re: NY Times: Pentagon’s UFO Program - aerospace/esoteric/quantum mechanics/future

quote:

---

AUGUST 9, 2018 BY LINDA MOULTON HOWE
Part 7: Mysterious Metal from Bottom of Wedge-Shaped UFO — Update 1996-2018 Research

---

quote:

---

This Part 7 is new to my Earthfiles reports about my investigations of the Bismuth/MagnesiumZinc layered metals. The following interview transcript is from my recorded interview on February 2, 2017, with a whistleblower physicist, who requests anonymity. He contacted me to say he had been following my efforts to investigate the Bi/MgZn since 1996, and wanted me to know that he had worked with a large “skin” of the same layered metal underground at Area 51, Nevada, in the 1970s.

But the physicist said he worked on a slab of the layered metal that was 6 feet long and 3 feet wide! That, he said, was the outer skin that covered the entire wedge-shaped craft, not just the underside. The key he stressed was the inner skin of pure aluminum that has “mono-iridium atoms intelligently placed at the atomic and sub-atomic level of the inner skin.” It’s the combination of the two parallel skins that disconnects the craft from Earth’s gravity, inertia and atmosphere.

---

quote:

---

“The magnesium-zinc alloy is an electrogravitic rectifier. You energize it in order to cause it to rectify gravitational field energy — unidirectional force, one direction, based upon how you have the material oriented. And when the Bi/MgZn material is being energized, along with the other structure of the craft — the structure of the craft really negates gravitational energy from penetrating. In other words, it becomes weightless. So, from that is no inertia, it’s essentially weightless. It takes very little energy to push it around. So when it’s in that state, that’s when you can push it around with electrogravitic material. So you strengthen it in the direction that you want to activate the electrogravitic material. Otherwise, it balances out all the way around and you are neutrally buoyant. You are just floating there. But when you strengthen the field in any given direction, you change the amount of electrogravitic force in that particular direction

---

quote:

---

Now, the material has to be literally bombarded with non-Hertzian energy from terahertz frequencies. It cannot be electromagnetic. It has to be pulses, very fast pulses, very fast transition times. Modern electronics cannot achieve this. Generators have to be designed specifically for this application. If someone tries to use an off-the-shelf component to build a terahertz generator, I don’t think he is going to be able to do it. But I built one.

Linda: DID YOU BUILD YOURS TO GENERATE THE NON-HERTZIAN FREQUENCIES?

Yes. And I used technology that was discovered by Nicolai Tesla. He called it non-Hertzian energy.

---

quote:

---

SO HOW DID TESLA DO THAT?

Tesla did it electromechanically. He literally used contacts. Commutators. Spark gaps. That’s the entire key to being able to do wireless transmission of power. It’s not done with electromagnetics. It’s not done through magnetic induction. Even his coils and transformers were not formed to use the magnetic field. He matched mass, primary and secondary mass, in order to get coupling. If the layered metal is subjected to magnetic fields, it will make the monatomic iridium leave and then the layered metal won’t work. Magnetic fields will ruin the layered metal material. So all the experimentation to this date from 1996 that you have reported about would make the monatomic iridium leave, so none of the tests tried so far would work. Also, in the Army guy’s first letter dated April 10, 1996 (Part 1), it says: ‘The Dimensional Powerplant was self-destructed, and the inter-atmospheric propulsion system also deactivated to prevent the technology from falling into the hands of the Terrans (humans).’

---

quote:

---

SO IS IT THE BISMUTH/MAGNESIUM-ZINC LAYERED SKIN THAT IS EMITTING THE TERAHERTZ FREQUENCY THAT CAN DAMAGE HUMAN TISSUES AND MANIPULATE HUMAN MINDS?

It’s actually the drive energy that is going through the material, penetrating and radiating out from the craft.

CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT IN MORE DETAIL?
No, I can’t.

BECAUSE?
We’re delving into highly classified areas here.

---

quote:

---

CAN YOU DESCRIBE WHAT YOU SAW AND IF THERE WERE ANY SYMBOLS OR HIEROGLYPHS?

Yes, there were, but they are not visible until you remove the inspection covers. I can’t get into that, because that particular aspect of what I worked on was never declassified.

I HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT WERE GIVEN TO ME BY SANTILLI IN LONDON WITH PERMISSION THAT SHOW SYMBOLS ON BEAMS AND WHEN I DID A SEARCH OF MY OWN GOING TO ALL THE ANCIENT LANGUAGES OF EARTH, THEY MATCHED ANCIENT GREEK.

I wouldn’t doubt that.

---

quote:

---

alleged 1947 U. S. Army film of UFO crash debris near Socorro, NM, contained this I-beam with symbols that resemble ancient Greek letters

---

quote:

---

DO YOU HAVE ANY INSIGHTS ABOUT THE MATCH OF ANCIENT GREEK TO THE SYMBOLS INSIDE OF THESE CRAFT IN WHICH THE SKIN IS THE BISMUTH MAGNESIUM-ZINC LAYERED METAL?

I can’t do that. I can’t give that information out publicly.

BUT YOU DO HAVE KNOWLEDGE? Yes. AND IT IS FAIR TO SAY THAT THE GREEKS WERE PROBABLY ANOTHER INTELLIGENCE BASED ON THIS PLANET AND NOT EVOLUTIONARY HOMO SAPIENS?

I can’t say that (laughs), I’m sorry, I can’t delve into that.

WELL, I’VE BEEN TOLD IN THE LAST TWO YEARS THAT IS IN FACT THE TRUTH.

I can say this much – there have been more advanced civilizations on this planet prior to us that were far more advanced than we are today.”

---

quote:

---

Thine, any links/articles related to the presence of unknowns in the ocean/arctic? I'm fascinated with reading about the potential existence of terrestrial presence.

---

quote:

---

What U.S. Submariners Actually Say About Detection Of So-Called Unidentified Submerged Objects Big claims abound about mysterious objects submariners detect below the waves, so we went straight to the source and what we found out was surprising.
BY TYLER ROGOWAYJANUARY 3, 2019

---

quote:

---

The Truth Behind The Malibu Underwater ‘Alien Base’ By Lee Speigel 06/19/2014 09:27 AM ET | Updated Dec 06, 2017

---

quote:

---

A little more than 6 miles off the coast of Point Dume in Malibu, California, an unusual-looking structure sits on the sea bed floor. Based on images obtained on Google Earth, the oval-shaped object has a huge flat top and what appear to be pillars or columns that seem to reveal the entrance to a darker, inner place. The anomaly — for the moment, we’ll call it that — is approximately 2,000 feet below the surface of the water, measuring nearly 3 miles wide. What exactly is this thing?

---

quote:

---

The Huffington Post one of his listeners — someone named Maxwell — contacted him last month with a Google Earth image showing something odd, underwater off the coast of Malibu. Church then asked graphic designer Dale Romero to capture as many angled images of the anomaly as he could. “I needed him to find a way to get it under and above the water,” Church said. “My first impression was that it was Greek, it looked artificial and didn’t look natural. “When you’re looking at it from above, it’s a nearly perfect oval shape,” Church continued. “In the natural surroundings, nothing is symmetrical. Everything is eroded and covered in rocks and sloping and peaking, and right here, for 2 miles, it is a perfect oval with a black separation or outline to it. “It just stands out that it has to be some type of roof. It’s not unlike a domed stadium or a covered indoor race track or an Olympic arena — it’s got that feel to it. It looks like a perfect oval manmade structure sitting on a construction site.”

---

quote:

---

arctic

---

quote:

---

Linda Moulton Howe Live – 05/15/2019

---

quote:

---

UFO Presence - Politico - Washington Examiner Statement 169 views

---

quote:

---

Why the UFO story is far more interesting than you think
by Tom Rogan

---

quote:

---

Most informed individuals I have talked to believe that the Tic Tac-like UFOs are unmanned vehicles operating under direction from either a manned or larger unmanned vessel. A particularly interesting evidentiary point here is the witness testimony by Cmdr. David Fravor during his time as commanding officer for a naval fighter squadron assigned to the Nimitz carrier strike group. In the November 2004 Nimitz incident, Fravor describes seeing both the Tic Tacs and "something in the water... looks like waves are going to crash over the top and you're going to get this white-water."

---

quote:

---

Some discredit these witness reports. The New York Times report, for example, interviews astrophysicist Leon Golub. Golub suggests that the aircrew testimony is a result of "bugs in the code for the imaging and display systems, atmospheric effects and reflections, neurological overload from multiple inputs during high-speed flight." I strongly disagree, because the credible witness statements are numerous, matched to data recordings, and associated with a far larger set of similar incidents currently not public. But while natural phenomena such as that under the theoretical phenomena of ball lightning is a strong possibility in some UFO cases, I strongly believe other UFOs reported by naval aviators and other military professionals are not natural phenomena. First, UFOs have repeatedly shown what seems to be intelligence in their operation and behavior-response to manned aircraft and monitoring systems in their vicinity. I am led to believe that the Russians (including in the Soviet era) have repeatedly tried and failed to shoot down UFOs, which have practiced evasive techniques.

---

quote:

---

In addition, UFOs have shown an ability to travel at hypersonic speeds with anti-gravity characteristics. Some underwater phenomena are also capable of supercavitation speeds of hundreds of miles per hour underwater. Note that when it comes to underwater objects, the recorded size indicates they are not torpedoes or vessels of any known type.

Fourth, UFOs often show evidence of plasma manipulation, possibly in relation to manifested cloaking capabilities.

I am also extraordinarily confident these UFOs are not the creation of any current government or private interest. They are definitely not U.S. in origin, and they are far in advance of Chinese and Russian capabilities — including in the field of hypersonic capabilities (which the Russians lead in).

So where does this leave us?

---

quote:

---

You should, for example, listen to credible individuals such as Luis Elizondo — former head of the Pentagon's former UFO research agency, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Elizondo does not talk about aliens. But you should not listen to Elizondo's To The Stars Academy colleague, Tom DeLonge (the musician is overexcited and says things that are unbound from analytical credibility). Still, this is an interesting issue in many areas. Take the research by NASA into space-time manipulation, for example. Or the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program-contracted study into faster than light travel. Take a guess why the study was authorized.

---

quote:

---

That first link seems like it should be headline news, across the world.

---

quote:

---

PLEASE, GOD, LET IT BE ALIENS AND NOT TRUMP’S SPACE FORCE
It appears the U.S. government is softening us up for a revelation, either regarding extraterrestrial life or a world-disruptive military technology. It’s sad to say that alien life seems like the safer option.
BY T.A. FRANK MAY 30, 2019 6:04 PM

---

quote:

---

What’s going on? Speculation is rife on the Y Combinator forums. Guesses include U.S. drones (a terrestrial craft), “Von Neumann probes” (self-perpetuating extraterrestrial craft), and a “disinformation campaign” (none of the above). Politico reports that advocates of the Navy’s new UFO reporting rules simply want to change “a culture in which personnel feel that speaking up about it could hurt their career.” After all, in an age when “removing the stigma” has become a refrain on everything from cannabis to male postpartum depression, maybe it was inevitable that overcoming UFO shame was next. We don’t want to invalidate your flying saucer feelings.

---

quote:

---

If the objects are real, as opposed to optical illusions or radar glitches, they move in a mystifying manner and suggest a technological breakthrough of history-altering importance. Odds are low that they’re products of the U.S. military, because some of these vessels have come close to colliding with manned U.S. aircraft, and such recklessness would be unlikely among aerospace experts in a secret program. On the other hand, such recklessness would also be odd for any other country capable of producing such vessels. Looks like that leaves only Zorgon.

---

quote:

---

Some people speculate that the U.S. government, by making these sightings public, is softening us up for a revelation, either regarding extraterrestrial life or a world-disruptive technology. It’s sad to say that alien life seems like the safer option. If the UFOs turned out to be man-made, then the first worry would be that the inventors weren’t American. The second worry would be that they were. If China or Russia had developed a force-field propulsion technology, whatever that is, they could use their new power for ill, as they have in the past. On the other hand, if the United States had developed a force-field propulsion technology—well, our stretch as a lone superpower following the collapse of the Soviet Union was not characterized by excessive prudence. Compared to earthly hegemons, alien Tic Tacs seem benign, apart from their erratic driving. These UFOs could change human history, but, for now, we aren’t giving them much thought. They’re just floating about, unexplained and unidentified, and we have work to do. But mention them in conversation and they’re likely to lead to nervous humor, as do most things unfamiliar and out of our control. The pilots may be laughing, because they have the comfort of peers who are seeing the same thing, but most wouldn’t be laughing if they were alone. We know that life is fragile and that it continues at the mercy of a universe on a little planet orbiting around a star that will eventually flame out. The odds of these supersonic ovals in our midst turning out to be a net plus for humanity are low. Worrying about Donald Trump is almost reassuringly small by comparison. But at least we’re trusting our military personnel to see what’s in front of them. As Colonel Edwards asks, “How could I hope to hold down my command if I didn’t believe in what I saw and shot at?”

---

quote:

---

Tom DeLonge on ‘Scary’ UFO Footage, Angels and Airwaves and Blink-182’s Future Since leaving Blink-182 to study UFOs, the guitarist has been on one of the strangest odysseys in rock. But as he puts it: “Maybe Tom isn’t so nuts after all”
By PATRICK DOYLE

---

quote:

---

What did it feel like to see the latest article in the Times?

