Started By
Message

re: Obama Judge Permanently Blocks Trump's Proof of Citizenship

Posted on 6/25/26 at 5:52 am to
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7923 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 5:52 am to
As a matter of substantive policy, the text of the EO makes sense, but we already have case law to the contrary on the meaning of “Election Day.” I think you understate the value a statute would have and overstate the hostility of the courts to this administration. Are you aware that left- enter sources like The Atlantic and NPR frequently complain that the current Supreme Court is a mere rubber stamp for the Trump presidency? Of course, they’re wrong, but the point is that Trump has plenty of wins in the courts.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63680 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 7:30 am to
Didn't t he USSC just say that district judges cannot issue nationwide rulings? I think they did.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
78676 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 7:32 am to
They did, but this broad is on the "Go Down with the DS Ship" plan.
Posted by LawTalkingGuy
Member since Mar 2025
258 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Didn't t he USSC just say that district judges cannot issue nationwide rulings? I think they did.


She didn't issue a national injunction. Her ruling only applies to the 19 states that were plaintiffs in the action.

And for those people laughing at her use of the word "Permanently", that just means the injunction is part of a final order. An injunction entered during the course of a trial is a "preliminary injunction", and an injunction entered as part of a final judgment is a "permanent injunction".
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram