- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NO COLLUSION and NO OBSTRUCTION!
Posted on 5/21/19 at 6:58 pm to Seldom Seen
Posted on 5/21/19 at 6:58 pm to Seldom Seen
If a Trump hired political research firm and a British spy and paid them to collude with Putin's top adviser to cook up dirt on Hillary, it would be criminal.
Oh, oops! That was Hillary hiring Fusion GPS and Steele to conspire with the Kremlin to cook up dirt on Trump.
Oh, oops! That was Hillary hiring Fusion GPS and Steele to conspire with the Kremlin to cook up dirt on Trump.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 7:49 pm
0
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:02 pm to Seldom Seen
Still trying to figure out where the report confirms that
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:11 pm to TheHumanTornado
Well...it specifically says no collusion, which is surprising because it’si not a prosecutors job to exonerate. A prosecutor simply not prosecuting is enough to presume innocence.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:13 pm to Seldom Seen
The dead horse has been beaten again.
If he says it enough will that make it true?
If he says it enough will that make it true?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:22 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
and they arrived....at a conclusion of NO COLLUSION and NO OBSTRUCTION!
fml I feel like ibfreeman.
Mueller:
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:24 pm to bmy
Impeach then brah
What is your party waiting for?
What is your party waiting for?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:25 pm to bmy
Let’s agree the report said no collusion. On obstruction the report left it to the AG. Barr and Rosenstein said No Obstruction. Can we agree to that?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:26 pm to Tiguar
quote:
No special prosecutor was ever appointed for Benghazi.
Is there a statute of limitations on having an investigation?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:31 pm to ApexTiger
I don't think the final expense report for the honest Bob report is in yet? So I don't think Trump is flubbing the numbers. Weinstein is probably still getting paid via some Nadler fund. 
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:44 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Let’s agree the report said no collusion. On obstruction the report left it to the AG. Barr and Rosenstein said No Obstruction. Can we agree to that?
Of course -- oversight is warranted/should be welcomed here given
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:50 pm to bmy
quote:
Of course -- oversight is warranted/should be welcomed here given
Obstruction is a criminal offense. Since Mueller declined to prosecute, the AG has sole jurisdiction and discretion whether to prosecute. He and Rosenstein stated there was no obstruction. What you welcome is a political investigation, which is fine. Let’s not pretend that Congress has the authority to make a criminal finding. It is purely political.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:05 pm to BBONDS25
The truth is whataboutism?
So, what would that make willful blindness like yours.
So, what would that make willful blindness like yours.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:05 pm to jivy26
Not uptight in the least. The folks I'm referring to are dyed-in-the-wool libtards who don't know what they're outraged about until some blue check informs them thusly.
Are you one of those people?
Are you one of those people?
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:11 pm to TGFN57
quote:
The truth is whataboutism?
Whataboutism is a term invented by the left to deflect from their hypocrisy. You use it to justify baseless investigations. The difference you fail to see is that there was actually a there, there in Benghazi. There is no there in muh Russia/obstruction.
quote:
what would that make willful blindness like yours.
Now this is the type of hypocrisy that could use a whataboutism.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:23 pm to VoxDawg
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/7/22 at 6:41 am
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:27 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Obstruction is a criminal offense. Since Mueller declined to prosecute, the AG has sole jurisdiction and discretion whether to prosecute. He and Rosenstein stated there was no obstruction. What you welcome is a political investigation, which is fine. Let’s not pretend that Congress has the authority to make a criminal finding. It is purely political.
and a sitting president cannot be indicted.. which is why it's imperative that they have and use the authority to exercise oversight of the executive and the ability to impeach if necessary. we both know that even if he was impeached he wouldn't be removed -- it's too partisan (and republicans voting yes/dems voting no would be forfeiting the next election). "[the absence of evidence of conspiracy with russia] bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction"
Mueller says there is substantial evidence of the intent. AG says there is not. Dems would really like to see the full report and relevant information. It's really not that crazy and it should be painfully obvious that it's political.. because every single one of them is a politician
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:28 pm to jivy26
/sigh
You *are* one of those people. That's unfortunate.
Hold onto those Russian Collusion fantasies, man. Maybe one day it'll happen.
You *are* one of those people. That's unfortunate.
Hold onto those Russian Collusion fantasies, man. Maybe one day it'll happen.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:33 pm to Seldom Seen
Facts don't matter to the dems.
The Mueller report did not change any of their minds.
They are programmed to mindlessly destroy.
(see my sig quote)
The Mueller report did not change any of their minds.
They are programmed to mindlessly destroy.
(see my sig quote)
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:43 pm to zunic
quote:
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
1h1 hour ago
After spending 40 Million Dollars, reviewing 1.4 million pages of documents, & interviewing 500 people with the total support of the White House, the Mueller Report was a BIG DISAPPOINTMENT to the Democrats, so they want a DO OVER. It doesn’t work that way-so bad for our Country!
quote:
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
51m51 minutes ago
The Democrats are on a fishing expedition, wanting to interview the same people, and see the same things, as we just went through for two years with Robert Mueller and the 18 Angry Dems. Never happened to a president before. Never even happened to President Obama!
quote:
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
56m56 minutes ago
John Brennan on the Mueller probe, “I don’t know if I received bad information, but I THINK I SUSPECTED THAT THERE WAS MORE THAN THERE ACTUALLY WAS.” Wow, he admits he was wrong! Congress should go back to work on drug prices etc.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:44 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
The Democrats are on a fishing expedition, wanting to interview the same people, and see the same things, as we just went through for two years with Robert Mueller and the 18 Angry Dems. Never happened to a president before. Never even happened to President Obama!
i think he forgot about bill
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News