This is the third New York Times article that we organized and put together at To the Stars. But this one’s dealing directly with the pilots that are current military pilots that we took to the Senate and Congress. A few weeks ago, there was another article that leaked on the Times that Congress is putting together a formal reporting mechanism to the Navy on UFOs. That’s us again. Our show Unidentified is us doing that. Taking these specific pilots to Congress, influencing legislative language for oversight committees and for the appropriations committees. In that process, it leaked and came out in the papers. But our show is what this article specifically is about. And [it’s] very real. Lieutenant Graves [said] they had a fleet of UFO’s follow their carrier battle group for eight months out to the Middle East where they’re intercepting them almost on a daily basis. It’s pretty unnerving.

---

quote:

---

So that UFO footage that the Times posted — explain what that is.

It’s gun-camera footage. And what people don’t understand is they could be many, many miles away. But they’re zoomed in on an object. And even when the object just bounces an inch on the screen, that means it could’ve gone from zero to 20,000 miles an hour in a snap of your fingers. It’s a big deal even though it just looks like a little blob. But if you’re a pilot, or if you’re a radar operator, or a trained military observer, you know exactly what that is and it’s scary to them. Because things don’t do that. There’s no wings; there’s no plume on the infrared cameras. You will see an outline of a plane. You will see the fire coming out of the back — these crafts don’t have that. They’re circular or disc-like in shape. They have blurred edges. They have observability. They have positive lift and all these different factors that the government has identified. Any one of these things — they call them these five observables, and any one of them, if a country were to get one of these five, it would be a paradigm shift. A game-changing national-security issue. And these craft have five of them. What we’re showing Congress, and what we’ve been doing in the Senate, that we’re now bringing out to the American people and the world, it’s like, “This is fricking real. And it’s real scary, so let’s get our stuff together and deal with it.”

---

quote:

---

Why is the footage “scary” and dangerous to you?

Because you’re dealing with something [that] you don’t know what it is, you don’t know who’s in there or who’s operating these things. [Luis Elizondo] says it best: It’s kind of like you go to bed at night, you lock your doors, you set your alarm. And then you wake up in the morning, unlock the door and there’s bloody footprints through your whole living room. And you’re like, “The alarm didn’t trip, the doors were still locked, but someone walked right through my house and I had no clue. Whose footprints are those?” That’s kind of scary, because you have no clue how they could bypass all the security systems of your house effortlessly. Something with this technology is in charge. This is like rolling into some type of indigenous tribe that’s never met man. They’re deep in the forests of some remote Pacific Island and we come in with an aircraft carrier and a stealth fighter and all they have are sticks. Who’s in charge should they choose to impose their will? We don’t even know what this is, but we have to think in terms of that. And that’s a big deal.

And think about the technology of these, too. Think about World War II when we were the only ones that had the nuclear bomb. You could take over the world. This is so far beyond nuclear power. They talk about civilizations, the Type 1, Type 2, Type 3 civilizations. A Type 1 civilization can control the power of the planet, and Type 2 can control the power of the sun and a Type 3 civilization can control the power of their own galaxy. We’re not even a Type 1 civilization yet. This could be a Type 2 or Type 3 that’s operating these things. I have no clue, but the technology that it is, is so far beyond what we can do that it’s unnerving. You have to hope that they’re loving. That’s a stretch probably, right?

---

quote:

---

Do you see Trump talking about this?

That’s a good question. I don’t know. I do know that because of our efforts, the White House has been definitely informed of some things. I wouldn’t know what. I do think that there’s the potential that some of his Space Force comments are taking into account some of the data and information regarding the subject. Do you think the Space Force is a good idea? I don’t know. It make sense to me because when we wanted to deal with oceans, we created the Navy. We created the Army to deal with land. We created the Air Force to deal with the sky. Space is a real thing now; we can get there. And there’s things out there. One of the radar operators, the guy I was referring to that was a Top Gun graduate, he’s the one that sent out the intercept. Commander Fravor [a retired Navy commander who reported the 2004 U.S.S. Princeton incident] was sent by this guy and he watched 100 craft come in from space over a four-day period. One hundred!

Where?

Over the coast of San Diego. So they came in, they hovered and they would drop in .78 seconds from 80,000 feet to sea level. Do you realize how fast .78 seconds is? 80,000 feet to zero. It’s just there. That’s just unreal! The question would be, “Is it imperative that we create an entire division that deals with space?” It makes sense to me because it’s not like we can tell the Navy to worry about space. Maybe they want to. Maybe they consider space like the ocean or something. I don’t even know. It’s just way above anything that I’ve experienced.

---