic missile boat, one FF(X) frigate, one Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, one San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock, one America-class amphibious assault ship, six Megan McClung-class medium landing ships, two AS(X) submarine tenders, two John Lewis-class fleet oilers, one “special mission ship,” one T-AGOS ocean surveillance ship, one strategic sealift, one bulk fuel vessel, one T-AH(X), one used sealift ship, four ship-to-shore connectors, five fire boats and two Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) Service Life-Extension Programs (SLEP).
This post was edited on 4/3/26 at 7:30 pm
Posted by Brisketeer
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
1683 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:34 pm to
You think a Chaplain and a General from a training command are in charge of sending in the ground forces?
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20201 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Still no word. We allegedly have special forces now on the ground communicating with him and are trying to reach him. We know he can communicate via his encrypted radio.

Best guess is they are probably communicating with him to get him into a favorable area for rescue that mitigates enemy contact. It is night time in Iran so that helps with SAR due to our guys training and equipment.


How did he and the other pilot get separated? Is ejection like that too hectic to parachute into the same location?
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:40 pm to
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:40 pm to
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24816 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:42 pm to
They probably did not eject exactly at the same time. The pilot may have stayed in just a tad longer. And a tad may result in being several miles apart.
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
15690 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:44 pm to
Believe I read they separated on purpose
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:45 pm to
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:46 pm to
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:48 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

“U.S. military officials have said it is operating with air superiority over large parts of Iran and that the U.S. military has hit over 12,300 targets.

The aircraft losses do “not invalidate the larger reality that U.S. and allied forces have achieved a very high degree of air superiority over Iran,” Deptula said. “Air superiority does not mean zero risk.””

quote:

From our article today regarding statements from U.S. military officials that America has air superiority over large parts of Iran:

“High-end combat against a capable, integrated air defense system is never risk-free,” retired Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, dean of AFA’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies. “What distinguishes modern Western airpower is not invulnerability, but the ability to survive, penetrate, and sustain operations while keeping losses exceptionally low.”

U.S. military officials have said it is operating with air superiority over large parts of Iran and that the U.S. military has hit over 12,300 targets.

The aircraft losses do “not invalidate the larger reality that U.S. and allied forces have achieved a very high degree of air superiority over Iran,” Deptula said. “Air superiority does not mean zero risk.”

LINK
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:50 pm to
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
10728 posts
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:57 pm to
I wonder if the full airborne contingent is on the way.
first pageprev pagePage 559 of 845Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram